**THIS BLOG IS THE ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS. Others have snatched up our Tea Party Fire Ants domains except for "dot US" which we grabbed when we saw what they were doing. All others are unauthorized to imply themselves as having any ownership or organizational input to this group. THIS IS THE ONLY SITE OF THE
TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS.
See 1:34 of this video:**
CONGRESSIONAL CONTACT LIST HAS BEEN RESTORED TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE!TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS.
See 1:34 of this video:**
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Saturday, May 11, 2013
IT'S BEEN 8 MONTHS SINCE THE MURDERS IN BENGHAZI. 8 months since a liberal democrat Ambassador who admired Obama was trapped in an impending death trap and left to be killed by that same man he admired. 8 months since communications officer Sean Smith ruminated on social media on his own possible death that night, which happened. 8 months since 2 ex-SEALS broke ranks by disobeying orders - to do nothing - and died saving 33 survivors who have not been identified or heard from since being taken under Obama's "wing".
It's been 8 months since the cover-up and obvious administration conspiracy began; a conspiracy now fast unraveling so badly that even the fawning media that forced a blind eye and deaf ear onto the public and so doing duped them into electing Obama, has now decided to turn against Obama - for the first time started reporting of Obama the way he should have been reported on since the beginning: a shady figure and abject life failure clearly responsible for the deaths of those people in Benghazi. No American President with the authority and resources of the most powerful nation on earth could have failed to have saved those people unless, for whatever his reason, he either wanted them dead or simply didn't have enough human decency to keep from committing an act of positively heinous negligent homicide.
What do we now know that we didn't know then? For clarity, I'll skip the prose and just make a bullet-point list, because these facts now need to be easily referenced as we watch the failing of an American President on a scale never witnessed in this nation before:
1. We know that the killings had absolutely nothing to do with a video that viewed Islam unfavorably as Obama told the United Nations when he lied to the General Assembly.
2. We know that the excuse that the killings were due to a video came directly from Libyan propaganda (a story broken by this blog).
3. We know that Obama and Hillary Clinton lied about the circumstances of the Benghazi deaths, while Obama had the gall to tell Mitt Romney, in a presidential debate, that he, Obama, was "offended" at the implication that he had engaged in the politicization of the Benghazi deaths, when we now know Obama did worse than that: he lied about them to keep his election-year narrative - of having defeated Islamic terrorism - from blowing up in his face and showing to the world his dismal failure as both a diplomat and a leader.
4. We know that there were 33 Benghazi survivor witnesses who have not been identified or heard from after a very alarming 8 months. This is not hysteria or hyperbole, this is serious: people with their own lives, families, friends, even enemies who would expose them, do not simply vanish utterly off the face of the world. We know Obama came from the absolute worst possible social and political background imaginable for a US president: communist parents; communist "mentor" who was almost certainly Obama's biological father, Frank Marshall Davis (see our graphic analysis at the sister site, www.evidencevault.blogspot.com); friends Bill Ayres and Ayres' wife, Bernadine Dorn, who was the leader of the radical communist terrorist group, "Weather Underground"; a pastor from all available whom Obama chose who has become famous for standing inside his own House of God and uttering the profanity "God damn America" - and did so angrily, like an unhinged madman. Obama has also advocated infanticide for babies who survive abortions. With that history it seems not only possible but increasingly likely that Obama has had those unwanted survivor witnesses from Benghazi killed and who-knows-what to their friends and families. People don't just vanish for the better part of a year - at least one of those people or someone close to them wants the million dollar book deal. Someone wants the truth to be said. Someone should be prompted by a friend or family member to speak up. So far the best scenario we have heard - from Congress - is that the witnesses are too terrified of Obama to speak, and it is becoming apparent that those terrified witnesses, like the three who testified last week, are not survivors of Benghazi. When any official, like now-Secretary of State Kerry, is asked about the survivors, the conversation becomes immediately awkward and unconvincing. Benghazi-Truth is extremely concerned for the safety of those survivors, and they need to be brought forward with protection to testify immediately or we need to be told in no uncertain terms what happened to them that they cannot do just that.
5. We know that while Hillary recovers from concussions she spends her months of recovery compiling a dictionary-sized ring-binder of prepared answers from which she reads when she testifies 'spontaneously" about her role in what happened on the night of Benghazi and thereafter. We also know Hillary cracks badly under intense pressure, as we saw in the hearings when the first time happened that she has ever had to face any pressure without a complicit media to protect her. Her desperate outburst of "What difference does it make" will go down in history as both a joke and dire lesson from history: don't let politicians lead too easy a life in the public eye, because they will become ill-prepared for just such moments.
6. We know that GOP Speak Boehner should never have been reinstated as Speaker. He is at odds now with more than 2/3 of the house GOP majority as well as the most prominent Republican Senators by blocking what was afforded Nixon and led to Nixon's resignation: a House Oversight Select Committee. Basically, appointing such a thing is Boehner's most important single function because that opens the door to the subpoena power and collective minds grouped together to investigate and prosecute the Administration for the deaths in Benghazi. However, Boehner, whose violent, uncontrolled public sobbing is clearly indicative of mental illness, will not turn the tables on his new golfing pal, the president he is constitutionally sworn to investigate, Barack Obama. As it stands now, Boehner is almost certainly heading toward a vote of no confidence by his own House majority and removal as Speaker. The word we get from several congressional offices is that 30 GOP House Reps may confront Boehner on the issue of his dereliction of duty and if that occurs, Boehner is likely to resign as Speaker and possibly as a House Representative. The rumor we hear is that Boehner is now a complete emotional wreck and headed for some kind of dramatic political moment.
7. Via recent testimony before Congress, three "Whistleblowers" confirmed that the Benghazi Annex was under-secured and a draw down was continued from the Obama Administration rather than increasing security; that Ambassador Stevens cried for help and was ignored; military men were livid at the "stand down" order preventing them from helping protect our people and that career workers in Washington have been threatened and demoted for so much as questioning what happened in Benghazi that night and afterward.
We know so much more, such as the fact that the families of the slain have been told nothing about the specifics of their loved ones' deaths, who the leaders are in Congress and who are the cowards, and so forth.
As of this evening, we know from sources that 144 GOP Reps have signed onto Representative Frank Wolf's House resolution HR36, demanding a House select Committee on Benghazi.
Oh, yes, we also know something else as well, perhaps the most important lesson thus far of all from Benghazi: anyone who trusts Barack Obama with their life needs to have their head examined, because if he doesn't kill you, it seems certain he will leave you to die. That lesson needs to be learned by those who still support and admire Obama, as Ambassador Stevens supported and admired Obama before Obama spoke with Leon Panetta at 5 PM on the day of the attacks and then turned his back for the rest of the day and night, leaving Stevens, the other murdered three and the other 33 to die. The only reason those 33 may still be alive - somewhere - is that two brave men gave their lives saving them. If they had not disobeyed Obama's orders to let those people die, then those 33 surely would have died then, and that's now a clear and obvious fact.
SELECT COMMITTEE. INVESTIGATE. PROSECUTE. IMPEACH. IMPRISON. Yes, IMPRISON, because if the Watergate buglers went to prison for a politically motivated break-in harming no one, surely there are those in the Administration who are guilty of much worse when it comes to Benghazi.
On a personal note, I want to thank all the people who have become TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS and joined in the twitter activity 7 days a week to keep Benghazi up front in the public consciousness. You have been more important than you know in getting the investigation in congress and media momentum going on Benghazi. We are now getting quiet thanks via PMs and e-mails from certain congressional offices thanking the Tea Party Fire Ants for their efforts and claiming we have been invaluable in this fight. Give yourselves a big round of applause. You deserve it. Okay, that's enough! - we not done yet. We can win this fight, both moral and political, on Benghazi. Indeed, at this point, it would take a miracle to not win it. We've waited a long time for this. Let's get back to it and finish the job.
*****************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday, April 29, 2013
IT'S TIME TO TURN UP THE HEAT. As you know from the last Memo, Kathy Amidon successfully outed Boehner's motivation for keeping from a vote HR36 - a bill designed to initiate a Select House Committee (like the one that got Nixon more or less impeached) - about Benghazi; amazingly, Boehner, a supposed Republican, is refusing to initiate the legal mechanism which would investigate Obama, a Democrat, because he knows the bill would pass on the floor of the House. In other words, denying the majority will of the people through their elected Representatives to have Obama investigated on Benghazi. So far more than half of all republicans have signed onto this bill - 129, a huge number well in excess of the "Hastert Rule".
This kind of fawning, sycophantic behavior toward Obama on Boehner's part has had GOP tongues wagging for months creating speculation of the motivation of Boehner protecting Obama from Boehner being threatened by Obama to being mentally ill (Benghazi-Truth's opinion based on Boehner's repeated uncontrollable public sobbing over the slimmest of reasons is that he is mentally ill, and Obama's people have experts in psychology guiding Obama on how to manipulate a person in Boehner's particular psychological state, which basically would wrap it all up these questions in one jigsaw puzzle completed).
But even if Boehner is half-crazy, the other half of him isn't, and even a moron can understand when his career is in jeopardy via public opinion, so in today's memo I am going to show you all how to do exactly what Kathy did - easily and entirely legally.
First, it's easy to imagine people saying, "Why are you putting such a dramatically powerful heretofore unused political weapon into the public hands? Might it not be misused by the liberal democrats against conservatives?" The answer to that is easy: it is the Democrats who have secrets to hide and Conservative Republicans who are in desperate need of having the truth be shared between each other and the world. The imbalance is so outrageous that the proportionality isn't even worth discussing.
The second question you might ask is, "Why Boehner?! He's a Republican! He's one of our guys " Well, I would disagree with all of that except his party affiliation. Indeed, our party, the Republican party, is so fragmented because of feckless country-clubbers like Boehner who play get-along while the leftists beat the living stuffing out of us that liberals have been able to exploit those divisions, driving some conservatives to start chattering stupidly about "third parties" while we know that any party that divides the right becomes the instant election victory card for every single democrat in the United States of America. The point here is we need to rein in our own before moving ahead against the enemy. This means putting a fire under the lazy get-along Republicans and get them to stop wandering the halls aimlessly and set them to their jobs with the kind of intensity that only comes with public awareness and pressure and the very immediate fear of losing an easy lifestyle that comes with that awareness and pressure. There is no point in doing this to Democrats because the media will cover for them. But if we do it to our own - Republicans - so they know a challenger awaits them in the next set of election primaries, maybe, just maybe, we can wake them up and get them off their butts. And that is what this is about, because once you eliminate the media cover and the lazy, timid behavior of the Congressional GOP, you strip away all of Obama's protection and the fact is he is perhaps the most politically - and legally - vulnerable President in the history of the United States: the economy because of his policies is a disaster, we are under regular attack by Islamic terrorists, this birth record is a criminal forgery, his background is a socio-political nightmare and he is - and here's where gets gets particularly important - almost certainly 100% responsible for the deaths of the people in Benghazi and apparently definitely responsible for the silencing and who-knows-what-else of the 33 Benghazi survivor-witnesses he clearly does not want to see testify. If Obama is impeached because of that the democrat party and media will be left in a smoking ruin and as conservatives that is just exactly what our target objective should and must be to restore the country as we think it should be. So we have to get our guys rolling.
What I am about to show you how to do should strike absolute terror into all but those with the most responsible congressional records. I want you to do it. The founding fathers want you to do it. The ghosts of the Benghazi dead want you to do it. The 33 silenced witnesses want you to do it. And future generations will thank you for doing it. You will be doing it to republicans. You will be doing it to expose them to appropriate public scrutiny to frighten them into doing their jobs.You are their boss. Literally. This is nothing more or less than the taxpayer/elected official version of a boss showing the worker something he said and did and demonstrating he or she has the power to have that elected official fired. No politician wants what will be said on the telephone to be broadcast to the world. That is what you are going to do, and they will become afraid for their careers and lifestyles and Benghazi will get the Nixon times ten treatment that it deserves and with God's help America will be set right again. That's the plan. Don't let your countrymen down.
1.IS IT LEGAL? That depends on where you live. What allows this is the "One Party Consent" law, which varies from State to State. All but 12 states allow recording a conversation if you, basically, agree with yourself it can be done and are a party to the conversation (recording a conversation in which you are not a part is called wiretapping and is not at all legal, but as long as you are doing part of the talking which is recorded it's legal).
The states in which it is not legal: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada (needs to be an emergency, otherwise, no), New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Vermont (There is no state law on this and federal law allows it, but it's included here to be safe about it), Washington State (not DC, the US Capitol, where it is legal, and to whom most of your calls in this matter are likely to be directed) and Illinois.
IT IS LEGAL TO RECORD CONVERSATIONS IN WHICH YOU ARE A PART IN ALL OTHER STATES.
If you want additional reading or proof that you are not being led astray somehow by this blog, read these:
http://www.aapsonline.org/judicial/telephone.htm
http://www.dmlp.org/book/export/html/1246
Are you allowed to make these conversations public? As long as you are calling a public office about public business, the answer is clearly a resounding yes. We're not a communist country.
http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130402/OPINION16/304020009/Can-public-business-private-conversation-
2.RECORDING IS EASY.
YOU NEED:
1. A speaker phone.
Do you have a speaker phone option on your land line or cell phone? If not, a new speaker phone can be had cheap at Best Buy (you only need to plug it into an existing outlet, you don't need a new phone line)
2. A computer with a recording option as part of your built-in accessories (it's hard to imagine one in the last ten years that doesn't this is standard built-in stuff, so take a peek and see if you have it). You find it by going to Start > All Programs > Accessories (yellow folder icon) > Sound recorder. If you have a desk PC you might need a separate microphone. If you have a laptop it is almost certain your laptop has one build in. It's easy enough to check, turn the sound recorder on and start talking. Play it back. It's safe, no one else will hear it, it's within your own computer. If you hear yourself your laptop is like most and has a built-ion microphone.
So if you have a laptop, all you need is a speaker phone option on your home phone or cell phone. That's all you need.
3. HOW TO DO IT.
Start recording. Dial the number. Ask Boehner's lacky (or whomever) what the rep's position is on House Resolution 36 for a Select Committee on Benghazi. You don't need to be Mike Wallace about it, so don't let lack of confidence deter you. Just do it.
4. YOUTUBE
This is so simple you have no idea. Go to www.youtube.com. Click "Sign In". Open the "Create account" or "Registration" option and just fill it in. This can be done by a novice in 5 minutes. Don't let assumptions about it being too difficult stop you - little kids can do. Try it. Simple. Then you will see a button called "Upload". Follow the prompts and click on the file you recorded (probably automatically saved to "My music" or "My video"). If you cannot upload, contact Kathy or myself on Twitter (@Kathy_Amidon or @FrankMDavisJR) and we'll sort it out in 2 minutes.
DO IT.
It probably won't take many of these audio/videos, maybe only three or four, before a very alarmed GOP House moves as fast as possible on Benghazi so this sudden power of the people is not felt so well by the people that Congress winds up having to deal with it forever; they would throw Obama under the bus in two seconds if they thought that was their future.
So there you have it. It's really simple once you start to do it. Just let the first step be followed by the next and you'll be amazed how simple it is.
Conservatives have been crying and pleading for fatcat radio hosts to bestow salvation upon them. Guess what? You don't need them. You can fix this damn problem for yourselves, easily. Remember, our nationally-covered FOX boycott resulted in FOX suddenly deciding that Benghazi was a bit important as opposed to not important at all - big change. Not long after the boycott got traction One America TV network announced it was coming on the air (coincidence to the boycott or causation? Who can tell?) and a week after I publicly suggested to Chuck Woolery that his agent should contact the Washington Times for a gig with them the Washington Times announced it was signing him. The point is that you have influence and power that you don't know you have, and it works. I can assure you that recording House member office phone calls and posting them on YouTube will get them moving on Benghazi and Obama's prosecution so fast it will be blinding. Trust me. Media is my business. I've been right before.
Boehner's DC Office number is
(202) 225-6205
I'm looking forward to hearing all your great calls on YouTube. Let the restoration of America begin!
***************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Saturday, April 27, 2013
WHAT IS UP with Speaker John Boehner?! That's been the question on the lips of most conservatives for months, particularly since the advent of the murders by Islamic terrorists of Americans in Benghazi. In the interests of full disclosure, it must be said up front that Benghazi Truth was never a fan of Boehner years before there was an incident, quite frankly, in Benghazi:
Since Benghazi, as Obama's culpability has become more clear, Boehner appears transparently determined to replace the clearing fog with downright obfuscation and cover-up. We have written here before about Boehner's utterly apparent infatuation with Obama; he quietly reprimands the President as he is expected to do as the leader of the opposition, but with no force. Countered with bizarre public expressions of admiration for Obama's very presence - he truly takes on the face of a star-struck child gazing adoringly at a hero, we've all seen it, there's no point in being coy about it - Boehner's behavior has been easy to predict: he covers for Obama.
But prediction in the form of speculation and supposition are not the same as having a fact; a cold, hard fact in hand on which the sunlight glints and there is no vague mystery about it. However, thanks to Tea Party Fire Ants' Twitter team leader, the amazing and no-fooling-around Kathy Amidon, we essentially have that cold fact in hand.
Abiding by the legal demands of the One Party Consent Rule, which allows telephone conversations in most states to be recorded without the person on the other end being aware, Kathy called and recorded conversations with a person who calls himself "Rick" who answers the phone in not one but two of Boehner's offices - somehow. Rick in my opinion had some very interesting things to say, as you can hear. Rick, to begin with, denies answering the phone for two offices when he does just that, and Kathy catches him at it. Rick says a select committee would cost a great deal of money, but Frank Wolf rightly cites that it would cost nothing additional in the budget, since the allocations are there already and would otherwise go partially unused. But it gets worse. Much worse. And this is what is so important: Rick admits twice, speaking on behalf of Boehner, that if Boehner brought HR36 to the floor, it would pass! Of course it would, HR36 has 126 co-sponsors (most bills have two or three co-sponsors, so Boehner is really swimming against the tide)
Here is Kathy's audio recording with the two "Rick" conversations. Listen carefully, as Rick clearly has his marching orders from Boehner on how to handle such calls and therefore in effect speaks for Boehner as directly as anyone besides Boehner himself ever could:
So what do we have here? Just an argumentative lackey? No. Rick's job is to speak on behalf of Boehner when people call. Rick says that if HR36 was brought to the floor, it would pass, and then launches into a highly debatable point-of-view about hypothetical expended resources. What Rick does not do is admit his boss Boehner is thwarting the will of the American people and that is just exactly what Boehner is doing. All those other House Reps who Rick - speaking directly for Boehner - admits would cause HR36 to pass were each themselves elected. In that respect they are each and all equal to Boehner in the eyes of the Constitution. They are exactly what their title suggests: they are representatives. They represent the people in their individual districts. Each was elected to carry out the will of those who voted them into office. Each Rep vote speaks for many thousands of people. By denying HR36 to be brought to the floor because he feels he knows best on the merits of his own opinion when 126 of his peers representing about 30% of the total American population of 300 million citizens, he denies those people their chance to speak and be heard though their Representatives on the floor of the House.
There is a well-worn colloquial term for this which should signal the loudest possible alarm: it's literally called "tyranny", and it is real and it is manifest and it is happening and it is now. And it must be stopped immediately. I'm not being melodramatic; one man stopping all others from having their will heard and obeyed as a collective is what our Founding Fathers and earliest citizens suffered, fought and often died for.
We - the Tea Party Fire Ants - are working with Tea Party members in Boehner's district to send him a message, but if Boehner's office mouthpiece Rick speaks accurately for his boss, then faster, more immediate legal measures need to be taken.
It is our growing opinion that we all need to work the Twitter accounts of every influential House Representative to demand and successfully have an awkward but now entirely obviously necessary vote of no confidence for Boehner and have him removed as Speaker. We don't have years to screw around - this must be done now.
Whether covering for Obama or truly concerned about the measures of expense in a Select Committee it's entirely possible he simply does not understand, it is now, as of today, essentially proven that he is using his power to silence and unconstitutionally deny the voice of the American people by using raw, arrogant power to try to impede the most basic mechanism of our republic - the vote - to prevent from passage a bill which has more co-sponsors than most ten bills - which see a floor vote - rolled together.
Boehner must be convinced to allow HR36 to be voted on or must somehow have the gavel legally removed from his hand essentially immediately or ASAP. Obama rules by unconstitutional Executive Order and Boehner seems to be cut from the same cloth, following Obama's lead.
By any legal means necessary Boehner must be thwarted so the machinery of our American system can be allowed to resume. Don't be shy. It's time to get angry and it's time to get loud:
BOEHNER HAS GOT TO GO.
***********************
ON A LIGHTER BUT SINCERE NOTE:
*******************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Tuesday, April 23, 2013
TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS & Benghazi Updates:
We never really keep you readers apprised of all the little goings-on half behind the scenes, and usually assume, I guess, that you keep a notebook or something on Twitter, I suppose, which is neither appropriate nor fair. So I'll be keeping a semi-regular log here from now on of details and the more minute kind of advancements that most other news and blog sites herald with great but undeserved fanfare. So we'll report them here, but won't insult your intelligence with any fanfare except fanfare which is a bit perhaps more deserved and therefore doesn't insult your intelligence. There is a bit of cagey detail kept hidden because we don't want to tip our strategic hand too much to the trolls.
