Saturday, August 8, 2015


All art and screenshots not original to this blog used via the Fair Use Act.


Well, we told you it would happen: Fox is back at it, attacking Trump.

To take the he said / she said out of it, recall that Fox struck at Trump first with a series of questions which were patently designed to take down the GOP front-runner, while handing Jeb Bush, in particular, softball questions. Their biases and prejudices were clear and well-understood by an enraged Republican audience which made its collective fury known all over the internet. 

The problem for Fox, from a business  standpoint,  is that Trump leads all GOP candidates more than 2-to-one, now, so Fox basically spat in the eye of its own audience, which was the motivation for this boycott, which from this past Thursday and Friday's Neilson ratings numbers, may indeed be catching on.

Thursday and Friday saw Fox on a precipitous  decline with Friday's ratings numbers being the worst Fox has seen in ages.

Before the TPFA-organized Fox News Turn Right boycott 2 years ago, Fox was posting ratings about 15% - 20% higher than they have remained, more or less, ever since.

On average, the numbers have averaged at 

O'Reilly 2.5 

Kelly 2.3

Hannity 1.5 

They got a huge boost from the debate, and a bump from the skirmish thereafter. When we last reported, the boycott seemed to have been a wash. Addressing numbers only up to Wednesday of last week, we did not count on a delayed/roll-on effect. Certainly the idea of a boycott was picked up all over Twitter. 

Now look at Thursday's numbers:

O'Reilly 2.3

Kelly 2.1

Hannity (rises) 1.6

The arrow appears to be pointing down not from the debate, but from their 12-month average. It's a huge fall so soon after the debate, where O'Reilly was getting well over 3.2 and Kelly close behind

Now for the one that shocked even us. Look at Friday:

O'Reilly 1.9

Kelly 1.6

and the proof that the boycott is probably responsible is that most people on Twitter said they would remain loyal to conservative Hannity while turning off RINOs O'Reilly and Kelly, Hannity remains identical at his normal average of 1.5  

Hannity 1.5

So tuning into Hannity and turning off O'Reilly and Kelly appears to be exactly what is happening.

We think the boycott may be kicking in (we'll keep you apprised), and good for you for standing your ground and breaking old habits to teach Fox a lesson: don't piss off the audience that makes you rich. 

Now, Fox gets nasty again, believe it or not.

When asked in other interviews about Kelly, Trump answered other interviews honestly about his feelings for Fox's Megyn kelly's extremely abrubt announcement of her virtually immediate vacation, feeling that seething audience antipathy to Kelly everywhere on the internet perhaps in some way precipitated Kelly's "vacation". This is an absolutely logical and reasonable speculation to make. But because of that, backstabbing and ungracious Fox News is back at attacking the presidential front-runner that Fox's own audience favors, and doing it with, in our opinion, the kind of hateful, dismissive and poisonous tone that  Megan  Kelly manifest that so angered Trump supporters in the first place.

So, heedless of any programming common sense, Fox is blasting away at Trump with a preposterous lack of grace and decorum - really, just coming across, IMO, like a very large and well-financed internet troll. They have basically reduced themselves to that level. That is not how you please your audience that by a huge margins adores Trump and hates the attacks.

When Fox CEO Roger Ailes told Newsweek in September of 2011 that he was taking Fox away from the core conservatives and making it more mainstream, he tacitly admitted that Fox skews the news according to the audience they wish to grab - there is no other way to interpret what Ailes said. That, then, proves that Fox is not "Fair and balanced", nor does it really make it objective journalism any more than CNN or MSNBC. Without perhaps realizing it, Ailes admitted that Fox News was nothing more than entertainment, arranged to play for a certain audience. It is the job of entertainers please the audience. This is not a revelation 15 years into the new millennium. And when an entertainer or entertainment company enrages its own audience with a seeming purpose, then that entertainment company plainly has an agenda. The agenda appears to anoint hopeless loser Jeb Bush and somehow try to damage Donald Trump whose polls continue to leave his closest rivals in the double-digit dust and the rest already-forgotten in the single digits. This makes Fox as much the mainstream media as CNN or MBC or ABC or any other left-wing outfit, all of whom are trying in vain to damage Trump while his voter poll numbers show that he has broken through the  stratosphere and is now leaving all competition behind. The way Fox is behaving, it looks like Fox's audience is going with Trump and leaving Fox in the single-digits, too, along with the candidates Fox appears to favor.

Fox and all the of the media seem to have forgotten that Republican voters now have the internet. Fox and the mainstream media also seem to have forgotten that Republican voters  generally poll as above-average in education and intelligence and if forced to choose between TV networks hostile to their opinions or the man who they are very firmly convinced is the best candidate to fix America, they are going with the latter; they are sticking with Trump.

Need we say it? Boycott Fox until Fox decides to wake up and smell the coffee.



well, you can't be 100% all the time and..... it isn't our fault.

If you were watching TPFA-friendly accounts on Twitter, you likely saw dozens of Tweets with retweet numbers just like this. Some of these people have tens of thousands and some even have hundreds of thousands of followers, almost all Conservatives. That means hundreds of thousands of Conservatives got the message. Hundreds of thousands at least. Add others with large followings, picking up on the idea with their own original boycott art, and make that certainly millions.

Unlike the Fox News Boycott from 2 years ago, this one is a wash. Indeed, Fox ratings' numbers are slightly up this week!

Gleeful, malicious dorks sadistically high-five-ing this particular instance of a lack of Fox News boycott success will blame us and an imaginary perception that this group is not effective. (liberals love a Fox News whose CEO promised Newsweek in 2011 that he was taking Fox to the left, that mocks birthers, bashes Trump and never asks where the missing Benghazi survivors are) Well, we'll put up here for new readers a few screenshots to show if this blog and group is effective or not. But there is the problem and the problem lies not with us. The problem, and I mean this, lies with Conservative Fox news viewers who, when given the choice, watched Fox anyway instead of turning it off, as they did two years ago. 

Many people with staggering follower numbers - over 100,000 and more -  picked up on this boycott, creating their own art and Tweeting like mad and still the majority of Fox News viewers tuned in. 

How does one reconcile this with the fact that almost every U.S. conservative frets endlessly about the fact that Fox News has gone too far to the left? The seeming fact is IMO, that with such a scandalous eye-candy feud between Fox and Trump, conservatives did not show the self-discipline to turn off Fox, and wound up rewarding Fox News, literally, for bashing Trump, because you just put extra advertising dollars in Fox's bank account by tuning in. 

There was plethora of advertising for the boycott in the form of people retweeting to hundreds of thousands of people