Speaking of trolls we'll start with them: What we see of them attacking the Fire Ants is diminished to next to nothing. They make very loud noise on Twitter but are at this point mostly yelling at each other. This is due in part clearly to the post here which outed their methodology which very obviously rattled them and left them wanting for direction, as their wall activities and aggressive manner have been gigantically diminished, as you may have noticed. This helps not only the Fire Ants but all conservative groups and causes online, so don't be shy about calling them out with the info about how they operate online provided to you a few articles down from this one. You are not in an online chat fest, you are in a war to save America. Please learn the info and don't be shy about using it.
For the Fire Ants specifically, we have found that simply citing our media coverage drives the trolls back into their caves and back under their bridges. The simple and plain fact is that we have the credibility via that coverage to show we - the Tea Party Fire Ants - are a force for real conservatism - and you do have to be plenty conservative to boycott FOX even if they have gone left as they have, because all of pop culture from the left is telling you to follow leftist FOX, now, and shut up about it or they'll make fun of you. But the trolls have no accomplishment or media cred, and throwing that comparison into their faces makes them go away.
On another front, we are now witnessing a new tactic from trolls intermixed with some plain opportunists and that is the sudden formation - out of nowhere, with no media cred and no history - of "Conservative groups" asking for recruits and often money. Don't be a sucker. For example, all we ask is your time and dedication to call put media and GOP weaklings on Twitter uncensored, before the world and that is working so well 1 million people have boycotted FOX due to our efforts on that front alone. There are larger established groups like the Tea Party Express that can use donations, so don't go giving your money and sit back hoping for a payoff. The trolls creating new groups are up to the obvious; trying to siphon off as much of those 1 million people you joined us in the FOX boycott as possible not to do other conservative things but to keep you chasing your tail; one of their great effective strategies has been to pay people to rally others into meaningless activities of chat, letters and petitions that go nowhere while Obama does what he wants with America.
By the way, I forgot to mention in the troll article that 12,000 - 16,000 immediate followers, immediate hits, etc, is a tip-off number that an operation is being run by ACORN-style trolls; that number comes up time and again, for years, in groups and people who are proven to be working for the other side, so we assume that is the number of names, people or identities online paid for by people like Soros who are operating to send the right off-course with this BS. If they read this that number may change. But, as an example, I was directed to some guy with all the stereotypes on youtube: cowboy hat, twang, silver beard - all the right-wing stereotypes of what a conservative "hero" looks like in the mind of an elite liberal from the city, and he is "recruiting" for a new group with positively insanely absurd talking points, and how many Youtube hits did he get out of nowhere? Bingo, the magic 15,000. I'm not condemning this guy publicly yet, but I'm getting close; he fits every troll profile point you could have, right down to whistling up the magic number out of nowhere.
Immodestly, whether you join with us or do it on your own, Fire Ant Twitter activity has proven to be the most powerful grassroots way to effect big media and lawmakers. Newsweek, MSN, The NY Daily News, etc didn't cover TEA PARTY FIRE ANT activities in boycotting FOX because we weren't being effective - they freaked out because they saw the same ratings we did and saw we were being gigantically effective - and went after us, initially Newsweek, all of 2 days after the FOX ratings had been released. One assumes they expected us to wilt under their smarm but they instead managed a perfect unintentional campaign to skyrocket the Fire Ants into the public spotlight where things have never been better.
If you don't know, being with the Tea Party Fire Ants costs nothing, you don't need to sign up or be a premium member or anything else - just follow @Kathy_Amidon (I'll add other names soon) and the rest takes care of itself. So if anyone asks you to donate or work with a "New Conservative Group", ask them why they aren't working with the Fire Ants on Twitter for free first, since we have the media and proven results measured in millions, and then do whatever else they are talking about after that. If their answer is defense, hyperbolic, insulting to us, then the answer stinks, then so do they, and IMO you should use your time to better effect calling out media and lawmakers on Twitter, with Fire Ants or alone or with other friends, because it works. It works big-time.
Remember, public awareness is everything to media and politicians both, and for now, Twitter, with open communication and no censorship - the only place anywhere on the internet where that is possible for conservatives - is the key. That's not theory: we've proved it. Just ask Newsweek and don't believe that any wholly grassroots group not covered and attacked by left media as we have been is anywhere near as effective as one who has - and that's the Tea Party Fire Ants. Let other grassroots groups prove themselves like we did for many months before wasting your time reaching for the stars with lofty rhetoric and slim and meaningless action plans (like boycotting businesses with groups of only 5 people per store instead of reaching millions every day on twitter. I do believe in tea party rallies with hundreds of people by the thousands all over America, but groups of 5 is a plan hatched only in the collective mind of ACORN to make all conservatives look small and crazy).
Expanding on this new success and the influence that comes with it, we have started very successfully communicating with Tea Party group leaders all over America. The plan is simple: put some real local teeth into our warnings to GOP congressmen that being weak on Benghazi means losing the lazy and austere lifestyle feckless lawmakers value in Washington. This is best done by arranging for them to take some verbal body blows to that effect from their local constituents as well as the Fire Ants on Twitter. When they hear that people from their districts are planning rallies in the town square against them in favor of a tea party conservative primary challenger, only the dumbest will refuse to meet our demands to put Benghazi under a national microscope with Obama as the central bacterium. We don't ask for much: just give to Obama what democrats gave to Nixon on Watergate proportionate to the crime: In the case of Benghazi, Watergate multiplied by a factor of about of 10,000.
On a nice note, Representative Frank Wolf's office has already asked us to thank all you Fire Ants for helping to get so many more signers to Wolf's HR36 to form a Select Committee to investigate Benghazi A couple of new groups are trying to take credit for that and their claims are absolute bullshit; everyone knows that on a grassroots internet basis, that achievement came from this board and the Tea Party Fire Ants on twitter, 100%. No one else was doing Benghazi as a group effort until we came along, and we are having the same effect on HR36 that we had with the FOX boycott: success. I will take it on faith that I have your permission to speak for you when I say here to Frank Wolf's office, "You're welcome". I think HR36 now has about 112 co-sponsors. Let's make that 100% among the GOP in the House and try to get some democrats from politically centered districts as well.
We need to do more to convince Speaker Boehner to cut the country club back-slapping with Obama and get serious about his job but I'll save that for the next time.
God bless. See you tonight on Twitter, whichever night for you is "tonight".
~ Frank / Proe.
************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Thursday, April 18, 2013
THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING (And now, possibly,a bombing in Texas): THE CONSEQUENCE OF IGNORING BENGHAZI.
Doubtless, Obama, now proving himself to be the worst of possible political players, will posture vengeful over Boston while, like with silencing the Benghazi witnesses, will do everything he can to hide the facts that would otherwise bring the terrorists to justice.
...to reverend Jeremiah Wright, whose seething "God Damn America" church sermons evoke a seeming mental illness so intense, IMO, as to be shocking he hasn't been literally institutionalized and the key thrown away.
The only thing Obama apparently has in common with those people, who live a seemingly single-minded existence, is a boiling, insatiable intrinsic hatred of the United States of America. Obama even refused to salute the American flag while other leftist democrats did, until, like leaving Wright's church, political necessity forced him -eventually - to do so.
It remains Benghazi Truth's opinion that Obama is very obviously guilty of intentional negligent homicide regarding Benghazi, as the only way Obama could not have saved those killed in Benghazi, with much forewarning of danger and the resources of the most powerful nation on earth, is if he simply wanted them dead.
Indeed, even the scenes of carnage in Boston resemble Benghazi
Obama has hidden the 33 Benghazi witnesses from prying eyes for 7 1/2 months, although new Secretary of State John Kerry now claims to know who the witnesses are - a delay tactic in my opinion to keep the steam pot of this outrage from boiling over. Our old pal Dana Rohrabacher, who has continued to demand no subpoenas - which is clearly crazy if you want to get to the bottom of all this - at least opened his mouth a bit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARBEGk0UZOQ
Perhaps he did so because of this image by us, now going viral on Twitter to millions. Rohrabacher is the one in the middle.
Make no mistake, any and all who have gone weak on Benghazi have on their hands the blood of those killed in the Boston Marathon bombing and that of those who may still die from their wounds from the Boston Marathon Bombing. All those who lost limbs - and there were several - have their ruined lives hanging over Obama, but for us, worse, hanging over all those in the GOP who did little or nothing to hold Obama accountable for Benghazi. This includes FOX NEWS and radio hosts like Sean Hannity, who had the gall to ask where the public outcry was regarding Benghazi, as though he didn't know the reason the Tea Party Fire Ants led a boycott against FOX which has so far reduced FOX'S ratings by 33% is because hosts like Hannity have given so little attention to Benghazi, the political outrage of this century. Hannity in my opinion is now proving to be nothing more than a manipulative con man, preaching patriotism with one side of his mouth and keeping the truth bunched up on the other. The sooner Hannity is no longer associated with the right wing of America the better. Send a message to the media and boycott him until he's back to washing dishes again. "Friends" like him we can do without.
And as of this morning, we now have this: an explosion in a fertilizer plant in Texas which may or may not also be the work of terrorists.
WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW TO HELP:
1. Boycott FOX. They made an announced decision to turn left and kept the promise. Hanging onto them and begging them for help is a pathetic course of action inappropriate for anyone with any sense of self-dignity whatsoever. Demand FOX turn right and turn them off until word comes around online that they have.
2. Support soon-to-arrive One America Tea Party news network and let them know we boycotted FOX so successfully with national exposure. Let them know we'll do the same to them before they even get off the ground if they play games like FOX. You can contact them this way, it seems (from their website):
Contact One America News Network
Herring Broadcasting, Inc.
The "WealthTV" Network
4757 Morena Blvd, San Diego, CA 92117
Phone: (858) 270-6900
Fax: (858) 270-6901
3. Join the TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS every night on twitter from 7 PM EST onward and let the GOP and media know we will continue to out them in public on Twitter, where no possible censorship exists to keep millions of people from seeing us tell the truth about them to the world. Follow @Kathy_Amidon every night at 7 PM, EST.
We did this:
We will do much more until Benghazi is investigated and prosecuted and we have a right-wing media that tells the truth for a change. It will be a long battle, but our successes so far have been amazingly large and quick in happening. Next we are working with local Tea Parties all over America to start sending the message to the House of Representatives in the same way we boycotted FOX: via their core audience - in the case of the House Reps, the constituents they need to get re-elected, and the message is this: throw your back visibly into Benghazi or be gone - via us - in 2014.
If you ever wanted to join a group where things actually get done in a hurry, join with the TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS on Twitter. We mean business and we're getting things done for justice for those slain in Benghazi, for the future solvency of America, to help avoid more Boston Bombings by getting tough on Benghazi, now.
Get active today. You have a country to save.
*********************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Friday, April 12, 2013
**TRIBUTE TO REPRESENTATIVE FRANK WOLF**
 |
| REP FRANK WOLF |
Enter Representative Frank Wolf. By no means a junior member of the House of representatives, and while he gets his time on TV to be sure, he nevertheless does not attract the camera and talk circuit like some others, probably because the media knows that unlike the others, no one means business on Benghazi like Representative Frank Wolf.
Most people who are even aware of Benghazi - and it's damn few in an open-media society such as the United States - may now know of Wolf because of his House resolution HR36 which demands a House Select Committee to investigate Benghazi (it was a Select Committee which ended Richard Nixon's Presidency over Watergate), with eighty-some-odd fellow House Representatives signed on as co-sponsors (a very large number to be sure).
In his most recent press conference, covered by not even FOX NEWS, Wolf announces truly huge news: a letter to all of Congress demanding a Select Committee (this apart from HR36) signed by no fewer than 700 retired special ops forces experts (such a thing has never been done in US history, lest anyone fail to understand the breadth of this accomplishment). This video - the only one of this announcement, has gotten so few hits - only 300 as of this writing - that this blog's server cannot even locate it to embed into this server, and must rely on the link. If ever there was an illustration to condemn our media, especially the one that pretends to speak for the right, FOX NEWS, it is the fact that no one covered this event. The lack of coverage does not condemn Wolf's efforts as left trolls would doubtless infer, it condemns the media, for any political history truly made is worthy of a mention at least - unless you are shilling for Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKhwvsXhX8w
Skipping back past many press conferences and TV appearances about the need for a select Committee on Benghazi, here is Representative Frank Wolf calling for a Select Committee back on Nov 11, 2012.
As the above video shows, Wolf is no Johnny-come-lately to Benghazi, but understood the need for a Select Committee long before Hillary had a supposed concussion, after which and for months, supposedly from her sick bed, she compiled a Webster's College Dictionary-sized book of embarrassingly pre-prepared responses and didn't testify, then did testify always and only ever from that book and told the world the past was not relevant and no one should be held to account for the death of a US Ambassador denied saving by a President who had the power and authority to do so...
Indignant and enraged, Hillary "spontaneously" waves a fist as she "testifies", reading line-by-line from her Giant Golden Book of carefully contrived legalistic responses; a scene so pathetically phony, the only thing worse is the media's blind eye and deaf ear to call her out on it, FOX NEWS included.
Representative Wolf knew of the need for a Select Committee when these talking heads from Congress did everything except what they needed to do.... something! (including demanding a Select Committee)
Representative Frank Wolf knew of the need for a Select Committee on Benghazi before, during and after John Boehner, a sad-faced sycophant of a Speaker, weak and without resolve on this matter to a staggering degree, and possibly suffering from clinical depression manifest by uncontrolled sobbing in public venues chummed it up regularly with Barack Obama; Obama who refused our people help after he had trapped them in a country from which only he could provide an escape and turned his back on them when the angel of death was clear and apparent and eventually killed them.
There is only one Representative Frank Wolf, but he has eighty-something fellow Reps co-sponsoring HR36, seven-hundred Special Ops signing a letter to endorse it and because of that, millions of Americans supporting him and his efforts - Americans who are growing increasingly fed-up with everyone else in Congress. He also has the support of this blog and all the people/ Tea Party Fire Ants who boycotted FOX down to its lowest ratings in twelve years for turning left-wing by Ailes' own admission and going soft on Obama - and we have already started coordinating with Tea Party chapters all over America to challenge weak sitting GOP candidates in the 2014 primaries with true conservatives - and like with FOX, we're going to succeed; We mean business.
Ordinarily I would say we need a dozen Representative Frank Wolfs. But maybe one is enough. We salute him.
*********************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
EDIT 1: People by the score have asked me in PM & DM to keep this Memo at the top of the page so they can get this information out to the larger population of conservatives. That makes sense and is appreciated. Therefore, this will remain at the top at least through Wed, 4/10/2013
Filed for Sat, April 6, 2013 -
Thursday, April 11, 2013
They are everywhere, well-funded and often effective against the unwary: liberal trolls pretending to be conservatives to manipulate true conservatives. We have dealt with them for the last few years, and outed a few who, when their cover was blown, went down flaming, "LOL"ing how the conservatives would be destroyed and socialism would win. As fake conservatives, they always find a way to derail decisive action with ideological masquerading, and attack effective conservatives making headway and accuse them of not being pure enough, and each attack is backed up by the appearance of a dozen "friends" of theirs you never saw before playing yes-man to their attacks.
Liberal ACORN-style trolls have a few easily-recognizable approaches and we know this "officially" because I've read notes taken from a reliable source with access to their marching orders in places where people sit in small offices and are paid to do one thing: make the conservatives ineffective on the internet (I am not the first to report on these places; this is well-known).
We're going to blow their cover right now, mention a few names and render them useless if you follow these simple guidelines. This is how guys like Soros spend a fraction of their political money: running places like that.
THE TYPES
EDIT 2: Here is a very specific type of liberal troll pretending to be conservative I initially forgot: the "conservative" who complains bitterly about boycotting FOX NEWS even though they know our intention is to force FOX back to the right-wing, and they mock and condemn upcoming Tea Party-oriented news network One America. Does that sound like a conservative to you? No, I didn't think so. Me neither.
Here's a rundown of the basic variety.
These people are not Tea Party people who believe in small government or Obama's birth certificate issue - that's not what I mean by "purist". These "purists" are people for whom purity is only ever realized by doing things that ensure GOP defeat. They take up much space on message boards, Facebook and Twitter loudly endorsing un-electible candidates with no name recognition on third party tickets to split the Republican vote and open the door for the democrat to win. They proclaim that their "vote is too important to waste on a RINO" as though voting is a religious experience (No one hates RINOS more than I, but we live in an imperfect world. If after the primaries we fail on any given state or district and are stuck with a RINO, you vote for the RINO over the democrat. Sometimes there is scant little to distinguish them, but it does help the GOP maintain a majority where elected Tea Party House and Senate members can help drive the nation agenda instead of sitting in the back seat to democrats). One now-famous line from these people: "I am tired of voting for the lesser of two evils". I have news for any actual conservative who might actually agree with this absurd notion: human perfection exists only in Jesus Christ, and the last I heard, he isn't running.
The operative excuse for this fake is "Oops". "Oops, I did not mean to send the thread off-topic when any idiot would know better". "Oops, I forgot how to do basic things when it really mattered." "Oops, I know better than TOPOSTLIKETHISANDMAKESPELLINGERRORS and make the entire operation look stupid but I do it anyway and always when a thread is catching fire and helping the conservative cause." Don't assume these people are well-meaning; handle it like a job: say "Please post using proper form and English or don't post with us because you are making us look bad." There is always collateral damage in any war and accidental friendly fire, but if you said that to them, the chances are 95% that you just eliminated a troll working from the inside to blunt the effect of your collective efforts. This isn't theory: we know some are ordered to operate like this.
"I love ya, darlin'!" "Happy Birthday, sweety, you're the best!". Nice words, but when they come from someone represented to be some kind of leader, like, in my strongly-held opinion Dakota R on Twitter, who then poisonously attacks in the same breath people getting the work done and not just running on a twitter treadmill of love-speak and pompous complaining, then you have just run into a particularly nasty troll variety. Set on high by other operatives and people falling in with them unknowingly, this is a Troll for whom conservative political activist accomplishment is never apparent but the appearance is that other trolls treat that person like a God.
This type invariably writes in a pathetic stereotype of what elite liberals think conservatives to be: twangy hicks. Basically, this kind of operative is an anchor for the others. The anchor lies, the operatives say, "So and so said so!" and they all "Ooooh" and "Ahhhh" in unison and condemn the guilty party on the authority of the anchor. If you watch carefully only one form of behavior meets their lofty standard: complaining about nothing that hurts Obama but creating a venue to loudly complain about anything that does not hurt Obama, giving the participants a way to blow off steam and feel like they are being productive while politically hurting Obama not one bit.
Once you start to get things done, watch your back. We have seen this kind over and over and they play rough. Indeed, they are after this group now with a passion since our nation-wide media recognition for boycotting FOX to get FOX to turn hard right and therefore once again become a threat to Obama. Our boycotts are working, putting pressure on FOX to be a threat to Obama, and so then, too, do we become a threat to Obama. And that's just too damn bad.
This type is particularly nasty because it's the head of a troll snake that sets the agenda. You will see clearly how this works in two primary ways:
A. They find ways to play the role of victim against the retaliation of people they have suckered into an angry response to their unilateral first attack. In other words, they attack first, the victim responds, then the attacker complains bitterly and pretends to be the victim. From there all the otherwise invisible operatives pile on, defending the "innocent Troll 3", attempt to destroy the "offender" - the hapless guy who was targeted in the first place - and then vanish again.
B. They find every possible cause to rally, occupy time and otherwise keep the heat off Obama. It's always a matter of, "So and so is in twitmo! Get them out!". "So and so attacked me!" "So and so is not really a conservative!" But never, "Let's tweet media and congress for a select committee to prosecute Obama". Never, "Demand FOX turn right to keep the pressure on Obama." Never, "Let's help other groups that are doing these proven-effective first two things." In other words, they engage their group participants to lead meaningless rant sessions about Obama but never to actively coordinate to raise public awareness about his scandals, suggest activity to engage the actions of the congress or anything else that hurts Obama.
4. MR. / MRS. PASSIVE/AGGRESSIVE
Anyone who, in effect, says the following; "NO! Be good conservatives! Be nice! Don't engage in activity that makes us look bad! Do everything with the best possible good manners and heartfelt consideration for the liberal democrats!" because as you can read, that is what it all amounts to - making democrats happy.
The combination Christian/girl-next-door/siren promising love, agreement, companionship and delights. All at once supposedly devout to Jesus, flirtatious, fawning to men and sporting a picture of an attractive-to-beautiful girl with a supposed "real name and face", these are perhaps the most obvious and clearly deliberate characters they have created. One may have a picture of Angelina Jolie, for example, and assures the world that they/she look "just like her". Those who are trolls under disguise are usually older gray-pony-tailed liberals who have not bathed in a month, snatching pics off dating sites and the like to lure in the lonely. I outed an obvious one myself on a message board a few years ago, and they "Bwahahah"'d as they called conservatives "losers" before his/her identity vanished. Doubtless he came back again within an hour under a new, innocent identity. Make no mistake, they don't just sucker in conservatives; there are many lonely liberal guys out there convinced the "girl" admires them for their mind and doing what the admiring girl is telling them to do, unaware that the person on the other end stinks of old cigarettes and male sweat. So who's the sucker then? This is not a new trick; the only twist is that Mata Hari is now only an electronic image and nothing more. File this one under "L" for "Last but not least" because this type is everywhere by the dozen. You probably are aware of half-a-dozen yourself without understanding who and what they are. As with all else in life, if they seem too good to be true, they probably are.
None of those kinds of people, by the way, some now claiming some authorship of this group's activities (pretending to be conservatives), had anything to do with its achievements, including this:
You can see the Troll operations very clearly if you understand all this. Go to Twitter, read around and check the posting styles and content against your print-out of this article. You will see these patterns fall into place instantly. When you see someone like that, don't engage them. If you do it is an easy matter for them to whine to twitter to suspend your account and Twitter has better things to do than play nursemaid to a bunch of victims of trolls. If these people attack you, wear it as a badge of honor. Indeed, you might almost want to earn their disdain because it means you are an effective fighter for the conservative cause and getting real things done, not living in a bubble "praying" for help from trolls saying, "Love ya darlin'". If worse comes to worse, just block them.
SUGGESTED ACTIONS:
DO
1. DO boycott FOX. IMO No conservative believes they are right-wing enough. You won't destroy them completely, you will just inspire them to turn right.
2. DO Tweet media and Congressmen and tell them you want more Benghazi coverage and a select committee on Benghazi. And most of all, you want the Benghazi witnesses freed!
3. DO follow this blog and follow @Kathy_Amidon (that is not me) to stay involved in these actions.
4. Do call out the above-described trolls and ask, WHY AREN'T YOU TWEETING THE CONGRESS? Why aren't you boycotting FOX news instead of defending the "Rino News Network". Make them explain it. In so doing, they will out themselves, even by their silence. This isn't rocket science.
DO NOT
1. DO NOT respond to their attacks directly.
2. DO NOT let them waste your time on distractions like personal fights on Facebook and Twitter - stay focused on Benghazi issues and not flame wars with trolls.
3. DO NOT SIT BACK AND DO NOTHING because of trolls or anything else. More than any activity, that is the worst, because if you do that, then the trolls win for Obama without even lifting a finger. If Obama's trolls are going to ruin America, at least get involved and make it difficult for them. The flip side is it looks like we have a 50/50 chance to win back a conservative America.
GET INVOLVED! TODAY! Or never complain about Obama to anyone again, because complaining alone won't get America on the right track again.
THIS BLOG, WWW.BENGHAZI-TRUTH.BLOGSPOT.COM IS THE ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS AS REPORTED IN ALL NATIONAL NEWS STORIES. Except no imitators - they do not have our blessing nor our agreement or authorization to represent themselves as such or any organizational part of this movement.
******************
Filed for Friday, April 5, 2013
ANSWERING FORBES MAGAZINE'S ATTACK AGAINST US.
THE TV RATINGS FOR MARCH are in and FOX is down officially between 26% - 33% for the month. So much for Newsweek's David Freedlander's pompous mathematical declaration that our FOX NEWS, TURN RIGHT boycott effect was "negligible" and that their analysis showed our 22% ratings drop estimation to be "inflated".
I wonder then if this is why writer for Forbes and IMO bloviating hack Thomas Basile wrote an absurd column in Forbes to which this is a response, because from "editorial writers" to cybersquatters buying up Tea Party Fire Ant domains, everyone suddenly wants a solid piece of our action, and if they can't get it, they will tell you the action is worthless - "Nothing to see here folks, move along. By the way, did I ever tell you about me?"
We've seen this apparent pattern before; in times past, whenever a group affiliated with the Tea Party, or simply its values, scores a win, people come out of the woodwork trying to catch a piece of the pie. In Basile's case, he is careful to inform the reader that "I was there in the beginning" (so were most of us; this isn't Okinawa, it happened in 2009), and then goes on to name drop and make much noise that fails to mention a single personal accomplishment or contribution on his part to the Tea Party success while following with a long and winding dissertation of what the Tea Party is, must be, its failings, its goals, its best political structure and ultimately concluding that it is so damaged because of people like us and not him that it cannot possibly be a legitimate political or social force. This helium-rich screedsmithery is all directed as an attack against crazy, disconnected, loud but ineffective little us. Except, of course, and he fails to mention, that our "fringe group", the Tea Party Fire Ants, organized a boycott of the biggest News Network in the world and did the unimaginable: took the ratings down an official and proven 26% - 33%. Basile attacks the Fire Ants as lunatics but fails to mention this single, stunning Tea Party leadership victory his own contributions clearly fail to match, while complaining bitterly that we got much media attention, for which he feels we are not deserving, lest we ruin the "brand" - in his opinion, which he states as fact.
Unsurprisingly, unlike Newsweek which had the good graces to link to this site so people could read what we are about in our own words for themselves, Bastile describes what we are doing. Since he did not link to us, I won't link to him. Here are a couple of screenshots to give you an idea of Bastile's low opinion of the Tea Party and apparent very high opinion of his own opinion (click to enlarge and read).
In the beginning, Basile makes an astonishing implication; that he apparently feels that there has been plenty enough coverage on Benghazi from FOX. What?! The MSN video on the Fire Ant FOX boycott was certain to point out that FOX had twice as much coverage as other news sites. The problem with that is the other news venues are barely covering Benghazi at all. News flash to Basile: double of 1% is still only 2% and 2% isn't enough. Learn it. The thinking of people you claim to not understand will come into focus a lot faster. Rely on it.
Basile also talks in a way that suggests the liberal view very strongly: he suggests "of all things" that FOX is well right-wing enough, thanks. He proceeds to fail to mention that in 2011 Roger Ailes, CEO of FOX NEWS, held a press conference and announced he was taking FOX to the left. Not theory. He said it. He did it. Perhaps during this time Basile was in a self-induced coma from reading his own meaningless editorials.
During his essay on why he is right and people with whom he disagrees are wrong, which he bases on apparent theory with no tangibles as illustrations to make his wildly presumptive and ill-informed points of opinion, he creates a truly disassociated series of diametrically opposed Rube Goldberg suppositions which results in an utter, logistical train wreck in his world-view of the Tea Party: he states that the Tea Party is about freedom and less government, but emphasizes that the Tea party is never about social and political issues. What?!?! Well, okay, if the Tea Party is not about issues, then how do your define how freedom is understood and lack of freedom to which you supposedly stand against is manifest? Let's face it, as conservatives, if we had a strongly centralized government that policed itself to stay out of our lives, didn't tax us to death, used its central power to police the boarders, protect this nation from terrorists, behaved like it gave the benefit of the doubt to the unborn in matters of the mother's convenience, outlawed legislation such as Obamacare, the Tea Party never would have come into being and we would not quite be so hating our centralized government. The Tea Party has only ever been about issues, springing initially from taxation and ObamaCare, but who has not seen Tea Party rallies in which people held up signs of a myriad of social and political issues? The Tea Party is not about talking taxes and hope the media will be nice to us, it's about turning this country toward a solid conservative direction and to hell with the media because we'll work around it.
Last but not least Basile IMO commits the worst socio-political sin I can imagine for a so-called conservative (he's no conservative in my book, but you got that part in the first paragraph): Basile lives in apparent anxious fear of the media that hates us and will only be placated when we stop being conservative and become liberal. He is terrified of "crazy people" "ruing the brand". Once again, this smacks of Basile being a guy who believes that a central authority should be governing the Tea Party and clearly he believes that person should be himself, since he seems to think he has all the answers with no activist accomplishment to back them up. Reality check: There is no point in keeping the strongest among our number off the playing field for fear of media mockery because left media can never be placated. It will never tolerate with good will anything but total agreement and obedience. It can never be made a conservative ally. It will never compromise. It will never, with good manner and intent, seek the middle ground. It will never treat GOP and democrat candidates equally. We have seen it over and over and over again. I need not tell you, but someone should tell Basile, because he seems lost in some intellectual nether world between light and shadow. The left wing media hates us. Those who do not hate us outwardly have an unsavory, unctuous contempt that simply drips from their poison pen words which they read with furrowed brows off teleprompters, written by gray-haired pony tailed activists who still remember with sentimental reverence a fist in the air and the mantra, "power to the people" when it meant them and not us. I work in the media and I assure you that they speak most truly when what they say of conservatives drips the elitist venom of intolerance toward all people who do not vote, act, think, dress, speak and live as they feel all good people should, using themselves as the barometer which with they passionately come to their lofty condescension. How else do you think the term "flyover country" was born? - a term meaning you are of no value if you do not live in NYC or LA; it was not invented by nice people who cared about all of humanity. It was created by liberals who report the news as they see the world and to hell with anyone else's view of the world.
There is one thing with which all Tea Party people of all issue colors and creeds can agree: Anyone like Basile who thinks that FOX NEWS still represents conservatives (they lost 50% of their audience since Ailes turned the network left), says the Tea Party is ruined beyond repair and should be about freedom seemingly only in the intellectual abstract and not in a manner which describes the word with real-life examples, is in no way, shape or form any Tea Party activist of which I - or likely you - have ever been aware.
I suggest Basile get out of the hobby of writing about the Tea Party about which he clearly knows almost nothing whatsoever. If he continues and anyone listens to him, he may just "ruin the brand." Or perhaps that's his intention.
In the meantime, I repeat: the March ratings are in and FOX NEWS is down 26% - 33% from its previous norm. The fact that it happened the month of the first Tea Party Fire Ants FOX NEWS boycott was no more a coincidence than FOX losing 50% of its audience after Ailes turned the network left.
The Tea Party is not ruined. In fact, as of the ratings report, it can be conclusively reported that the Tea Party is roaring back to life, full of vigor, strength, determination and a collective mind full of new ideas ans strategies which are certain to win this nation back. Live it! We're back, and this time we're taking it all the way.
This is the official logo of the Tea Party Fire Ants, a tiny, crazy group of lunatics who in our collective ineptitude took on the biggest news network in the world and with little more than a snap of the fingers smashed and collapsed its ratings down 26% - 33%, an accomplishment never seen in the United States before, making headlines in the biggest news agencies all over America and beyond. Oh yeah, those Tea Party Fire Ants. Join us/them. The best way is to follow Twitter team leader @Kathy_Amidon. Do it now.
***********************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday, April 1, 2013
THE ON-GOING FOX NEWS BOYCOTT STARTS TODAY.
The success of this effort depends on you doing two things:
1st: TURN FOX OFF ON YOUR TV. This does not mean you need to suffer withdraw entirely if you are so disposed, as most major portions of the shows can be seen on FOXNEWS.COM. This will, at least at present, not effect their TV ratings, though Neilson is working to change that (the hang-up is that robot hit numbers can be bought, and that needs to be filtered out of the counting system somehow if they start to include internet views - a seemingly impossible proposition).
Here is a list of solid, alternative sources:
Print:
Foxnews.com
The blaze.com
human events.com
worldnetdaily.com
nationalreview.com
Video:
Foxnews.com
Youtube (search for any news subject with the filter "last 24 hours" - you get everything you need from that alone)
msn.com (they were surprisingly fair to us in their video coverage)
Most internet news sites carry videos
IN JULY "ONE AMERICA" news network premiers, teamed with the Washington Times. We'll have extended coverage on that, soon. Here's an announcement:
Announcement at CPAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED7bRU8Xn3w
2. YOU need to speak out on Twitter with the group, The Tea Party Fire Ants, now covered by most major media (see the memos, below) . Follow @FrankMDavisJR & @Kathy_Amidon (the central organizer) and join the TPFA as we swarm thread after thread of GOP Reps who could break Benghazi and Fox News hosts who, IMO, need to be shaken awake in their ivory tower and made to realize that the world is changing outside their windows, and if they don't change with the world, the world has no obligation to carry them.
This isn't entertainment to fascinate and amuse the readers - this is serious business. You can use your own name or an alias on Twitter (many do use aliases). STOP everything else and think about this: There are scant few ways Obama can be stopped, but public awareness is still a way. But pontificating at each other on web sites has not worked. It will not work. YOU need to work in and with a group that contacts congressmen and media alike. Let the media and congress know you are unhappy with their service and do so in a way that they know the rest of the world sees it - and the only way to do that uncensored is on Twitter. So follow @FrankMDavisJR & @Kathy_Amidon on Twitter ASAP, watch, see what's going on and add your voice to congress and media as quickly as humanly possible. The conservative right can still win this fight for the heart and soul of America - the stars have aligned - but YOU NEED TO GET INVOLVED.
********************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Saturday, March 30, 2013
Out of respect during the weekend of this Holy Christian Holiday, celebrating the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, we're leaving the knock-down, drag-out political fighting until Monday.
However, since it was just posted, I'd like to share this new media coverage with you of the Tea Party Fire Ants' Fox News boycotts. The story is starting to pop up on local stations all over the country, but to my knowledge this is the first national - albeit internet - TV coverage of the movement (this does not include the non-video news sources which has covered it, starting with Newsweek and spreading quickly throughout the media). Take a look:
We'll see you Monday, when we plan to have a lot of exciting news about the next - and potentially permanent - boycott of Fox News. Don't miss it.
HAPPY EASTER, EVERYONE
**********************
**********************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Thursday, March 28, 2013
Here is how Wonderland looks today in a nutshell: If FOX NEWS is engaging in some kind of grudge match against it's own core audience, it's pretty clear it cannot win this game. Here's why:
1. Competition is around the corner in the form of the new conservative news network, One America. Liberals will say that this is not a game changer but of course it is; when any company has a monopoly on an audience demographic and a challenger comes in to undercut them by going more aggressively for that demographic - in this case actively soliciting known Tea party personalities for hosts and striving to reach libertarians - the company with the former monopoly is in a decided disadvantage because it is forced to react to the challenger, not knowing the exact battle plan of the challenger in advance and how that will play out. IMO FOX is finished if it waits to respond and does not turn hard right now. There's just no money to be made in the center - It's like concocting a treat that is neither sweet nor sour and nobody likes to eat cardboard. Certainly the left will never trust FOX to represent them. If FOX allows it's core audience to migrate, IMO they are done in 2 years because the audience will never go back - they never do.
2. Despite the brave face FOX is putting on by ignoring all references to the boycotts, they simply look cowardly by not addressing the fact in one way or the other. The problem is, insulting their own audience has not worked well for them: they have lost 50% of their viewers in 2 years, and lose handily to the left competition when you roll the competition's numbers together. So this leaves the embarrassment of capitulation or what was once called, "Apologizing to an unhappy audience and promising a better show the next time." (Such an idea is anathema to liberal elites, of course, who feel that if they have the power to influence an audience, the audience has a duty to shut up and allow themselves to be influenced without objection)
3. Obama's scandals are breaking, well, to use a phrase, fast and furious. Now it appears that gun-running was indeed going on in Benghazi and if that is true, then the worst feared on this page months ago may be proving correct: Obama wanted those people killed to eliminate the witnesses. That might sound a tad melodramatic were the witnesses not being hidden, their identities deliberately being kept secret from congress, as congress has complained. Remember, Obama has never offered an explanation for why they are being hidden, and is relying on his friends in the media to keep such questions from reaching him. His media pals though seem to be getting antsy - I see it in their faces and hear it in their voices in-person - Obama let liberals die in Benghazi, and murdered Ambassador Stevens is rumored to have been gay, as well. This is changing a lot of opinions by former Obama believers because now instead of a savior Obama is looking to them what he has seemed to us for a long time: an arrogant, pathological street thug.
4. We're seeing more numbers of people supporting the FOX boycotts since all the publicity with a generally very high degree of enthusiasm. For years the Tea Party, "Far-right", has been lectured endlessly that they are wrong, not sane and have no power. Well, they find their views make sense to many others - many more people who read NEWSWEEK and the rest - and are overjoyed, determined, and sometimes giddy to know that they have power and the stars have aligned with scandal, a new network and grassroots activism to put that power into play and make the kind of media difference that can change a country big enough to change the world.
The next Boycott, number 3, will be continuous with no cut-off date. If FOX wants to go down in flames by turning its back on the people who made them successful, that's their business and they can spite that audience to the last dime in their own - FOX's - bank account.
There is clearly no place for conservatives in Aile's and Murdoch's new FOX NEWS, so the smart money is jumping ship now. FOX would do well to heed common sense and return to those who made FOX successful, because the pieces on the chess board are not well-configured for FOX. If they cannot reverse course and deliver the goods to their core audience before One America hits the cable skeds, it's certainly and obviously only a short length of time before it's checkmate - with FOX setting the King on its side. IMO FOX is too expensive an operation now to weather the hit they are about to take from this alignment of the stars.
"My!" said Alice!
*********************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Tuesday, March 26, 2013
EDIT: 2ND BOYCOTT RATINGS RESULTS HAVE BEEN ADDED, BELOW.
Click for the larger, more easily seen image
WELL, UNSURPRISINGLY, it is up to those of us on the right to correct the leftist media - again. This time in reporting the TEA PARTY FOX NEWS BOYCOTT (looks like FOX is down a consistent 22% during boycotts from the numbers before the first boycott. That means while many have walked away for good, when a boycott happens, they bottom out at 22% - and more)
1. MOST MEDIA, taking their cue from far-left NEWSWEEK/DAILY BEAST, report our initial boycott ratings report of a 22% ratings loss for FOX is either incorrect or not yet confirmed. Both are untrue. Scroll down and see the ratings links, the screenshots and avail yourself of the linked online percentage calculator - none of which the media reported - and you can prove the 22% for yourself. Funny how they kind-of missed all that - it's been up for a couple of weeks.
EDIT: THE WEEKEND NUMBERS ARE IN and it appears that when you count the overall drop since the first boycott, the 2nd boycott again hit around a 22% drop in FOX numbers. Since the left media did not bother to report how people can prove it to themselves and simply expect the world to take their word for it, I'll play the same game: the 2nd boycott dropped FOX 22%. Take my word for it. The online percentage calculator, etc, are still linked, below, if anyone wants to do the math.
We have asked David Freedlander of NEWSWEEK, who wrote the first media story, how he arrived at the fact that our numbers were wrong - he never explained it in the article. Well, IMO he's "hiding under his desk" - IMO his reporting the NEWSWEEK/DAILY BEAST conclusion was a lie to diminish the credibility of the boycott. You will see a lot of mockery of the boycott by the same media that has for years demanded the nation stop watching FOX. The reason is that the one thing they don't want conservatives to know is that conservatives have the power to steer a news organization into exposing Obama on Benghazi and every other scandal he has amassed.
2. The Daily News and others have claimed to not be able to reach me for comment even though they posted my Twitter handle. Do know that I have received a query tweet from only one news outfit, a place in London, and that's it. It's clear the Daily News wanted to make it appear that I was afraid to speak. They should read this blog more often or follow me on Twitter - they know the handle.
3. They say FOX has not turned left. This is 100% factually incorrect if one is to think Roger Ailes has been successful in steering FOX, because he announced it to the press long ago that this is exactly what he was going to do, and he did it, and conservatives see the difference with no help from liberals:
OUR NEXT BOYCOTT will be ongoing and permanent. Giving FOX two shots across the bow to turn back and away from the "course correct" set by Ailes seems to be enough fair play in our estimation. We will provide you with links to places and outfits to replace FOX, as well as ways to watch FOX online after a show is broadcast so as to not encourage their ratings numbers, and how to get One America where you live when that new network debuts.
We know liberals are trying to artificially inflate the numbers - they have said so online, and have done so with some success - but sooner or later those liberal activists will get bored - or move to attack One America when it premiers - and FOX, IMO, will be left as a smoldering heap of good memories gone bad when they essentially betrayed the faith of the right-wing audience that made it successful. If the right is going to take back America by the fast-approaching 2014 midterms, this move is an absolute strategic necessity. Trust me, you won't miss yelling "No" at your TV when you stop watching the new left-leaning FOX for an extended period - or forever.
We know liberals are trying to artificially inflate the numbers - they have said so online, and have done so with some success - but sooner or later those liberal activists will get bored - or move to attack One America when it premiers - and FOX, IMO, will be left as a smoldering heap of good memories gone bad when they essentially betrayed the faith of the right-wing audience that made it successful. If the right is going to take back America by the fast-approaching 2014 midterms, this move is an absolute strategic necessity. Trust me, you won't miss yelling "No" at your TV when you stop watching the new left-leaning FOX for an extended period - or forever.
***********************
Filed for Monday, March 25, 2013
While we're waiting for the FOX NEWS boycott ratings to come in, since Newsweek, Salon and the like are sending many thousands of opinionated liberal readers here every day, we'd like to address a few of the concerns in your comments, here (Yes, I delete most of them: the 1st Amendment isn't defined as "liberals censor conservatives but conservatives don't censor liberals").
On the issue of why this blog has concluded that Obama must have wanted the people in Benghazi dead, it's pretty simple: with so many options to save them provided by the most well-funded government in the entire world, from pulling them out, like the UK did their people, to fortifying them with protection by order at the US Benghazi Annex, the only way those people could be dead is if either Obama wanted them dead or is so pathological he simply did not care. Hillary and Panetta's testimony make it absolutely undeniable that Obama knew what was going on at the time of the attack, and at the very least made himself unavailable to sign certain orders that only he could to save them (retired military "Sergeant Major" has a guest column detailing the specifics, if you scroll down - look for the word "Memo" in green for guest editorials, here). Obama also lied about the cause of the attack, initially (the supposed "riot-creating anti-Muslim video", which it turns out had nothing to do with the terrorist attack, a talking point Obama merely dutifully parroted from Libya propaganda mere hours after the attack. The video artist who created the blamed video continues to languish in prison, so that shows what Obama thinks of artists).
It is clear also that Obama and Clinton ignored cables from Stevens practically begging for help. Admit it, liberal ideologues: if this had happened under George Bush you would all be screaming your heads off by now. But remember this, too: Stevens was a liberal who was apparently enamored of Obama, just like you are - and at the very least, Obama locked him up in a country with no way out, turned his back and let him die. Some sobering food for thought for all you Obama-worshiping cretins out there who think that a street punk from Chicago is going to save the world - or give a damn about you when your time comes.
On the issue of this writer being a "birther", that definition tops out for me at believing Obama's birth certificate is a fake, of which I am certain. Joseph Newcomer, whose analysis of the Bush National Guard Forgeries as forgeries got Dan Rather fired from CBS News, says it's a fake ("There are artifacts in the birth certificate document that are strongly suggestive of a forgery. The document screams out that something is wrong." ). Tampa-based E-Comp Consultants, which supplies courtroom testimony in cases of document fraud to a long list of Fortune 500 clients says its a fake. Gary Poyssik who helped to create Photoshop for Adobe says it's a fake. Sheriff Joe Arpaio who has 30 years fed law experience, 20 additional law enforcement experience years being re-elected by his 5 million constituents and has 1,000 volunteer investigators and tens of thousands of law enforcement on the payroll under his command had the document analyzed for six months and concluded the birth certificate is a pathetic fake, as has lifelong democrat Mara Zebest, a technical editor on over 100 books on computer graphic manipulation. And 1,000 of other graphics experts who took one look at that piece of digital trash and didn't know whether top be shocked or laugh out loud.
I can tell you how to see evidence yourself right now. Open the originally posted document from the White House (I heard they replaced the one with the infamous layers democrats were defending, but I have not checked any updates). Open layers > Layer 28 > histories and you will see a little box which reads, among other things, "Scale" and "rotate". You are looking at the Adobe command log automatically generated when a layer is manipulated, a critical piece of reference for professionals. That is why on the main Illustrator and Photoshop toolbar you can go to Edit > Purge > histories clipboard/all. That function is to erase the log you just opened - and the cretin who made the forgery was not skilled enough to even do that.
And who defends the birth certificate? A mocking press and online ideological trolls with not one shred of analyses of the same document to back up their defense.
It's becoming clear that Obama cannot possibly sustain this degree of scandal. Sometime soon the democrats are going to start to throw him under the bus to save themselves, as many Republicans did to Nixon, and when that moment comes, don't be surprised if I write four simple words:
"I told you so."
**********************
On related news, NEWSWEEK's article on the Tea Party boycott - and this blog - is being picked up everywhere (Salon, PoliticsUSA, Daily Paul, Rawstory, Before It's News, Daily Kos and other left/extremist sites, just do a Google search), so we repeat to NEWSWEEK writer David Freedlander (Twitter @freedlander )to either revise his statement or prove his assertion correct:
If you scroll down to March 11 in the Memos on this board, you will see the screenshots of the ratings, links to them, and an online percentage calculator where you can figure the percentages for yourself. We see a clear drop on the March 8-10 boycott of the FOX ratings of 22%. So will you.
Benghazi-Truth never publishes as fact anything it can't prove. Freedlander seemingly just relies on his supposed credibility to demean the efforts of the boycott, lest the Tea Party discover it has real power, again. (Just the one Twitter group, @WashingtonDCTea has almost 500,000 followers alone, almost fully a third of NEWSWEEK's reported world-wide print circulation, and there are hundreds of Tea Party groups totaling many millions. Tea Party no longer means "Taxed Enough Already anymore, but is a collective term for people who are so sick of leftist government they will do something about it)
Thanks again to NEWSWEEK for advertising, albeit with clear ill intent, this mission and even this blog. Have a great Sunday, everyone!
**************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Saturday, March 23, 2013
UPDATE ON THE TEA PARTY FOX NEWS "TURN RIGHT" BOYCOTT.
"Curiouser and curiouser", cried Alice. Indeed, the landscape of this event has become as strange as Wonderland, and while the people in the Tea Party boycotting are no Mad Hatters to be sure, just about everyone else injecting themselves into the boycott, in my opinion, seem to be.
Firstly, the ratings numbers. Despite the much shorter lead/advertising time, at first I was quite disappointed to see what seemed to be only an 8% drop in the ratings on Thursday, the 1st night. A number that slight is difficult to average out because ratings fluctuate within the the margin of error, but 8% seems about right. Then looking over the numbers, we see that FOX is continually lower now than it had been before the first boycott. What has and is happening seems clear; of the 22% that walked away during the 1st boycott, it seems 10% - 12% never went back. That means the current 2nd boycott thus far is doing almost as well as the 1st one, except that the balance of the numbers past the 8% never stopped boycotting - they just went. Curiouser and Curiouser. We'll see how the weekend shapes up; the numbers should be out by Monday or Tuesday at the latest.
Early yesterday I got communication from Kathy Amidon that someone claiming to be from Newsweek Magazine/the Daily Beast (they have merged) contacted her for an interview. Yes, we're talking about this Newsweek:
Well, it turns out that was apparently true, the person was/is from Newsweek and the person's name is David Freedlander (try to refrain from saying "Freeloader", like I just didn't), and as I get the story from several people, in their opinions he was aggressive, contacting Kathy via phone and DM on Twitter several times requesting a phone interview she did not want to give. Interestingly I heard nothing from the guy, and I suspect he simply did not want to give the name of a contributor which would lead people to this blog. Makes no sense, otherwise, since he was clearly aware of all the players (Edit: Freedlander did link to this blog, the numbers of which are a up a bit today. Thanks for the free advertising, Dave! Hopefully a few of your liberal knot-head readers will get with the program).
Wisely, Kathy had no interest in feeding the left-wing Tea Party destruction machine - I am unaware of any favorable reporting of or editorials about the Tea Party by Newsweek and the cover, above, speaks to their opinion of conservatives - so Kathy kept telling Freedlander at most she would do a written interview, not a telephone interview. But apparently he insisted on a telephone interview, and IMO in so doing hid from a process that would have produced a written record of what Kathy actually would have told him. Eventually he told her, according to Kathy, "This is your chance to be heard." Now considering that she was in the forefront of organizing approximately 700,000 Tea Party members to successfully Boycott the first time, and Newsweek has a mostly left-wing audience of just about only double that, it's hard to see how any Conservative would care less about being "heard" in Newsweek's, in my opinion, trashy, hate-filled pages. Here are a few screenshots from twitter to illustrate:
.... He never did ask us anything on Twitter. IMO unimaginative at least - would have made for a big, engaging tech/human-interest story for a faded giant. Maybe David just didn't want to find himself in a venue where he did not have 100% control of the message. Anyway, we feel he had his chance to be heard. Anyone can talk as they please, but for our part here, we're no longer interested in speaking with Newsweek, telephone, written or smoke signals. Edit: Freelander says our boycott calculations are not correct. I guess we're supposed to take his word on that. If you scroll down a bit to March 11, we give you links/screenshots to the ratings and an online percentage calculator, and you can calculate the number dip for yourselves. I challenge David to prove his manifestly inaccurate statement by describing the process by which he claims to have disproved the fact that the 1st boycott March 8 -10 brought FOX down by 22%. When uber-left outfit Newsweek defends FOX NEWS numbers against the Tea Party, that should tell all conservatives that FOX really has moved to the wrong side of the fence for conservatives.
So instead of finding the Benghazi Witnesses, a liberal Newsweek bigwig chases us around wondering why the Tea Party is boycotting FOX NEWS, and defending FOX from the Tea Party. Curiouser and Curiouser.
In related developments, media is now starting to laud FOX's Bill O'Reilly's ratings, even though they are half of what they were two years ago. IMO this is due entirely to their displaying approval of FOX now that it has gone left, essentially abandoning FOX's core audience that made then wealthy, an act of unconscionable, cold-blooded betrayal. Curiouser and Curiouser.
Lastly, people who are, IMO, hard-core, insulting leftist activists on Twitter (I have spoken of them before), Dakota R and friends, are now apparently saying truly absurd things about this boycott, going so far as to say that the Tea Party is not conservative! This is, of course, clearly a hyperbolic and desperate attempt too keep FOX politically left where it is not a threat to Obama and their agenda. They appear to be more successful than last time at artificially inflating FOX's numbers during the boycott to counter the boycott (they failed utterly the first time) Curiouser and Curiouser. But this is a long battle and we have just begun to fight. We have no doubt that before long we will rally over 1 million people to boycott FOX until it TURNS RIGHT, or until the One America network arrives in July and everyone just walks away from the smoldering ash-heap that was once "Fair and Balanced".
MESSAGE: FOX TURN RIGHT
OBJECTIVE: To restore the same scrutiny to the Office of the President by the media that was enjoyed by presidents past like Richard Nixon, and presumably with the same results.
**************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Thursday, March 21, 2013
Today marks the first day of the 2nd TEA PARTY FOX NEWS BOYCOTT. Last night alone FOX earned this boycott, IMO, by ignoring Benghazi all day and then after 10:00 PM, when prime-time viewer numbers are lowest, gave about 2 minutes to Benghazi around 10:30 PM, and offered no new information at all, just a complaining session between Greta Van Susteren and Senator Lindsey Graham about how Obama was being uncooperative. Did Walter Cronkite mention Watergate only on the 11:00 news once a week and then only for 15 seconds?
As an illustration of how truly pathetic FOX has been on Benghazi for a supposed right-wing channel (they went left as you know, but that's a different story), while van Susteren flew from the FOX DC office to Aruba to chase the corpse of one murdered girl among millions - pure tabloid garbage - and flew up to Alaska repeatedly to report on Palin - pure celebrity reporting - according to Mapquest, Van Susteren is only a 31 minute drive from the FOX DC studio at 400 N. Capitol Street in DC where she works to Walter Reed Hospital 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, Maryland, where at least one survivor is reported to still be recovering - after 6 months!
If Van Susteren needs us to paint her a picture, here's one from Mapquest: directions to get from FOX studios in DC to the Hospital. After 6 months she might at least get her ass into an car with a cameraman and give the audience a look at the place, for God's sake.
Directions, part 1(click for larger size)
Directions, part 2
It's obvious that just as it is becoming clear that the people who died in Benghazi are only dead because Obama must have wanted them dead, so it is clear IMO that FOX is not investigating Benghazi because they just don't give a damn enough to walk out the door and do it.
There are almost double the number of people pledged to boycott FOX this second time from the info we are getting, which puts the number at about 1.4 million, or 50% of FOX's contemporary best prime time audience number. Make this boycott bigger than the last one.
Just walk away from FOX until they do what we want them to do. God knows, after Ailes turned his company left - officially with an announcement - to make an extra buck, they certainly walked away from us while at the same time telling us that no one else but FOX will love us.
IMO Lazy, Manipulative, cold-blooded, Unconscionable.
BOYCOTT!
********************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Tuesday, March 19, 2013
The second TEA PARTY FOX NEWS BOYCOTT starts in 2 days (details in previous memo, below). Some comparisons to drive the point, although if you are conservative, you don't need to be told:
Imagine Walter Cronkite: "We'd love to Investigate Watergate but only if you send us the name of a burgler".
Imagine Walter Cronkite: (six months after Watergate) "So far all we know is that there were some people who broke into the Watergate offices. The President has not released the names of any witnesses who might have seen what was going on so there isn't anything else we can do or tell you. Now on to our top story, a cruise ship lost the use of its bathrooms. This terrible tragedy happened...."
Imagine Walter Cronkite: "I get many letters from angry people who are way, way out there. Angry, crazy people saying Nixon is hiding secret Tapes!"
Imagine Walter Cronkite: "Nixon is a bad president but didn't do anything impeachable. You leftists are scary!"
Imagine Walter Cronkite: "Our team at CBS has listened to the tapes and can confirm that there are no missing segments and that President Richard Nixon is the president and has committed no impeachable offenses."
Imagine Walter Cronkite: "Missing Watergate tapes? That's crazy! He's the President, get over it! Crazy "Tapers"!
A comparison for anyone who needs it. How a real journalist did it...
...and, IMO, how a rank amateur acts like a childish, prancing fool, seemingly afraid of his own shadow in never-never land.
TEA PARTY BOYCOTT MESSAGE
TO FOX: TURN RIGHT.
*****************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday, March 18
The date(s) for the 2nd TEA PARTY FOX NEWS BOYCOTT has been announced:
6 AM Thursday, March 21, 2013 -
6 AM Sunday, March 24, 2013
The For those very few who have not awakened to the fact that FOX has deliberately abandoned its core conservative base, as always, I give you the proof of the facts and never ask you to simply take my word on it (that's how these things are supposed to be done); read it from Roger Ailes himself, as reported on The Week in Sept, 2011
http://theweek.com/article/index/219674/fox-news-revealing-course-correction-6-talking-points
Reported only a few weeks, also at "The Week" is how we conservatives are shutting Fox off and down
http://theweek.com/article/index/224422/is-fox-news-shifting-to-the-left
Ailes more than made good on his promise: his hosts yell and pontificate against Obama while not covering a single story that truly damages Obama. CBS News was all over Watergate 24/7, and a couple of decades later the Bush National Guard documents, the fact of the forgeries of which cost Dan Rather his job with that network. Yet, IMO, Fox News has turned into the TV equivalent of PAGE 6 at Murdoch's own New York Post.
On related news, as predicted here recently, THERE IS A COMPETING CONSERVATIVE NEWS NETWORK COMING JULY 1ST, 2013, as reported by Pam Geller/Atlas Shrugs via The Wall Street Journal (although the news is spreading fast). It was a no-brainer to anticipate that some outfit with the bucks would swoop in to fill the void left by FOX to make a fortune catering to the most undeserved and underrated audience in America: the true conservatives.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/03/new-conservative-news-network-to-be-launched.html
As a consequence of all this, after knocking FOX down another 22% for the two days during the last boycott (9 days ago as of this writing), it seems that TEA PARTY/CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVES have a tremendous amount of power we have never had before and may not see again: FOX is unbelievably vulnerable to the anger of their audience and thus the audience is in a real position to demand what they want to see and have FOX feel obligated to respond. Quite frankly, it is my own opinion that with the Tea Party Fire Ants swarming GOP/FOX tweets very day, now almost all-day, demanding those people and places turn right, the effect of the boycotts which will continue and the threat of a new conservative network competitor on the the horizon, I don't see how FOX NEWS continues it's leftist posture and stays in business.
Therefore, in the spirit of a free marketplace, I suggest everyone who reads this post make the following demands on FOX and back it up by spreading the word of the boycott:
1. We want FOX to become an active, investigative news organization serving the needs and wants of the "far right" audience. We want FOX to be the right-wing CBS News: to break stories, to break information, and to do what news organizations have always done with such stories: break politicians.
2. We want FOX to have at least one segment on Benghazi every night on at least two of the three shows in prime time. Yes, that means work. It means dropping the tabloid bullshit and acting like a mature, serious, determoned news organization for a change. Sorry, if you want us to support you after stabbing your core audience in the back, you're going to have to earn it or, quite frankly, IMO, you can go to hell. For my own part, I hope I made that clear.
3. Yes, the BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Obama's birth certificate. You know, that thing you mocked and the people you mocked who turned out to be right when they said it was a fake? If you want our business you can cut the playing dumb bullshit and report what half the country suspects and about ten percent knows: Obama's birth certificate is a fake. We want you to report it every night, interview experts, ask why and investigate how and why this happened. CBS would if Obama was a conservative president. We're tired of being ignored, taken for granted and mocked. The "birthers' were right and unless you want to be fighting MSNBC for an audience in the bottom of the toilet while your viewers migrate to One America on July 1, you'll do it.
4. We're not interested in "Fair and Balanced". Is MSNBC fair and balanced? Is even CNN or the major networks? Most people say no - even the people who rely on them singularly for their daily news sources - so all anyone sees in your balance is ceding 50% of the ground conservatives want someone to fight for by some misplaced sense of moral superiority on your part. If you want to speak for liberals you can join them and be a tiny voice as you fight for their tiny numbers in a of diffuse world of a million clones in left-wing entertainment. If you want to singularly win back at least part the other half of the country, you better start showing them what they want to see.
O'Reilly, Van Susteren and Smith also owe the "birthers" an on-screen and sincere apology and that's no joke.
BOYCOTT TO GET WHAT YOU WANT.
IT'S AN AMERICAN TRADITION!
**********************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Sat, March 16
TEA PARTY "FOX NEWS, TURN RIGHT" BOYCOTT FOLLOW-UP
If you followed the boycott and the results, (posted immediately below this Memo) go here or look at he screenshots, below,and check the ratings from march 11 onward:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/03/14/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-march-13-2013/173334/
March 11
You can see that FOX ratings are back up from the boycott but consistently a little lower. This proves the 22% loss was due to the boycott (which was incredibly easy to organize and make happen). However, I have not run the percentages (yet) but at first glance looks like out of the 22% who boycotted, about 5% - 8% of the FOX audience total never went back. Of all the statistics, this must be the most alarming for FOX, because as predicted, when some people find out how easy it is to kick and bad habit, they don't go back, and until FOX NEWS turns it's reporting bias back to the hard right where conservatives believe it belongs, FOX NEWS qualifies as a bad habit.
In related news, FOX NEWS seems to be scrambling a bit to make it appear as though they have Benghazi on the mind. We all agree that this is due to our group efforts every night of the week on Twitter for months, an the boycott, particularly. Many people who watch our large group from the outside are now congratulation our group on that account. Not to boast for boastings' sake, but people need to know that they have their own voice which when combined with others can move mountains, and do so unbelievably easy. And yes, we are doing more boycotts and soon, so check here every day for the next announcement, which will be a three day boycott instead of two and we anticipate if everyone sticks to their guns, we can drop them by more than 30%. If we do that, we might even see FOX suddenly awaken as if from a deep sleep and cover the story of Obama's fake birth certificate and give that the coverage it deserves, also.
In a last note, we are becoming more organized on Twitter and as such have branded the group, so people know we are not just a loose, associated group who will get bored and fall apart, but a tight and growing group under a branded banner which speaks to our resolve and purpose. The TEA PARTY FIRE ANTS; determined relentless and unstoppable when combined together as a force. That's our group; we live it and have proved it. Follow the activity on twitter and join in by following @Kathy_Amidon or me, @FrankMDavisJR
If you are a new reader of this blog and have not seen the results of the boycott from March 8 and 9 to drive FOX NEWS back to the right, read the memo directly below.
****************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Mon, March 11 /
Tuesday, March 12 2013 / Continuing
Bumped back to the top by request
TEA PARTY "FOX NEWS, TURN RIGHT" BOYCOTT
GIANT SUCCESS
FOX NEWS RATINGS DOWN A STAGGERING 22% FOR BOTH DAYS.
PROOF BELOW
GIANT SUCCESS
FOX NEWS RATINGS DOWN A STAGGERING 22% FOR BOTH DAYS.
PROOF BELOW
Scroll down to the screenshots for the quick version.
In all reality, this should be a monumental accomplishment covered by all media. maybe the left snarks will chide FOX it, anyway. I'm confident FOX NEWS won't report it!
FOR MANY PEOPLE, MEDIA SILENCE AND TIMID GOP BUMBLING ON BENGHAZI IS THE LAST STRAW. The message loud and clear to FOX: "Stop screwing around and start serving your core audience, or your core audience will take their business elsewhere."
People should also know how boycotts work. Just as boycotting a store is more than a popularity contest, the teeth of the argument lies in the downward hit on the store's profits, boycotting a TV show effects what the network can charge from their advertisers for air time: the better the ratings, the higher the price for the time, hence the huge amounts paid to air on Super Bowl. Fox is already down 50% of it's audience in 2 years. Can they afford another 22%, 28%, 39%, 50%? Can they charge big rates if no one watches at all? We'll find out soon enough, I suspect, by how they respond.
By the way, as reported a week ago, this boycott had the support of Tea Party leaders around the country who represent more than 700,000 people. They delivered. The drop in FOX ratings numbers, on-average, hit that number just about exactly right. Let no one tell you it was anything but true conservatives who made this happen. Not only did it work, but we have a reliable operation, now, to do it as many times as we want, provided the Tea Party leaders support the boycotts again, which seems likely, since all conservatives are simply fed up with just about everything. We thank them for their support in this; In theory, whether FOX obeys its audience or not, this is stage one in turning this country back to the right.
You can check the validity of the screenshots at this very reliable reporting site of Neilson ratings numbers:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/category/cable-news/
As always, I give you the tools to prove the facts for yourself. Here is a free online percentage calculator, but you can use any and many are readily available. Just enter the rating number from any day on any show against the March 8 Boycott day numbers for the same show and you can calculate the percentage of the ratings drop. Always a drop, the boycott day never exceeds other day ratings.
http://www.percentagecalculator.net/
SCREENSHOT 1 shows Friday, March 8, 2013, the first day of the Boycott. You will note that the numbers in this screenshot are lower and sometimes considerably lower than any others. These screenshots were not cherry-picked for effect, but to give a reasonable sampling.
(Click each image for a larger version for easier reading)
Here is the day before, Thursday, March 7. While the numbers drop across the whole day, this sample shows the prime-time ratings, where viewer numbers are strongest. The difference between Friday's O'Reilly, Hannity and Greta (from this point onward, O, H & G) of 2,382,000, 1,633,000, 1,309,000 and Thursday's higher 3,087,000, 2,256,000, 1,747,000 is a drop on the Friday Boycott of 22%, 38% (!)and 25%, respectively.
Here is Wed, March 6. We see the difference between Wed and Friday - Friday's loss - is O = 28%, H = 29%, G = 23%. No, the pattern developing is not a trick of the eye, the drop on each night compared to Friday is more or less uniform except for Hannity's Benghazi special at 38%, which we singled out particularly for the boycott, because we're not interested in smoke and mirrors and shiny objects designed to fool the carnival suckers, we want the GD Benghazi witnesses to testify and we want them now; 6 months of Obama secrecy and game-playing is an intolerable outrage and FOX needs to do its part or prove itself irrelevant.(also, though, liberals would be less likely to watch something that upsets them like proof Obama was not a good POTUS during Benghazi, so I would split the difference between the 22% and the 38%)
Tuesday, same thing, more or less, O = 18% difference H = 24%, G = 17%
Monday, March 4, the same, O = 22%, H = 18%, G (a bad night for her regardless) = 9%
In the event that people say Fridays are different in the ratings, they can be, because it's date night, so shows/networks with a younger audience fluctuate wildly from week to week. Not so much for FOX because people tend to turn conservative from their stupid youth; FOX's audience skews older, and are less likely to be going out on Friday, especially with kids at home. But guess what? Comparing the previous Friday shows the day of the week makes no difference - the boycott still smacked 20% plus from the network.
O = 21%, H = 22%, G = 20%
Rewind to Tues, Feb 26. Same thing. O = 18%, H = 24%, G = 10% (another bad night for Greta generally)
You will see there is a pattern of uniformity, on-average, in the drop between all other nights and the Friday boycott ratings, averaging around a roughly 22% drop on the boycott day of Friday, March 8, 2013.
Something else to be noted is that while liberals and moderates also watch FOX, Hannity, who draws the largest proportion of conservative viewers, takes by far the biggest hit from the Friday boycott. This demonstrates, again, almost conclusively, that the ratings effect was generated by angry and dissatisfied conservatives walking away. Bear in mind, too, that liberals were trying to artificially inflate FOX's numbers to keep FOX from becoming a greater threat by moving right, and their efforts were simply clearly overwhelmed on a massive scale.
EDIT: The ratings for Saturday, March 9 are in and proves the success; the second day of the boycott, Saturday, also showed a 21% - 22% drop on average. To any reasonable mind, this proves it: the boycott was successful beyond anyone's wildest dreams and we can do it again and again and again until FOX gives this audience what it wants.
The week before the Boycott, prime-time
1,375,000.
A week later, On the second day of the Boycott: 1,088,000
A total loss on the 2nd day of the boycott of 287,000 viewers is a second day loss of 21%.
Do angry conservatives mean that mean Ailes was correct to steer the network to the left? No, because as the demographics show, FOX's audience relies heavily on older viewers, and proportionately the older viewers lean way to the right.
Additional points of interest: 1. Conservatives just made it clear that they won't hang around for FOX's hypocritical expressions of love, coddling them superficially while knocking their teeth out on substance. 2. We're going to keep boycotting, with longer day counts and with bigger numbers, until FOX meets our demands or conservatives realize they are happier without FOX and walk away.
Another thing FOX needs to bear in mind is that after every boycott, they are certain to lose a percentage of the audience that boycotted and lose them permanently; sampling from Facebook remarks and Tweets is that some felt a sense of relief not having to yell at a supposed friend every night for betraying them. As FOX allows this to continue by staying left their audience will shrink until, hypothetically, they are battling CNN and MSNBC for moderates and liberals, and sharing their same pathetic, sewer-drain numbers, because the conservatives will have gone, and they proportionately make up the lion's share share of news talk generally anyway, just as talk radio is buoyed by conservatives seeking expression in a pop culture world that demeans them.
IMO FOX was quite stupid to let it go this far. Their audience now knows it has the power to make or break them, and will use legal boycotts like this last one to attempt to draw concessions, and this time we want more than the Benghazi witnesses - we also want to see Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his experts explain why a law enforcement official with the third largest constituency in the United States - 5 million people - and 30 years federal experience and 20 years serving his 5 million people found Obama's birth certificate to be a fake (the biggest non-secret in DC); we want FOX to get active as investigative journalists making life tough for Obama the way all reporters are supposed to make life tough for politicians; complaining with patriotic fervor of things which sound good but do nothing to actually put Obama on defense is unacceptable and those days are over. As of Friday, those days are over.
For a boycott organized in a week on social media started by a handful of people from a Benghazi internet site, bolstered by the immediate support of Tea Party leaders around the country representing hundreds of thousands, to dunk FOX's ratings by an average of a full, mind-shattering 22% across their entire broadcast day shows FOX is incomprehensibly vulnerable to the manifestations of audience dissatisfaction. My advice to FOX would be to straight up and go way right fast - really fast - because when a situation has a security level this whisper-thin, control can be lost in a heartbeat.
We Boycott again soon. In the meantime tell everyone you know this boycott was amazingly successful and send them here to see and know the results with no question about the proof whatsoever.
MESSAGE FOR FOX: IMO your audience is now organized and holds all the cards, as has been entertainment tradition for all of history and as it should be. Your audience has tasted control and success in their expression of dissatisfaction to you. In my opinion the situation is plain: Do what they want or do without them. You are the Roman Gladiators, and the crowd in the Colosseum is about to give your ideological shift to the left a colossal thumbs-down
UPDATE 2: The Tea Party made history this past week - REAL history, not screwing-around "ohhhh, Ahhhhh, isn't that interesting?" history. With a snap of their figures the Tea Party with no central governing force, just a date set and advertised, knocked FOX NEWS' ratings down by 22% and when the event was confirmed, in my opinion they stare into space for 30 seconds and go back to their same old habits.
There is no way to win if victories are not celebrated and exploited. So far everyone seems to be waiting for someone important to tell them the good news because it's clear they won't believe it from me, the facts or each other. IMO, if you dio not celebrate this moment, don't dare ever open your mouths or go online to complain about anything - not ever again - because whatever befalls you and the nation will be your own fault for not seizing the moment when you had the opportunity.You have made history and only you can report it because FOX and thje MSM won't. You have to say it for yourselves. Rely on it.
****************************************
POSTS BEYOND THIS POINT HAVE BEEN EDITED. SOME REMAIN ON THE MAIN PAGE FOR NEW READERS, WHILE OTHERS HAVE BEEN PUT HERE:
"DAILY MEMO FILE CABINET"
**************************************
3.5.2013; Since it is common for even TV personality bloggers to now address their troll critics, I will post a little note to the liberal trolls on Twitter posing as conservatives to undermine the now-manifest success of our very large group: they're troll activity only works if we let it. The fact that I was initially suspended after Dakota R attacked me is clearly no coincidence. If they were conservatives and gave a damn they'd have done something besides emerge from the woodwork only now just to attack us. As anticipated, they have tried to create a distraction by turning twitter activity into a war between two groups, thus taking the heat off Obama. Sorry, we won't play. If they want to show the world they are conservatives, they can stop suspending conservatives and do something productive, like calling out media and GOP reps to prosecute Obama on Benghazi and find the missing witnesses, like hundreds of us do every day. They do nothing but "love" each other and attack us - it's plain, you can see it.
To the trolls: You aren't upsetting us. Just the reverse; we laugh at you - I mean that literally, though you can't see it - because you are liberal fools and we're going to win.
Everyone else, please ignore the trolls. They are trying to get us off-message. Regard their attacks against us as a breath of fresh air - it means we're winning, and the more they attack us the more you should laugh and enjoy it, because it's proof they're frightened because we're making headway into seeing to it that the Benghazi slain will see justice and the Benghazi murders will be Obama's Watergate. Liberals have used every means to destroy Republicans since and including Nixon, but Benghazi cannot be shrugged off into oblivion by an accommodating media. Karma is a bitch. So just laugh at the trolls, enjoy it and get on with business. They really are stupid and funny. ;) Look at them - think about it.... they are!
We're winning this now, inch by inch. The progress is manifest and obvious. If we keep going like this we're going to win. Don't let tripping over trolls get in the way. To quote Obama himself: FORWARD.
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday, March 4 & Tuesday, March 5,
2013
WHY BOYCOTT FOX NEWS FOR 2-DAYS OVER BENGHAZI? Why do the victims matter? Why should you care about 4 dead Americans when millions die every day around the world from disease and suffering and a lack of hope? I'll tell you why: because if the picture that is coming together about the Benghazi situation is half as bad as it appears to be, your life may depend on it, and Benghazi is the only avenue of prosecution that stands a chance because it is the only one that has been made legit through televised hearings and has champions in Congress. And the way things are shaping up, November of 2014 may be too far away.
Media is my business, so in the pursuit of clarity I am going to over-simplify this for clarity and understanding, at the probable loss of making the case fully convincing. But being convincing is no help if the reader glazes over, and if the reader is unfamiliar with the history of world propaganda, the kinds of governments certain propaganda strategies serve and how it operates today, then the reader will glaze over. So here goes with the simple version:
EQUATION: SILENCING MEDIA CRITICS WITH THREATS + MYSTERIOUS DEATHS OF EFFECTIVE CRITICS + MYSTERIOUS DEATHS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS + LIES ABOUT THE CAUSES OF THOSE DEATHS FROM TOP OFFICIALS = TEXTBOOK HISTORIES OF HITLER AND STALIN.
Now before you dismiss that as over-the-top, let me remind you what happened to people back then who did that. The elites in those countries were not stupid. Indeed, they may have been much more learned than you are now. Are you well-versed in the classics - because they were. Can you quote the great philosophers in the context to a discussion without referring to a source - because they could. Are you regarded at the height of knowing politics and fashion, entertainment and technology - because they were. And when they had made life more sensible by eliminating the voices of the people with dire warnings of horrors too incredible to be desirable, and relaxed into their easy chairs, they were but months later dragged from their homes into the streets which ran deep in their own blood. In our society, liberals should know that appeasing the dictator is never safe, because only the dumb are allowed to survive. Stalin killed as many as 60 million of his own people - let that number settle in - in part because he knew that intelligent people might wake up one day and oppose him, so many of the smartest people, brilliant enough to put him into office but not in his inner circle, were among the first to be killed.
So pay attention.
I cannot make you know or believe all the rumors and things I have seen over the years. But I can give you a publicly accessible smattering of very dramatic situations which even by themselves, each alone, should send sirens and shockwaves throughout the civilized world, because if America falls to tyranny, there will be no country left to save anyone else.
Most of this relies on videos as proof so if your internet connection is slow, ask a friend or take my word for it.
Recently, Bob Woodward was told by someone very high in Obama's administration that he would regret running a story against Obama regarding sequestration, and as far as anyone knows, as Woodward who brought down Nixon will tell you, even Nixon did not go that far. Woodward is an honored icon of Obama's own party, just as Stalin purged his own. Already see a pattern?
Then after and emboldened by Woodward, another famous democrat who has always been a party stalwart, who served in the Clinton Administration, Lanny Davis, came out with his own admission of exactly the same kind of threats from the Obama administration.
As early in Obama's presidency as 2009, now-retired Helen Thomas and others, media veterans all, called out the Administration at a briefing as being secretive and controlling, having experienced a degree of control and censorship of the media by a White House never seen in their careers. It appears that Obama is clearly doing whatever he can to control not just the discussion, but the people who participate, and that is called a tyranny and that's no joke. Once that is successfully managed a President can operate essentially with impunity and do anything he wants, like kill American citizens at-will with drones, which even the mainstream media has been forced to admit is something Obama is attempting to arrange.
Here's Helen Thomas and crowd - most liberal democrats - calling out the Obama administration for trying to control them and what they write and report on television news and newspapers.
Never in a Presidency has an administration ever claimed that a news outlet was anything other than what it was. Yet Obama and his henchman did exactly that for a few weeks straight.
Now add to that the fact that Obama is working to arrange a legal situation in which he may kill any US citizen he, alone, without due process, deems as an enemy of the US by using drones - and refuses to answer if the law he wants will allow him to engage drones arbitrarily to kill American citizens on American soil.
Add the fact that Andrew Brietbart dropped dead at the ripe old age of 43 - to my knowledge exact cause unknown - and he claimed just before the election that he had evidence to take Obama down, and he died just before the election, days before he was to release the information, all of which has yet to see the light.
Add also this producer, reasonably well-known in some circles and no lunatic, and a Hillary democrat, who claims the inside word from the Clinton camp is Obama had Bill Clinton's best friend Bill Gwatney murdered to shut him up about Obama's shaky citizenship status.
And someone else from the same Hillary camp, who makes the same claim from a different operational perspective.
Here we have Hillary Clinton (and Obama, too) lying about the murders in Benghazi being caused by an anti-Muslim video. Interesting how she defends the filmmaker's freedom of expression per our Constitution but the man continues to languish in prison, his life in mortal danger every day he remains.
As I first reported in December, the talking point about the cause of the murders being caused by a video are straight from Libyan propaganda delivered one day after the murders, even though that same Government claimed to not have a single suspect of the crime at that time - so how then could they have known the motivation? These two videos, Clinton above, and this, are alarming when put together because it very strongly suggests - almost proves - a collusion in the lie by the Obama administration and Libya. All this makes the fact that the Benghazi witnesses are missing under Obama, who after 5 months refuses to give the names to Congress, understandably extremely alarming.
So let's pause for a moment and take the opposition's point-of-view in defending Obama on this. Phrased differently and otherwise probably broken up into segments to avoid the effect the following has, amounts to this: "Just because Obama had a radical upbringing and associations all his life; a 20-year pastor famous for sermons with words like "God damn America"; is threatening the most esteemed journalists and censoring and trying to control they and all others; has been, with some significant credibility in some instances, accused of being responsible for the murders of politically effective opponents; wants to be able to electronically kill his own country's citizens at-will on a whim; and turned his back on an Ambassador and let him die and has hidden the witnesses - human beings like ourselves - from the world for five months, doesn't mean he is in any way following the pattern of Hitler."
To that remark I could only offer the following: I'm sorry - that is exactly how it appears.
I hope that was all sufficient and easily understandable enough. Conclusion: In my opinion Obama could be an extremely unstable and dangerous character who rose to power because his megalomania allowed him to project untruths with remarkably convincing authority. To Assume he is not such a person, IMO, repeats the very bad - and then manifestly un-learned - lessons of the past. The fact is this country and its 314 million people are more important than the very shaky ideological aspirations of one man and the heartbreak he may or may not feel if he doesn't get everything the way he wants it.
I suggest you all go to an older library and read books written before the internet on Stalin's Russia and Hitler's Nazi Germany. One such particularly strongly recommended book is, "Inside The Third Reich, Memoirs of Albert Speer" (one of Hitler's confidants), 1970. Do not trust revised quotes on the internet, where revising history is becoming rampant. I am expecting someday soon for Obama to call for the destruction of conventional libraries "to save our forests" and be replaced with internet "Truth Centers", so as to once and for all eliminate the written evidence of the horrific realities of the past dictators he may or may not exemplify.
As I watch him attempt to disarm the public and I study more pronounced quirks and idiosyncrasies - for example, he has dropped the "white man accent" from 2008 but still delivers his speeches with the same now-famous mechanical sine-wave pattern style, raising his tone nearing the end of a sentence, and finishing in a declarative form which suggests a man both uncomfortable with himself and one for whom every statement by him is to be taken without debate - anathema in a free society - and watch what he has and is attempting to do, the chronology, the approaches, the now-seeming paranoia, I grow concerned that he has spent much time reading the biographies and autobiographies of dictators and has filled the holes in his personality, created by his self-doubt as a youth of which he himself wrote, by creating a self-identity pieced together by parts of dictators' lives and personalities that appeal to him. More about that some other time.
So what does that have to do with a FOX boycott? Because CNN, MSNBC and the networks will never come to us or make our arguments - they are essentially as monolithic and aligned in purpose as Hitler's grand design for a ministry of propaganda, realized. But FOX needs us. Indeed, their ratings have fallen in many cases almost 50% in the last two years. Two years ago, O'Reilly was over 6 million per night. He is officially down to 3.5 - notice he no longer cites the numbers, just says he "beats the competition", which is no accomplishment since the competition is diffused all over the cable bandwidth and FOX is the only so-called conservative network; in theory, all conservatives should be watching, and now gets barely a fraction. FOX needs us, so if we can get them to understand that the drops in viewership are related specifically to our protests representing our displeasure, in theory, too, they should run back to us, just to stay in business. They need us more than we need them, but America needs both together badly. But we can no longer go to them - they have turned left, badly. If we sit and do nothing, that is what we will get now in return: nothing. So the boycotts are crucial. I doubt the first one will be as big as we need it. But then when we started the Twitter campaign I had no idea that we would be arguing and winning, one-on-one, against Fox host personalities, Congressmen, and getting support from a few personalities who are very well-placed. One of our members also has a tight contact inside one of the congressman's offices and has said they have been told by the office contact that our - meaning yours, too - Twitter activity was 100% responsible for that Congressman to take decisive action regarding Benghazi. There are no delusions here - we're making solid progress, manifestly. So when it comes to FOX also, we can - indeed positively must - but try. The good news is even if we fail at FOX, it effects our continued progress on Twitter not one bit - Twitter effects FOX, but FOX does not effect Twitter; one of a few lucky breaks we can count on, absolutely.
Additionally, as an illustration of something that appears to be a partial case in the matter of FOX News, I show this other clip from "Network". Bear in mind, in the 50's though the 70's, controversial subjects had to be encased in a particular genre to be regarded as palatable for the audience. Racism and totalitarianism were often science fiction scenarios projected into the future as cautionary tales. Certainly if Paddy Chayefsky had written Network as a straight cautionary tale, Hollywood would have never produced it. Hence, then, the theater of the absurd "dark comedy" moments in the beginning and end of the sequence. But it's clear - indeed famous among the media for - being no joke in its final speech delivered by the character of Howard Beale, a newsman gone mad from the frustration of the world from which and to which he reads the happenings day in and day out, ultimately breaking down and, in twisted fate, becoming a prime time talk sensation. One can easily apply the truth of that speech - a sparse truth then, but a huge one today - to all the the media, realistically. I offer this to further press the need for the boycott, because I need not tell you how this applies, and it's easier to grasp the idea here than you watching me write about it:
Roll up your sleeves. Let's honor the dead in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia by proving that their lives were not squandered, and that we learned the lessons of the causes of their murders and made the world a better place for it.
Remember, in times like this there are no neutral inactions; You either fight the enemy, or you have joined them; you can't sit it out - the bleachers on the sidelines are already filled by the ghosts of the people who did not learn this lesson.
2013
WHY BOYCOTT FOX NEWS FOR 2-DAYS OVER BENGHAZI? Why do the victims matter? Why should you care about 4 dead Americans when millions die every day around the world from disease and suffering and a lack of hope? I'll tell you why: because if the picture that is coming together about the Benghazi situation is half as bad as it appears to be, your life may depend on it, and Benghazi is the only avenue of prosecution that stands a chance because it is the only one that has been made legit through televised hearings and has champions in Congress. And the way things are shaping up, November of 2014 may be too far away.
Media is my business, so in the pursuit of clarity I am going to over-simplify this for clarity and understanding, at the probable loss of making the case fully convincing. But being convincing is no help if the reader glazes over, and if the reader is unfamiliar with the history of world propaganda, the kinds of governments certain propaganda strategies serve and how it operates today, then the reader will glaze over. So here goes with the simple version:
EQUATION: SILENCING MEDIA CRITICS WITH THREATS + MYSTERIOUS DEATHS OF EFFECTIVE CRITICS + MYSTERIOUS DEATHS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS + LIES ABOUT THE CAUSES OF THOSE DEATHS FROM TOP OFFICIALS = TEXTBOOK HISTORIES OF HITLER AND STALIN.
Now before you dismiss that as over-the-top, let me remind you what happened to people back then who did that. The elites in those countries were not stupid. Indeed, they may have been much more learned than you are now. Are you well-versed in the classics - because they were. Can you quote the great philosophers in the context to a discussion without referring to a source - because they could. Are you regarded at the height of knowing politics and fashion, entertainment and technology - because they were. And when they had made life more sensible by eliminating the voices of the people with dire warnings of horrors too incredible to be desirable, and relaxed into their easy chairs, they were but months later dragged from their homes into the streets which ran deep in their own blood. In our society, liberals should know that appeasing the dictator is never safe, because only the dumb are allowed to survive. Stalin killed as many as 60 million of his own people - let that number settle in - in part because he knew that intelligent people might wake up one day and oppose him, so many of the smartest people, brilliant enough to put him into office but not in his inner circle, were among the first to be killed.
So pay attention.
I cannot make you know or believe all the rumors and things I have seen over the years. But I can give you a publicly accessible smattering of very dramatic situations which even by themselves, each alone, should send sirens and shockwaves throughout the civilized world, because if America falls to tyranny, there will be no country left to save anyone else.
Most of this relies on videos as proof so if your internet connection is slow, ask a friend or take my word for it.
Recently, Bob Woodward was told by someone very high in Obama's administration that he would regret running a story against Obama regarding sequestration, and as far as anyone knows, as Woodward who brought down Nixon will tell you, even Nixon did not go that far. Woodward is an honored icon of Obama's own party, just as Stalin purged his own. Already see a pattern?
Then after and emboldened by Woodward, another famous democrat who has always been a party stalwart, who served in the Clinton Administration, Lanny Davis, came out with his own admission of exactly the same kind of threats from the Obama administration.
As early in Obama's presidency as 2009, now-retired Helen Thomas and others, media veterans all, called out the Administration at a briefing as being secretive and controlling, having experienced a degree of control and censorship of the media by a White House never seen in their careers. It appears that Obama is clearly doing whatever he can to control not just the discussion, but the people who participate, and that is called a tyranny and that's no joke. Once that is successfully managed a President can operate essentially with impunity and do anything he wants, like kill American citizens at-will with drones, which even the mainstream media has been forced to admit is something Obama is attempting to arrange.
Here's Helen Thomas and crowd - most liberal democrats - calling out the Obama administration for trying to control them and what they write and report on television news and newspapers.
Never in a Presidency has an administration ever claimed that a news outlet was anything other than what it was. Yet Obama and his henchman did exactly that for a few weeks straight.
Now add to that the fact that Obama is working to arrange a legal situation in which he may kill any US citizen he, alone, without due process, deems as an enemy of the US by using drones - and refuses to answer if the law he wants will allow him to engage drones arbitrarily to kill American citizens on American soil.
Add the fact that Andrew Brietbart dropped dead at the ripe old age of 43 - to my knowledge exact cause unknown - and he claimed just before the election that he had evidence to take Obama down, and he died just before the election, days before he was to release the information, all of which has yet to see the light.
Add also this producer, reasonably well-known in some circles and no lunatic, and a Hillary democrat, who claims the inside word from the Clinton camp is Obama had Bill Clinton's best friend Bill Gwatney murdered to shut him up about Obama's shaky citizenship status.
And someone else from the same Hillary camp, who makes the same claim from a different operational perspective.
Here we have Hillary Clinton (and Obama, too) lying about the murders in Benghazi being caused by an anti-Muslim video. Interesting how she defends the filmmaker's freedom of expression per our Constitution but the man continues to languish in prison, his life in mortal danger every day he remains.
As I first reported in December, the talking point about the cause of the murders being caused by a video are straight from Libyan propaganda delivered one day after the murders, even though that same Government claimed to not have a single suspect of the crime at that time - so how then could they have known the motivation? These two videos, Clinton above, and this, are alarming when put together because it very strongly suggests - almost proves - a collusion in the lie by the Obama administration and Libya. All this makes the fact that the Benghazi witnesses are missing under Obama, who after 5 months refuses to give the names to Congress, understandably extremely alarming.
So let's pause for a moment and take the opposition's point-of-view in defending Obama on this. Phrased differently and otherwise probably broken up into segments to avoid the effect the following has, amounts to this: "Just because Obama had a radical upbringing and associations all his life; a 20-year pastor famous for sermons with words like "God damn America"; is threatening the most esteemed journalists and censoring and trying to control they and all others; has been, with some significant credibility in some instances, accused of being responsible for the murders of politically effective opponents; wants to be able to electronically kill his own country's citizens at-will on a whim; and turned his back on an Ambassador and let him die and has hidden the witnesses - human beings like ourselves - from the world for five months, doesn't mean he is in any way following the pattern of Hitler."
To that remark I could only offer the following: I'm sorry - that is exactly how it appears.
I hope that was all sufficient and easily understandable enough. Conclusion: In my opinion Obama could be an extremely unstable and dangerous character who rose to power because his megalomania allowed him to project untruths with remarkably convincing authority. To Assume he is not such a person, IMO, repeats the very bad - and then manifestly un-learned - lessons of the past. The fact is this country and its 314 million people are more important than the very shaky ideological aspirations of one man and the heartbreak he may or may not feel if he doesn't get everything the way he wants it.
I suggest you all go to an older library and read books written before the internet on Stalin's Russia and Hitler's Nazi Germany. One such particularly strongly recommended book is, "Inside The Third Reich, Memoirs of Albert Speer" (one of Hitler's confidants), 1970. Do not trust revised quotes on the internet, where revising history is becoming rampant. I am expecting someday soon for Obama to call for the destruction of conventional libraries "to save our forests" and be replaced with internet "Truth Centers", so as to once and for all eliminate the written evidence of the horrific realities of the past dictators he may or may not exemplify.
As I watch him attempt to disarm the public and I study more pronounced quirks and idiosyncrasies - for example, he has dropped the "white man accent" from 2008 but still delivers his speeches with the same now-famous mechanical sine-wave pattern style, raising his tone nearing the end of a sentence, and finishing in a declarative form which suggests a man both uncomfortable with himself and one for whom every statement by him is to be taken without debate - anathema in a free society - and watch what he has and is attempting to do, the chronology, the approaches, the now-seeming paranoia, I grow concerned that he has spent much time reading the biographies and autobiographies of dictators and has filled the holes in his personality, created by his self-doubt as a youth of which he himself wrote, by creating a self-identity pieced together by parts of dictators' lives and personalities that appeal to him. More about that some other time.
So what does that have to do with a FOX boycott? Because CNN, MSNBC and the networks will never come to us or make our arguments - they are essentially as monolithic and aligned in purpose as Hitler's grand design for a ministry of propaganda, realized. But FOX needs us. Indeed, their ratings have fallen in many cases almost 50% in the last two years. Two years ago, O'Reilly was over 6 million per night. He is officially down to 3.5 - notice he no longer cites the numbers, just says he "beats the competition", which is no accomplishment since the competition is diffused all over the cable bandwidth and FOX is the only so-called conservative network; in theory, all conservatives should be watching, and now gets barely a fraction. FOX needs us, so if we can get them to understand that the drops in viewership are related specifically to our protests representing our displeasure, in theory, too, they should run back to us, just to stay in business. They need us more than we need them, but America needs both together badly. But we can no longer go to them - they have turned left, badly. If we sit and do nothing, that is what we will get now in return: nothing. So the boycotts are crucial. I doubt the first one will be as big as we need it. But then when we started the Twitter campaign I had no idea that we would be arguing and winning, one-on-one, against Fox host personalities, Congressmen, and getting support from a few personalities who are very well-placed. One of our members also has a tight contact inside one of the congressman's offices and has said they have been told by the office contact that our - meaning yours, too - Twitter activity was 100% responsible for that Congressman to take decisive action regarding Benghazi. There are no delusions here - we're making solid progress, manifestly. So when it comes to FOX also, we can - indeed positively must - but try. The good news is even if we fail at FOX, it effects our continued progress on Twitter not one bit - Twitter effects FOX, but FOX does not effect Twitter; one of a few lucky breaks we can count on, absolutely.
Additionally, as an illustration of something that appears to be a partial case in the matter of FOX News, I show this other clip from "Network". Bear in mind, in the 50's though the 70's, controversial subjects had to be encased in a particular genre to be regarded as palatable for the audience. Racism and totalitarianism were often science fiction scenarios projected into the future as cautionary tales. Certainly if Paddy Chayefsky had written Network as a straight cautionary tale, Hollywood would have never produced it. Hence, then, the theater of the absurd "dark comedy" moments in the beginning and end of the sequence. But it's clear - indeed famous among the media for - being no joke in its final speech delivered by the character of Howard Beale, a newsman gone mad from the frustration of the world from which and to which he reads the happenings day in and day out, ultimately breaking down and, in twisted fate, becoming a prime time talk sensation. One can easily apply the truth of that speech - a sparse truth then, but a huge one today - to all the the media, realistically. I offer this to further press the need for the boycott, because I need not tell you how this applies, and it's easier to grasp the idea here than you watching me write about it:
Roll up your sleeves. Let's honor the dead in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia by proving that their lives were not squandered, and that we learned the lessons of the causes of their murders and made the world a better place for it.
Remember, in times like this there are no neutral inactions; You either fight the enemy, or you have joined them; you can't sit it out - the bleachers on the sidelines are already filled by the ghosts of the people who did not learn this lesson.
**************************
POSTS BETWEEN THE ABOVE AND BELOW MEMOS HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE ARCHIVE LIBRARY
*****************************************
PROVED WITH THE VIDEO EVIDENCE:
HERE IS THE SOURCE OF OBAMA'S BOGUS STORY ABOUT THE
BENGHAZI KILLINGS BEING DUE TO ANTI-MUSLIM VIDEO; FOX NEWS, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION
OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION SIMPLY PARROTED - VERBATIM - THE DETAIL-RICH BUT ENTIRELY UNTRUE LIBYAN PROPAGANDA COMING FROM EASTERN NEWS/TELEVISION SOURCES MERE HOURS AFTER THE KILLINGS ,ON SEPT 12, 2012.
Fox News: If you don't think this is important, you need your collective head examined.
The video, above, is from news sources coming out of the Middle East, uploaded by Middle eastern news sources. Check the original upload date: Sept 12, 2012. This pre-dates when Clinton and Obama starting citing the excuse of the video as an explanation for the killings, and that timing suggests that Obama and Clinton were complicit with the Libyan Government in at least the cover-up.
Our pathetic media and leaders continue to ask and wonder,"Where did the talking points come from - the ones about the video that supposedly outraged the Muslim world?" It came from Libyan Government Propaganda - released mere hours after the Benghazi attack - which Obama, Clinton and Rice repeated to everyone including the United Nations by Obama himself.If you think it was a coincidence you're crazy; the world does not work like that, as everyone knows.
Incredibly, this evidence was found easily by doing a specialized Youtube search of publicly available international news sources. This is something our media and politicians should have checked first.
It is clear that the Obama Administration appears to have been acting knowingly as the US distribution office of Libyan propaganda which blamed the US for instigating the killings of our own people. Interesting, it should be noted that worded differently, the part about blaming the victims for their own deaths is the same conclusion reached by the State Dept's own internal investigation which, in so doing, cleared itself. It's all coming from the same source: corrupt Libya propaganda sources.
Watch the video linked at the top of this article. Should this video, linked above, vanish from the internet, it will be replaced by our own copy which we will upload via the Fair Use Act. This is important.
ADDITIONAL
The following may be dismissed by many as "internet conspiracy theory" and so be it. As someone with over 20 years media experience in competition-heavy NYC, at this point I could care less about the opinions of intellectually dishonest mainstream media. This includes FOX NEWS which pretends to be divorced somehow from the mainstream even though they have the highest ratings on cable, and who also manifestly ignore or even mock those issues which are truly politically damaging to Obama. Know it: FOX NEWS can be regarded, at best, as "Mainstream Media Light". IMO their posturing as anything else is an insulting con job to conservatives. The facts are what they are.
The Libyan talking points in the eastern television news reports are extremely precise and well-informed for the reporting on a "mob event" that occurred less than 12 hours before the Government made its explanation. They had supposedly in less than 12 hours pin-pointed a video which caused an outrage. But that video caused no mob protest and outrage, which suggests it had already been chosen to be the scapegoat "cause" of presumed premeditated murders by the Libyan government through terrorist operatives, otherwise the chances of all this hand-in-glove timing would be essentially physically impossible: too fast, too detailed for a Government claiming to have not even a single suspect from which to glean reliable information.
This probably explains why Obama and Clinton sent Rice out to repeat the bogus Libyan talking points. At least initially, it's clear they did not want to be found to be officially repeating the Libyan propaganda - which in-part accuses the west of starting the violence via an imaginary scenario which never occurred.
We continue to know that seven (7) hours went by in which Obama did not issue orders to help, but did apparently issue orders to stand down. There has been much speculation that Stevens was either involved in or became aware of gun-running sanctioned by the United States.
Therefore, for Bengahzi-Truth, for whatever it may mean, there appears to be only one likely scenario now, as mind-bending as it may sound: This was a premeditated set-up to kill Stevens by the Libyan Government who had their excuses in place in advance, and the Obama administration was either complicit in the plan/murder itself or a cover-up after the fact. The Libyan government has too many of the usual unknowns accounted for less than a day after the murders for an outfit claiming to be unaware of who committed the actual crimes.
The most alarming aspect of all this is that that all the surviving witnesses, flown out of Benghazi on a US C130, remain hidden by the Obama Administration after over 5 months - the most alarming fact after the murder since it reeks of a Soviet-style silencing of the witnessing (before you dismiss such a notion, never assume that "it can not happen here" - that is what the very well-educated German and Soviet people, who were well-read in the classics, art, philosophy and fashion, said before the streets ran deep in their own blood). Even Congress does not know who the survivor witnesses are are, where they are or why, though Congress has started to make it clear they're getting impatient on this matter, particularly, though even that seems Johnny-come-lately. Congress is usually apprised of the info of such info, according to House Rep Jason Chaffetz (R- Colorado), within 48 hours. It's going on 5 months.
Unfortunately, all this plays into the idea that Libya and/or Obama wanted Stevens dead, and the presumed original plan was that all would die. Then ex-seals Woods and Doherty screwed up the plan by disobeying stand-down orders and rescued 20 - 30 unwanted witnesses with with which the administration has no plan to handle - witnesses Obama clearly does not want to speak, since witnesses from Algeria, for example, were made available immediately after that event. This scenario is now my personal belief of wheat happen in Benghazi and why. Obama does not comes from a peaceful political background or ideological outlook. Indeed, he is the only President in US history to use the word "revenge" when discussing addressing his political opposition. The idea what he would - by an act of seeming negligence, done deliberately - murder people who could prove to be politically difficult for his plans for re-election is not a remotely implausible theory to attribute to a man who advocates Revenge upon people for no other reason than they stand in the way of his own political ambitions.
So, while the House dithers and FOX NEWS calls everyone but themselves "Mainstream Media", what is happening to these survivors? Will they turn up with "tragic brain damage sustained in the attacks" or will the world be told that the original records were wrong, there was only one survivor, in Walter Reed, and that all doctors agree that his brain damage was caused by the attack? Impossible? Ask the man who advocated "revenge".
The GOP House needs to issue subpoenas for Clinton (to return), a Grand Jury for Obama, immediately subpoena the records that will identify the remaining witnesses - the C130 manifest and the FBI records to start - and subpoena them to testify and should not stand on ceremony. The GOP House needs to find its inner rage and they need to issue subpoenas for all of the above and they need to issue them now.
FOX NEWS HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE.SO DOES CONGRESS. Many of us are tired of supplying Fox News with their ratings from which they glean advertising revenue and tired of paying for the electricity in the GOP house offices while both refuse to do the jobs for which they beg our attention and votes. Playtime is over. It's time to get down to work.
FOX NEWS hosts and reporters - If you need to be given a template with which to set you to your jobs investigating Benghazi just do this: All of you pretend that you are Dan Rather and Obama is a Republican. If I need to explain that, then please resign. We're running out of patience.
We're also tired of being asked to do your jobs for you as is apparent in the screenshots from FOX hosts and Rep Rohrabacher. WE PAY YOU BOTH. GET TO WORK
The most alarming aspect of all this is that that all the surviving witnesses, flown out of Benghazi on a US C130, remain hidden by the Obama Administration after over 5 months - the most alarming fact after the murder since it reeks of a Soviet-style silencing of the witnessing (before you dismiss such a notion, never assume that "it can not happen here" - that is what the very well-educated German and Soviet people, who were well-read in the classics, art, philosophy and fashion, said before the streets ran deep in their own blood). Even Congress does not know who the survivor witnesses are are, where they are or why, though Congress has started to make it clear they're getting impatient on this matter, particularly, though even that seems Johnny-come-lately. Congress is usually apprised of the info of such info, according to House Rep Jason Chaffetz (R- Colorado), within 48 hours. It's going on 5 months.
Unfortunately, all this plays into the idea that Libya and/or Obama wanted Stevens dead, and the presumed original plan was that all would die. Then ex-seals Woods and Doherty screwed up the plan by disobeying stand-down orders and rescued 20 - 30 unwanted witnesses with with which the administration has no plan to handle - witnesses Obama clearly does not want to speak, since witnesses from Algeria, for example, were made available immediately after that event. This scenario is now my personal belief of wheat happen in Benghazi and why. Obama does not comes from a peaceful political background or ideological outlook. Indeed, he is the only President in US history to use the word "revenge" when discussing addressing his political opposition. The idea what he would - by an act of seeming negligence, done deliberately - murder people who could prove to be politically difficult for his plans for re-election is not a remotely implausible theory to attribute to a man who advocates Revenge upon people for no other reason than they stand in the way of his own political ambitions.
So, while the House dithers and FOX NEWS calls everyone but themselves "Mainstream Media", what is happening to these survivors? Will they turn up with "tragic brain damage sustained in the attacks" or will the world be told that the original records were wrong, there was only one survivor, in Walter Reed, and that all doctors agree that his brain damage was caused by the attack? Impossible? Ask the man who advocated "revenge".
The GOP House needs to issue subpoenas for Clinton (to return), a Grand Jury for Obama, immediately subpoena the records that will identify the remaining witnesses - the C130 manifest and the FBI records to start - and subpoena them to testify and should not stand on ceremony. The GOP House needs to find its inner rage and they need to issue subpoenas for all of the above and they need to issue them now.
FOX NEWS HAS AN OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE.SO DOES CONGRESS. Many of us are tired of supplying Fox News with their ratings from which they glean advertising revenue and tired of paying for the electricity in the GOP house offices while both refuse to do the jobs for which they beg our attention and votes. Playtime is over. It's time to get down to work.
FOX NEWS hosts and reporters - If you need to be given a template with which to set you to your jobs investigating Benghazi just do this: All of you pretend that you are Dan Rather and Obama is a Republican. If I need to explain that, then please resign. We're running out of patience.
We're also tired of being asked to do your jobs for you as is apparent in the screenshots from FOX hosts and Rep Rohrabacher. WE PAY YOU BOTH. GET TO WORK
**************************
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday Feb, 25 2013
"BOYCOTT FOX NEWS" is a term which to most of us would have been unthinkable five or six years ago. At that time while Fox ignored the birth certificate issue which seemed to still be a kind of lunatic fringe conspiracy theory - before Obama released a fake birth certificate and changed the landscape of that debate - Fox was doing the heavy lifting generally: Hannity was all over Reverend Wright, they made Sarah Palin front and center, they covered the 9-12 1.5 million-person march in DC later against Obamacare, O'Reilly was rightfully yelling at Barney Frank for destabilizing the United states economy via impossible demands on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack - though O'Reilly was making Al Sharpton legit (also unthinkable 5 years before that) and Shepard Smith was still pretending to not be a shill for the left.
All that has changed. Now that Sheriff Joe Arpaio - with 50(!) years law enforcement experience - 30 in the Fed - and constituency of 5 million people determined with his investigators that Obama's birth certificate is a fake, Fox remains silent. Indeed, Arpaio used to be seen regularly on Fox, but no more. Obama's social security issue? Very compelling indeed - anyone can look up the law and see the numbers reported as being Obama's come from Connecticut, and his terrorist pal Bill Ayres has boasted of the Weather Underground using fake SS numbers to elevate members to power. Fox? Nothing.
But the issue of the missing Benghazi witnesses survivors, whose identities have not been released to the Congress for more than 5 months - when Reps like Chaffetz state they are usually apprised in 48 hours, is the last straw. No one can call Benghazi a conspiracy theory. We know the people were murdered - the first Ambassador murdered in 40 years. It's been a big deal. People sat in front of their TVs and watched Hillary look ridiculous reading testimony answers she prepared for months when she should have been recuperating from a concussion. A few strong senators are still determined on the Benghazi issue. Speaker John Boehner looks hopeless, his uncontrollable crying fits on national television, punctuated by spams and wretched facial anguish, appears to be suffering from clinical depression and may not even be in his right mind. And still, for all that, Fox News reports on a murder in Africa (!) day in and out and appears to now being deliberately cover for Obama on the issue of Banghazi.
For as much progress as we have made, my - and our - concern is that over the weeks and months the media and Obama will simply wait us out until the issue simply vanishes from sedentary collapse. No situation, no matter what it is, can exist in an absolute perpetual steady state. It either grows or it dies. Therefore, we are taking the next step while this movement is still in its infancy and very much growing: we are calling for a 2-day boycott - and I mean a total viewer blackout - 100% - of Fox News on an soon/upcoming Friday and Saturday, and we think he can make a huge dent in their ratings. Their ratings are how they get their revenue. The lower the ratings, the less they can charge for advertising fees. A 30% drop, for example, in viewership over 2 days would send alarms throughout all of NewsCorp - especially since if we can do it once, we can do it again - or permanently Indeed, some people, weened of Fox for 2 days, may like life better without it,m and then those people are gone for good. Fox will be aware of that possibility, too.
This boycott viewer blackout is not meant to maliciously hurt their business. It is meant to send a message from audience to entertainment provider: FOX NEWS, WE'RE FED UP WITH BEING TAKEN FOR GRANTED. REPORT WHAT WE WANT TO SEE OR WE WILL STOP WATCHING. PERIOD.
I will post links and screenshots to ratings converge online, so no one need guess the before and after effect and play in a daydream world, making up stories as so often happens in online grassroots activism. We will have the hard numbers here, before and after, so you know you will have immediate no-fooling-around concrete skin in this game.
It's as simple as that. So far we have several Tea Party leaders, a couple of notables and a conservative California radio host who have all said "I'm in".
FOX mocked the "birthers" - who were right. Ignoreed the SS number. Threw Arpaio under the bus. Threw a couple of general guests from years past under the bus. They keep RINO Rove but let go Sarah Palin - who has more followers on twitter than any Fox host, including O'Reilly. Now they are making it clear they intend to cover Obama's rear end on the one issue that even some Congressmen are crying foul about: BENGHAZI and specifically tracking down the only people who can tell us what happened: the witnesses, whom Obama seems to have somehow taken some kind of control for 5 months, since not one has dared - or been able - to speak out.
CHECK IN EVERY DAY OR SO, PLEASE. THIS FOX BOYCOTT IS COMING IN JUST A WEEK OR SO. LET'S TAKE BACK AMERICA ONE RINO CABLE NEWS CHANNEL AT A TIME.
********************************
******************************
Here's another outstanding guest memo by BT's resident military expert, "Sergeant Major". Read this carefully: he makes some very important points no one else has made.
GUEST BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Tuesday Feb 12, 2013
NOTE: Unsurprisingly, this has been a particularly popular Daily Memo, so Benghazi-Truth will keep it as the top memo until Feb 15. THIS IS A MUST-READ.
By Sergeant Major
Last week the Senate Armed Forces Committee conducted a hearing into the #BENGHAZI Massacre. Five major players emerged: Senators McCain, Ayotte and Graham who "questioned" Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chief of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey. The hearing followed other #BENGHAZI hearings in that alibis were in abundance and true facts rare as a Bible in Baghdad One such fact did emerge-a big one-so stand by for that.
General Dempsey was an embarrassment. In an ill tailored uniform (sleeves too short revealing 3" of shirt cuff where regs allow for no more than a half inch), the General slouched in his chair, leaned on his elbows and answered questions with a subtle smirk on his face. His testimony began with "Yes", "No", and multiple "Yeahs" (!) instead of "Yes Sir or No Ma'am" as required by military courtesy. More to the point, his sometimes confused responses were a smorgasbord of the "not my fault", "have a lot on my plate", "you'll have to ask someone else" variety. No wonder his command failed at #BENGHAZI. To quote Patton as he reviewed his new troops in Tunisia, "They don't look like soldiers. They don't act like soldiers. How do you expect them to fight like soldiers?"
Secretary of Defense Panetta was a little better. Affecting an avuncular, even lugubrious style, Panetta was rarely shaken or goaded into intemperate ("What does it matter how they died!?") remarks. He has survived around Beltway Power in a variety of positions and knows how it works. He realizes that OBAMA is his boss and must do what he can to protect him but not at the expense of his own career. In other words, Panetta won't stab OBAMA in the back but he won't fall on his sword for him either. As such, it was Panetta that gave up the new factoid.
Of the three senators, McCain was least effective though he did take General Dempsey to task for his "surreal" testimony. This upbraiding was deserved but not germane to what happened at #BENGHAZI. Senator Ayotte was a touch too wordy, but her questions stayed on target-what was done to defend #BENGHAZI-which elicited a patronizing, disrespectful response from the General.
It was Senator Lindsey Graham that tore Panetta/Dempsey a new one. His rat-a-tat questions, interruptions of filibustering answers ("I'm Sorry to interrupt you, but I have only so much time") and stern tone kept Panetta/Dempseys' feet to the fire. Graham's questions extracted a scenario of a command in disarray and confusion with no one truly calling the shots. Graham: "Who was in charge that night?" Panetta, shrugging:"I guess we all were in charge that night."
But the best salvo came at the end.
Graham: "Was there any soldier...of any kind...deployed from any base... anywhere... enroute to support #BENGHAZI?"
The Secretary of Defense and the General fumbled for an answer until Panetta stammered, "No, because we couldn't get there in time."
To which Graham barked, "How did you know 'in time'? You didn't know before it was over when it would end."
The Big Fact revealed by Panetta was that OBAMA was AWOL that night. According to the Secretary, he and the General had a 20-30 minute briefing with the President at 5;00 pm Washington time where OBAMA was apprised of the deteriorating situation in #BENGHAZI. The President was distracted, detached and offered little guidance except, "Do what you can." All night long OBAMA did not ONCE talk to them either to ask or answer questions involving the staus of the situation at #BENGHAZI. This is important. Without rehashing a previous blog on Chain of Command, suffice to say before ANY rescue force of ANY kind can militarily enter Libyan airspace or violate Libyan boundaries these forces would first receive Presidential authorization, referred to as "Cross Border Authority". If OBAMA wanted #BENGHAZI to burn and the Ambassador to die all he need to do was make himself incommunicado, thus hamstringing the rescue effort. "Not To Act Is To Act" And that's exactly what a sleeping OBAMA did.
Still, the question remains. According to reports, a "Stand Down" order was given that night of 9/11/12. Since Hillary, Panetta, Demsey deny they gave the order, and OBAMA was sleeping, SOMEONE on the White House staff played President that night and Stood Down the rescue.
WHO GAVE THE ORDER TO STANDDOWN AT #BENGHAZI?
NOTE: Unsurprisingly, this has been a particularly popular Daily Memo, so Benghazi-Truth will keep it as the top memo until Feb 15. THIS IS A MUST-READ.
By Sergeant Major
Last week the Senate Armed Forces Committee conducted a hearing into the #BENGHAZI Massacre. Five major players emerged: Senators McCain, Ayotte and Graham who "questioned" Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chief of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey. The hearing followed other #BENGHAZI hearings in that alibis were in abundance and true facts rare as a Bible in Baghdad One such fact did emerge-a big one-so stand by for that.
General Dempsey was an embarrassment. In an ill tailored uniform (sleeves too short revealing 3" of shirt cuff where regs allow for no more than a half inch), the General slouched in his chair, leaned on his elbows and answered questions with a subtle smirk on his face. His testimony began with "Yes", "No", and multiple "Yeahs" (!) instead of "Yes Sir or No Ma'am" as required by military courtesy. More to the point, his sometimes confused responses were a smorgasbord of the "not my fault", "have a lot on my plate", "you'll have to ask someone else" variety. No wonder his command failed at #BENGHAZI. To quote Patton as he reviewed his new troops in Tunisia, "They don't look like soldiers. They don't act like soldiers. How do you expect them to fight like soldiers?"
Secretary of Defense Panetta was a little better. Affecting an avuncular, even lugubrious style, Panetta was rarely shaken or goaded into intemperate ("What does it matter how they died!?") remarks. He has survived around Beltway Power in a variety of positions and knows how it works. He realizes that OBAMA is his boss and must do what he can to protect him but not at the expense of his own career. In other words, Panetta won't stab OBAMA in the back but he won't fall on his sword for him either. As such, it was Panetta that gave up the new factoid.
Of the three senators, McCain was least effective though he did take General Dempsey to task for his "surreal" testimony. This upbraiding was deserved but not germane to what happened at #BENGHAZI. Senator Ayotte was a touch too wordy, but her questions stayed on target-what was done to defend #BENGHAZI-which elicited a patronizing, disrespectful response from the General.
It was Senator Lindsey Graham that tore Panetta/Dempsey a new one. His rat-a-tat questions, interruptions of filibustering answers ("I'm Sorry to interrupt you, but I have only so much time") and stern tone kept Panetta/Dempseys' feet to the fire. Graham's questions extracted a scenario of a command in disarray and confusion with no one truly calling the shots. Graham: "Who was in charge that night?" Panetta, shrugging:"I guess we all were in charge that night."
But the best salvo came at the end.
Graham: "Was there any soldier...of any kind...deployed from any base... anywhere... enroute to support #BENGHAZI?"
The Secretary of Defense and the General fumbled for an answer until Panetta stammered, "No, because we couldn't get there in time."
To which Graham barked, "How did you know 'in time'? You didn't know before it was over when it would end."
The Big Fact revealed by Panetta was that OBAMA was AWOL that night. According to the Secretary, he and the General had a 20-30 minute briefing with the President at 5;00 pm Washington time where OBAMA was apprised of the deteriorating situation in #BENGHAZI. The President was distracted, detached and offered little guidance except, "Do what you can." All night long OBAMA did not ONCE talk to them either to ask or answer questions involving the staus of the situation at #BENGHAZI. This is important. Without rehashing a previous blog on Chain of Command, suffice to say before ANY rescue force of ANY kind can militarily enter Libyan airspace or violate Libyan boundaries these forces would first receive Presidential authorization, referred to as "Cross Border Authority". If OBAMA wanted #BENGHAZI to burn and the Ambassador to die all he need to do was make himself incommunicado, thus hamstringing the rescue effort. "Not To Act Is To Act" And that's exactly what a sleeping OBAMA did.
Still, the question remains. According to reports, a "Stand Down" order was given that night of 9/11/12. Since Hillary, Panetta, Demsey deny they gave the order, and OBAMA was sleeping, SOMEONE on the White House staff played President that night and Stood Down the rescue.
WHO GAVE THE ORDER TO STANDDOWN AT #BENGHAZI?
EDITOR: Since Sergeant Major's Memo has been up for 2 days, I don't feel too disrespectful to reiterate what my own feeling his here so the reader knows where this blog stands on the issue generally; in the second to last paragraph, Sergeant Major notes that if Obama wanted to kill everyone in Benghazi, he needed do nothing more than turn his back and remain uncommunicative to questions and answers. It has become my own conviction that Obama did, indeed, want everyone in Benghazi dead. After all these months, only one scenario seems to hold together and fit: For whatever reason, possibly to cover gun-running, an operation Rand Paul believes was likely, IMO Obama, probably in concert with the Libyan Government whose propaganda about the killing being caused by a mob incensed by an anti-Muslim video was clearly the lead for Obama's own lie on the cause of the killings, decided that all in Benghazi must die. This seems extremely likely as Obama had many opportunities before and during Sept 11, 2012 to send reinforcements or get the people out and he very clearly intentionally did neither. With so many options to help them, it seems clear that the only way those people could be dead today is if Obama wanted them dead. What would have gone wrong, then, is the two ex-SEALS breaking ranks and saving 25-30 unwanted witnesses, and that too holds, since Obama is steadfastly refusing to give up any information to Congress about the identity or location of the witnesses after 5 months, information usually offered to Congress within 48 hours of similar events. None of the witnesses have stepped forward, nor their families, and this is of course fraught with alarming, Nazi-esque implications of unconstitutional holding or worse. As melodramatic and truly unprecedented that may sound for a situation in the United States of America, that is how the facts shake out. The people of this country are not stupid. We need to hear the witnesses and we need to hear them now.
BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMO
Filed for Monday Jan 28 and Tuesday Jan 29, 2013
(I am leaving this Daily Memo up for two consecutive work week days because the issue of the Benghazi survivors is really becoming extremely important. Media and related topics and the like are my business and IMO this country is in very big trouble, now. Don't doubt it until you read this)
EDIT: First things first - for the doubters, there are Benghazi survivors. In this video at 1:40 Johnson and Clinton discuss them - Clinton says 25 - 30 people evacuated - before Hillary explodes
DESPITE THE TEPID CONCERN DEMONSTRATED BY MOST GOP CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS and the deafening silence of the mainstream media on the issue, it is Benghazi-Truth's opinion that the 25-30 missing Benghazi survivors' missing status - missing because Obama has taken them out of society - poses the potential for the greatest crisis of freedom the United States has ever known.
"Over-the-top"? Unfortunately, no.
The missing Benghazi survivors exist and that fact has been confirmed by congress and even Hillary Clinton herself who in her Congressional testimony claimed to know they existed and are in the possession of the U.S. Government (but not know anything else despite the fact that the survivors, employed at the Benghazi Consulate, worked directly for her.) So right away we know something true and manifest and now undeniable: for over four months, 20 - 30 U.S. citizen Government employees - not military - are being hidden from society, not allowed to walk free among their fellow citizens, in almost certain alarming violation of their fundamental constitutional rights. This is not a conspiracy theory; they are citizens of the United States and the Obama administration will not tell even Congress who or where they are after over four months, even when Congressional members press them for an answer, as some have claimed to do. Our response, shouted loudly and anxiously, must be "NO". That cannot be allowed to continue in the U.S. after Obama and Clinton lied patently about the cause of the murders in the first place, a fact that even mainstream media has been forced to acknowledge. This situation constitutes a crisis because people in this country cannot be spirited off on the whim of a President, lest such casual, dictatorial activity be extended to you and me.
This kind of thing is not new in the rest of the world, however, and as always, it's time to learn some lessons from the past. At no time in world history have citizens been whisked out of their society to good moral and legal effect by the state - the reasons have always been bad and usually horrendous. Let's look at some. But first, let's put the narrative in perspective. Let's call the survivors by their significant function relative to the Benghazi investigation; let's stop calling them "survivors" now and call them what we need to begin calling them: "The Witnesses".
When witnesses are made to vanish by a Government, history teaches us without exception that what happened to them was very bad. And let's remind ourselves at every point that what happened to the Benghazi witnesses can happen to you or me.
Also, we need to correct assumptions that have led to a form of suicide by the millions: people have always assumed "the past" is always some distant and primitive epoch on the timeline, measured today as though the citizens of Nazi Germany and Communist countries like Russia and Cuba lived in some barbaric state like cave men. No. They too, believed they were in an enlightened age in which mass communication like radio, telephones and widespread published media made it absolutely impossible - they would assure themselves with a confident and bemused chuckle - for another Caesar to emerge, and their hubris about the sophistication of their society cost them the lives of tens of millions, slaughtered mercilessly in mass bloodbaths by their own governments. Cable TV, the internet and Skype will not save us from the next Hitler or Stalin. Current and future murderous tyrants will not be stopped by those technological advances, they will utilize them, and propagandists, anxious for the approval of cold-blooded dictators, will carry their water today and into the future just as they have for thousands of years past; human nature will not change, nor has it been or will be changed by our "enlightened society", as defined by better technology and mocking sarcasm about those on whose accomplishments we today live a better life.
Hitler's minister of "Public Enlightenment", Joseph Goebbels, said, "We .. intend a principled transformation in the worldview of our entire society, a revolution of the greatest possible extent that will leave nothing out, changing the life of our nation in every regard ... It would not have been possible for us to take power or to use it in the ways we have without the radio and the airplane. It is no exaggeration to say that the German revolution, at least in the form it took, would have been impossible without the airplane and the radio."
Sound familiar?
It is generally assumed that the concentration camps in Nazi Germany were reserved for Jews and their torture and extermination. Untrue. Some were used to condition, brainwash and re-create the minds of the opposition in their society so they would become, in turn, those who then, too, torture, murder - and brainwash - others. The first step is that these people would vanish from society, as the Benghazi witnesses have vanished from our society. In their day, too, politicians did what they are doing now: timid of the unknown repercussions of difficult decisions, did nothing while people vanished and leaders with uncertain pasts and the worst possible political associations rose to absolute power.
This is Theodor Eicke, who developed, ran and oversaw the Nazi concentration camp system.
Prisoners stand at attention in the Nazi concentration camp Dachau. It was famous for killing Jews. It was also one of the places used to indoctrinate political dissidents into becoming "useful servants of the Fatherland". These dissidents - and witnesses - did not enroll to be there. They were taken out of society, seemingly as Obama has taken out of society the 30 Benghazi witnesses.
Here is an example of the result of being "trained" at Dachau: SS guards assigned to the notorious concentration camp Mauthausen. After four months we have no idea where the Benghazi witnesses are. Are they being likewise 'trained"? The longer we wait and be timid about shouting for the answers the American people deserve and to which they have every right, the more difficult it will be to stop whatever is happening to the witnesses, for certainly, something must be happening; people do not exist in a literal state of limbo, their friends and families silenced as surely as they have been.
For more about Dachau, though the information is everywhere, you might be interested in this BRIEF HISTORY.
When Goebbels fell out of favor with Hitler for a while, this was the result: removed from photographs - removed by people working for Hitler, and a comparison could be drawn to whoever did the airbrushing to people like Chris Matthews who in my opinion is a perfect example of what Goebbels himself advocated: self-censorship on the part of the media for the good of the Fatherland. Photos courtesy Dartmouth Edu & used via the Fair Use Act.
"It's impossible" is the refrain when witnesses vanish because people refuse to suffer the emotional pain of disappointment today to save themselves and their country from annihilation tomorrow.
Stalin was a truly dashing and smoulderingly handsome, charming revolutionary hero in Russia 1902.
He grew into the epitome of the kind and benign leader whose only concern was to help the people whom he loved and who loved him back, reading and listening to him in their media, convinced that only lunatics would accuse him of....
... murdering 40 million of his own people for purely political purposes, two of whom lie dead here in the frozen snow - a mother and her young son. I will spare the reader the displeasure of photographs of Communist Stalin's atrocities so vast they make Hitler's murders of the Jews look like a mere admonishment for wrongdoing.
History sees the same pattern in the beginning of Stalin's rein of terror as Hitler and now Obama: Lies about the causes of deaths of politicians - and ambassador's - are discovered, media controlled by willing accomplices censor themselves to gain favor with the tyrant and information re-created to suit the desires of the Government.
And witnesses to Stalin's crimes vanished, just as surely as the Benghazi victims cannot be identified or found, though all agree they do - or did - exist. The people under Stalin were just as aware and awake as you are reading this now. They were not uneducated. They were talented, well-versed, often highly sophisticated who were well-read in the classics, could quote without effort the great philosophers and excelled in all the arts. They worshiped God publicly before Christian references were outlawed in public. They listened to media commentators praise Stalin for his leadership and mock the "crazy people" who made claims so awful that they could not possibly be true to a reasonable mind. They were not barbarians. They lived in an enlightened, technological age in which no well-meaning citizen needed a gun because Caesars were impossible. They loved and wrote, played and performed, engaged in style and fashion, worked and thrived and laughed at the town criers without checking the facts of their presumed political absurdities. And the streets eventually ran deep in their own blood.
You can read an interesting little thing along these lines at the New York Times, HERE
Communist China's Chairman Mao: the same pattern. Witnesses to atrocities vanish, guns taken from people who collectively believe their world is too sophisticated for Caesars and trust the media which voluntarily censors itself to gain favor with the tyrant and the image the media painted of the benign, handsome, loving and well-meaning leader. The photographs of the many thousands of human heads of Mao's victims - the political opposition - stacked in giant piles are too horrifying and nauseating to even begin to contemplate publishing here.
Cuba's murderous Castro in 1968; guns taken from people, media complicit - fawning over the handsome, loving leader of all good people - and censoring itself before being taken over by the tyrant they tried to please, murders millions of the political opposition, and as seen here, witnesses are made to disappear, and as always, their families also said nothing when they vanished.
This could go on forever. The pattern of Obama's political activity is clear. But the fact that there are Benghazi witnesses who have vanished means we can stop this madness legally right now; we can, though the GOP House, demand all information on the witnesses who must then be medically/psychologically evaluated and made sure to be who it is claimed they are. This is not fun and games anymore. If Obama's pattern - now including the hiding of witnesses to an atrocity - are half of what it seems, then we must demand action - and make sure we get it - to simply save ourselves. That means we have to do what most other citizens in times past failed to do: we must motivate frightened and feckless politicians to show courage they do not possess by instinct. Warn them in the most severe possible terms of political loss in 2014 - and put meat into the threat by openly, loudly and immediately calling for tea party recruits to challenge them in the 2014 primaries. This is all we have left. If we fail, we risk living - or worse - under another Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Castro.
Look at this simple video collection of bizarre public statements by Obama and ask yourself if he should be trusted with the Benghazi witnesses merely on faith of his good intentions and the picture of him painted by the media.
"Over the top"? Ask all those who also mocked the "crazy person" who warned of horrific dangers because in their enlightened age, Caesars were impossible; history books are full of pictures of their stiff, naked corpses piled high by the millions.
FIND THE BENGHAZI WITNESSES and be sure they have not been 'conditioned" and are who they say they are. The time for good manners is over. The pattern is clear and absolutely irrefutable with the advent of the missing/hidden Benghazi witnesses: From any historical perspective whatsoever, this is past a series of coincidences being a reasonable explanation; this country appears to be on the verge of the worst crisis in its history. But it can still be stopped.
I never ask you to share and tweet these Daily Memos. I am asking you to share this one. IMO this entire country is in much worse trouble than all but a few may fully realize and appreciate. FIND THE BENGHAZI WITNESSES and at least set this country back into some small sense of balance before it's too late. Do it now.
DESPITE THE TEPID CONCERN DEMONSTRATED BY MOST GOP CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS and the deafening silence of the mainstream media on the issue, it is Benghazi-Truth's opinion that the 25-30 missing Benghazi survivors' missing status - missing because Obama has taken them out of society - poses the potential for the greatest crisis of freedom the United States has ever known.
"Over-the-top"? Unfortunately, no.
The missing Benghazi survivors exist and that fact has been confirmed by congress and even Hillary Clinton herself who in her Congressional testimony claimed to know they existed and are in the possession of the U.S. Government (but not know anything else despite the fact that the survivors, employed at the Benghazi Consulate, worked directly for her.) So right away we know something true and manifest and now undeniable: for over four months, 20 - 30 U.S. citizen Government employees - not military - are being hidden from society, not allowed to walk free among their fellow citizens, in almost certain alarming violation of their fundamental constitutional rights. This is not a conspiracy theory; they are citizens of the United States and the Obama administration will not tell even Congress who or where they are after over four months, even when Congressional members press them for an answer, as some have claimed to do. Our response, shouted loudly and anxiously, must be "NO". That cannot be allowed to continue in the U.S. after Obama and Clinton lied patently about the cause of the murders in the first place, a fact that even mainstream media has been forced to acknowledge. This situation constitutes a crisis because people in this country cannot be spirited off on the whim of a President, lest such casual, dictatorial activity be extended to you and me.
This kind of thing is not new in the rest of the world, however, and as always, it's time to learn some lessons from the past. At no time in world history have citizens been whisked out of their society to good moral and legal effect by the state - the reasons have always been bad and usually horrendous. Let's look at some. But first, let's put the narrative in perspective. Let's call the survivors by their significant function relative to the Benghazi investigation; let's stop calling them "survivors" now and call them what we need to begin calling them: "The Witnesses".
When witnesses are made to vanish by a Government, history teaches us without exception that what happened to them was very bad. And let's remind ourselves at every point that what happened to the Benghazi witnesses can happen to you or me.
Also, we need to correct assumptions that have led to a form of suicide by the millions: people have always assumed "the past" is always some distant and primitive epoch on the timeline, measured today as though the citizens of Nazi Germany and Communist countries like Russia and Cuba lived in some barbaric state like cave men. No. They too, believed they were in an enlightened age in which mass communication like radio, telephones and widespread published media made it absolutely impossible - they would assure themselves with a confident and bemused chuckle - for another Caesar to emerge, and their hubris about the sophistication of their society cost them the lives of tens of millions, slaughtered mercilessly in mass bloodbaths by their own governments. Cable TV, the internet and Skype will not save us from the next Hitler or Stalin. Current and future murderous tyrants will not be stopped by those technological advances, they will utilize them, and propagandists, anxious for the approval of cold-blooded dictators, will carry their water today and into the future just as they have for thousands of years past; human nature will not change, nor has it been or will be changed by our "enlightened society", as defined by better technology and mocking sarcasm about those on whose accomplishments we today live a better life.
Hitler's minister of "Public Enlightenment", Joseph Goebbels, said, "We .. intend a principled transformation in the worldview of our entire society, a revolution of the greatest possible extent that will leave nothing out, changing the life of our nation in every regard ... It would not have been possible for us to take power or to use it in the ways we have without the radio and the airplane. It is no exaggeration to say that the German revolution, at least in the form it took, would have been impossible without the airplane and the radio."
Sound familiar?
It is generally assumed that the concentration camps in Nazi Germany were reserved for Jews and their torture and extermination. Untrue. Some were used to condition, brainwash and re-create the minds of the opposition in their society so they would become, in turn, those who then, too, torture, murder - and brainwash - others. The first step is that these people would vanish from society, as the Benghazi witnesses have vanished from our society. In their day, too, politicians did what they are doing now: timid of the unknown repercussions of difficult decisions, did nothing while people vanished and leaders with uncertain pasts and the worst possible political associations rose to absolute power.
This is Theodor Eicke, who developed, ran and oversaw the Nazi concentration camp system.
Here is an example of the result of being "trained" at Dachau: SS guards assigned to the notorious concentration camp Mauthausen. After four months we have no idea where the Benghazi witnesses are. Are they being likewise 'trained"? The longer we wait and be timid about shouting for the answers the American people deserve and to which they have every right, the more difficult it will be to stop whatever is happening to the witnesses, for certainly, something must be happening; people do not exist in a literal state of limbo, their friends and families silenced as surely as they have been.
For more about Dachau, though the information is everywhere, you might be interested in this BRIEF HISTORY.
When Goebbels fell out of favor with Hitler for a while, this was the result: removed from photographs - removed by people working for Hitler, and a comparison could be drawn to whoever did the airbrushing to people like Chris Matthews who in my opinion is a perfect example of what Goebbels himself advocated: self-censorship on the part of the media for the good of the Fatherland. Photos courtesy Dartmouth Edu & used via the Fair Use Act.
"It's impossible" is the refrain when witnesses vanish because people refuse to suffer the emotional pain of disappointment today to save themselves and their country from annihilation tomorrow.
... murdering 40 million of his own people for purely political purposes, two of whom lie dead here in the frozen snow - a mother and her young son. I will spare the reader the displeasure of photographs of Communist Stalin's atrocities so vast they make Hitler's murders of the Jews look like a mere admonishment for wrongdoing.
History sees the same pattern in the beginning of Stalin's rein of terror as Hitler and now Obama: Lies about the causes of deaths of politicians - and ambassador's - are discovered, media controlled by willing accomplices censor themselves to gain favor with the tyrant and information re-created to suit the desires of the Government.
And witnesses to Stalin's crimes vanished, just as surely as the Benghazi victims cannot be identified or found, though all agree they do - or did - exist. The people under Stalin were just as aware and awake as you are reading this now. They were not uneducated. They were talented, well-versed, often highly sophisticated who were well-read in the classics, could quote without effort the great philosophers and excelled in all the arts. They worshiped God publicly before Christian references were outlawed in public. They listened to media commentators praise Stalin for his leadership and mock the "crazy people" who made claims so awful that they could not possibly be true to a reasonable mind. They were not barbarians. They lived in an enlightened, technological age in which no well-meaning citizen needed a gun because Caesars were impossible. They loved and wrote, played and performed, engaged in style and fashion, worked and thrived and laughed at the town criers without checking the facts of their presumed political absurdities. And the streets eventually ran deep in their own blood.
You can read an interesting little thing along these lines at the New York Times, HERE
Communist China's Chairman Mao: the same pattern. Witnesses to atrocities vanish, guns taken from people who collectively believe their world is too sophisticated for Caesars and trust the media which voluntarily censors itself to gain favor with the tyrant and the image the media painted of the benign, handsome, loving and well-meaning leader. The photographs of the many thousands of human heads of Mao's victims - the political opposition - stacked in giant piles are too horrifying and nauseating to even begin to contemplate publishing here.
Cuba's murderous Castro in 1968; guns taken from people, media complicit - fawning over the handsome, loving leader of all good people - and censoring itself before being taken over by the tyrant they tried to please, murders millions of the political opposition, and as seen here, witnesses are made to disappear, and as always, their families also said nothing when they vanished.
This could go on forever. The pattern of Obama's political activity is clear. But the fact that there are Benghazi witnesses who have vanished means we can stop this madness legally right now; we can, though the GOP House, demand all information on the witnesses who must then be medically/psychologically evaluated and made sure to be who it is claimed they are. This is not fun and games anymore. If Obama's pattern - now including the hiding of witnesses to an atrocity - are half of what it seems, then we must demand action - and make sure we get it - to simply save ourselves. That means we have to do what most other citizens in times past failed to do: we must motivate frightened and feckless politicians to show courage they do not possess by instinct. Warn them in the most severe possible terms of political loss in 2014 - and put meat into the threat by openly, loudly and immediately calling for tea party recruits to challenge them in the 2014 primaries. This is all we have left. If we fail, we risk living - or worse - under another Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Castro.
"Over the top"? Ask all those who also mocked the "crazy person" who warned of horrific dangers because in their enlightened age, Caesars were impossible; history books are full of pictures of their stiff, naked corpses piled high by the millions.
FIND THE BENGHAZI WITNESSES and be sure they have not been 'conditioned" and are who they say they are. The time for good manners is over. The pattern is clear and absolutely irrefutable with the advent of the missing/hidden Benghazi witnesses: From any historical perspective whatsoever, this is past a series of coincidences being a reasonable explanation; this country appears to be on the verge of the worst crisis in its history. But it can still be stopped.
AT READER REQUEST, PRIOR BENGHAZI-TRUTH DAILY MEMOS NOW HAVE THEIR OWN REPOSITORY SITE, THE "DAILY MEMO FILE CABINET" .C
****************************
SCROLL DOWN FOR THE NAMES AND CONTACT INFO FOR ALL THE REAL GOP HOUSE HAWKS REGARDING BENGHAZI
****************************
BESIDES TEA PARTY FIRE ANT
TWITTER SWARMS EVERY NIGHT
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
CONTACT GOP LAWMAKERS AND DEMAND BENGHAZI COVER-UP HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS
MANY IN THE GOP-CONTROLLED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ARE HAWKS ON
BENGHAZI AND MEAN REAL BUSINESS!
Here are a few of the more outspoken GOP House Reps. CONTACT THEM! THE HAWKS ARE THE KEY TO THE GOP SELECT COMMITTEE, and the select committee is the key to the open hearings and investigations and the hearings.
DON'T WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO CALL AND E-MAIL AND TWEET THEM FOR YOU! THEY WON'T REACH OUT AND BITE YOU! YOU CAN CALL REP/HAWKS WHO ARE NOT IN YOUR DISTRICT! THIS IS A NATIONAL LEADERSHIP CRISIS! YOU HAVE A RIGHT MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD TO ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!
GOP HOUSE
GOP REP JASON CHAFFETZ
Washington office
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-7751
Fax: (202) 225-5629
Provo Office
51 S University Ave., Suite 318 Provo, UT 84601
Phone: (801) 851-2500
Fax: (801) 851-2509
Twitter: @jasoninthehouse
GOP REP JOE HECK
8485 W. Sunset Road, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Phone: (702) 387-4941
Fax: (702) 837-0728
JAMES LANKFORD
GOP HOUSE, another Hawk
who is NOT PLEASED with Benghazi.
Washington
509 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2132
Fax: (202) 26-1463
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City1015 N. Broadway Avenue,
Suite 310 Oklahoma City, OK 73102
Phone: (405) 234-9900
Fax: (405) 234-9909
Twitter:@RepLankford
GOP REP PETER KING
REP PETER KING has been VERY strong on
calling for a select committee and other
investigations on Benghazi. CONTACT HIM!
E-mail included! Tell him you support his
efforts on Benghazi 100%!
Email:Pete.King@mail.house.gov
Washington Office
339 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: 202-225-7896
Fax: 202-226-2279
Massapequa Park
1003 Park Boulevard Massapequa Park, NY 11762
Phone: 516-541-4225
Fax: 516-541-6602
Twitter: @RepPeteKing
GOP REP FRANK WOLF
GOP REP FRANK WOLF SENT A LETTER TO SPEAKER
BOEHNER DEMANDING A HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE.
The demand is under consideration. Contact Rep Wolf
and TELL HIM YOU SUPPORT HIS ACTIONS!
Washington Office
241 Cannon Building Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5136
(202) 225-0437 fax
Herndon Office
13873 Park Center Rd Ste.130 Herndon, VA 20171
(703) 709-5800 or (800) 945-9653 in state
Twitter @RepWOLFPress
GOP HOUSE investigation chairman DARRELL ISSA
whistle-blowers who can't take the lies coming out
of the State Department and out of the White House."
Call his office and tell them you want answers!
THE INVESTIGATION BOSS! GOP HOUSE
investigation chairman DARRELL ISSA!
Washington DC
2347 Rayburn House Office Building • Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-3906
Fax: 202-225-3303
California District Office
1800 Thibodo Road, #310 • Vista, CA 92081
Phone: 760-599-5000
Fax: 760-599-1178
Twitter: @DarrellIssa
GOP REP TREY GOWDY
Call his offices and tell them you admire his dedication to Benghazi
and that you expect congressional hearings!
Washington, DC
1237 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6030
Fax: (202) 226-1177
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00 AM-5:00 PM Eastern time
South Carolina 4th District
gowdy.house.govGreenville104 South Main St.
Greenville, SC 29601
Phone: (864) 241-0175
Fax: (864) 241-0982
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00 AM-5:00 PM
Contact via internet:
https://gowdy.house.gov/forms/writeyourrep/default.aspx
Twitter: @TGowdySC
GOP REP LOUIS GOHMERT
Call him and express your admiration for him and
that you expect him to get to the bottom of the Benghazi
cover-up!
2440 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 T (202) 225-3035 F (202) 226-1230 TX Toll Free (866) 535-6302
Twitter: @replouiegohmert
GOP SENATE
GOP SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM
Washington Office
290 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-5972
Upstate Regional Office
130 South Main Street, 7th Floor
Greenville, SC 29601
Main: (864) 250-1417
Twitter @GrahamBlog
SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN
241 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Main: (202) 224-2235
Fax: (202) 228-2862
Phoenix Office:
2201 East Camelback Road Suite 115 Phoenix, AZ 85016
Main: (602) 952-2410
Fax: (602) 952-8702
Twitter @SenJohnMcCain
SENATOR KELLY AYOTTE
144 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-3324
Fax: 202-224-4952
Fax: 202-224-4952
Manchester Office
1200 Elm Street, Suite 2
Manchester, NH 03101-2503Phone: 603-622-7979
Fax: 603-622-0422
Twitter: @KellyAyotte
SENATOR RICHARD BURR (Senate intelligence committee)
Washington, DC
217 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-3154
Fax: (202) 228-2981
Twitter: @SenatorBurr
SENATOR DAN COATS
Washington Office United States Senate
493 Russell Office Bldg Washington, DC, 20510
P: (202) 224-5623
F: (202) 228-1820
Twitter: @DanCoats
SENATOR ROY BLUNT,
a true friend of conservatives! He's all over all of it!
Washington
260 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5721
Fax: (202) 224-8149
Twitter: @RoyBlunt
THIS LIST WILL GROW. CONTACT THEM TODAY!
WHAT TO ASK THEM FOR!
1. GOP HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE.
2. OPEN HEARINGS WITH CLINTON AND EVEN, YES, OBAMA. SUBPOENA IF NECESSARY, IMPEACH IF REFUSES (House of Representatives, controlled by the Republicans, has full impeachment authority and does not need the Senate).
3. WHITE HOUSE SURVEILLANCE VIDEO of the halls in the White House, PARTICULARLY OUTSIDE OF THE STRATEGY ROOM, SO WE KNOW WHO WAS WHERE AND WHEN DURING THE 7 HOURS WHEN OUR PEOPLE CALLED FOR HELP and were ultimately murdered by terrorists in BENGHAZI while Obama failed/refused to give them assistance to save their lives.
4. SOME PEOPLE WERE SAVED - EVENTUALLY (IN PART BY A SOLDIER WHO DISOBEYED STAND DOWN ORDERS AND SAVED THEM BEFORE HE, HIMSELF, WAS KILLED IN SO DOING). We need the survivors to testify in open Select Committee hearings.
5. ALL TAPES OF THE CALLS FOR HELP, THE ATTACK, ETC NEED TO BE SEEN AND AIRED IN OPEN SELECT COMMITTEE HEARINGS.
6. ALL SOLDIERS WHO WERE WITH OUR SOLDIERS who were later killed trying to save the people in Benghazi must testify in open hearings as to what they saw and heard that night regarding Obama Administration denials for assistance.
6. ALL HEARINGS NEED TO BE TELEVISED LIVE FROM GAVEL-TO-GAVEL FOR EVERY U.S. CITIZEN TO SEE.
CO-ORDINATE AND WORK TOGETHER TO CONTACT THE GOP HOUSE, GOP SENATE AND GET THE WORD OUT TO THE MAINSTREAM. USE THE MESSAGE BOARD BELOW IF YOU LIKE. WE NEED TO WORK AT THIS EVERY DAY.
This list is intended to allow you to copy, then paste, multiple Representatives into a single tweet. They are NOT linked and do not need to be, twitter does it automatically. Republicans ONLY.
*******************************************************************
….
The beauty of twitter is that unlike when contacting a Rep by phone or e-mail, they do not know what area of the country you hail from and therefore cannot just write off your concerns because you are not in their state! With a short message like BOEHNER MUST GO!you can probably tweet four or five at a time.
@RepJoBonner @RepMarthaRoby @RepMikeRogersAL @Robert_Aderholt @RepMoBrooks @BachusAL06 @repdonyoung @RepGosar @RepTrentFranks @benquayle @RepDavid @JeffFlake @RepRickCrawford @RepTimGriffin @rep_stevewomack @RepDanLungren @RepMcClintock @RepJeffDenham @eltongallegly24 @BuckMcKeon @DevinNunes @GOPWhip @RepEdRoyce @RepJerryLewis @RepGaryMiller @KenCalvert @MaryBonoMack @DanaRohrabacher @RepJohnCampbell @DarrellIssa @BilbrayCA50 @RepTipton @repcorygardner @RepDLamborn @RepDLamborn @Rep_Southerland @AnderCrenshaw @RepRichNugent @RepCliffStearns @micaforcongress @RepWebster @Bilirakis @RepDennisRoss @VernBuchanan @RepConnieMack @congbillposey @TomRooney @RosLehtinen @MarioDB @AllenWest @RepSandyAdams @RepRivera @JackKingston @RepWestmoreland @RepTomPrice @AustinScottGA08 @RepTomGraves @RepPaulBrounMD @RepPhilGingrey @Raul_Labrador @CongMikeSimpson @PeterRoskam @RepJoeWalsh @RepDold @RepKinzinger @JudyBiggert @RepHultgren @RepTimJohnson @donmanzullo @RepSchilling @repaaronschock @RepShimkus @RepStutzman @ToddRokita @RepDanBurton @RepMikePence @RepLarryBucshon @RepToddYoung @TomLatham @CongHuelskamp @RepLynnJenkins @RepKevinYoder @RepMikePompeo @RepEdWhitfield @RepGuthrie @RepHalRogers @repjefflandry @RepFleming @USRepAlexander @BillCassidy @RepBoustany @Harris4Congress @Roscoe_Bartlett @CongressmanDan @RepHuizenga @repjustinamash @RepDaveCamp @RepFredUpton @RepWalberg @RepMikeRogers @CandiceMiller @repjohnkline @RepErikPaulsen @MicheleBachmann @RepChipCravaack @RepAlanNunnelee @GreggHarper @CongPalazzo @RepToddAkin @VickyHartzler @SmallBizGOP @auctnr1 @JoAnnEmerson @DennyRehberg @JeffFortenberry @LeeTerry2012 @RepAdrianSmith @AmodeiNevada @RepJoeHeck @RepFrankGuinta @RepCharlesBass @RepLoBiondo @RepJonRunyan @RepLanceNJ7 @RodneyforNJ @RepStevePearce @RepPeteKing @RepNanHayworth @RepChrisGibson @RepRichardHanna @RepBuerkle @RepTomReed @RepReneeEllmers @RepWalterJones @RepVirginiaFoxx @SueMyrick @PatrickMcHenry @RepRickBerg @RepSteveChabot @RepMikeTurner @Jim_Jordan @boblatta @RepBillJohnson @SteveAustria @TiberiPress @SteveLaTourette @RepSteveStivers @RepJimRenacci @RepBobGibbs @USRepSullivan @tomcoleok04 @RepLankford @repgregwalden @MikeKellyforPA3 @CongressmanGT @JimGerlach @RepMeehan @RepFitzpatrick @RepBillShuster @RepTomMarino @RepLouBarletta @RepTimScott @CongJoeWilson @RepJeffDuncan @TGowdySC @RepMickMulvaney @RepKristiNoem @DrPhilRoe @RepChuck @DesJarlaisTN04 @RepDianeBlack @MarshaBlackburn @RepFincherTN08 @replouiegohmert @JudgeTedPoe @SamsPressShop @RepHensarling @RepJoeBarton @CongCulberson @RepKevinBrady @McCaulPressShop @ConawayTX11 @RepKayGranger @MacTXPress @RepRonPaul @RepBillFlores @RandyNeugebauer @TX20CharlieG @LamarSmithTX21 @PeteOlson @RepCanseco @RepKenMarchant @michaelcburgess @farenthold @RepJohnCarter @PeteSessions @jasoninthehouse @RobWittman @RepScottRigell @Randy_Forbes @RepRobertHurt @RepGoodlatte @EricCantor @RepMGriffith @RepWOLFPress @HerreraBeutler @DocHastings @cathymcmorris @davereichert @RepMcKinley @RepShelley @RepPaulRyan @JimPressOffice @RepSeanDuffy @RepRibble @CynthiaLummis
- oh, and of course @SpeakerBoehner
COMMENTS, BELOW, ARE CLOSED DUE TO FOUL-MOUTH LIBERAL TROLLS, SEEMINGLY FROM READERS OF NEWSWEEK AND SALON. SORRY, BUT AS USUAL, IT'S THE PARTY-MINDED LIBERALS WHO HAVE SPOILED THE PARTY !
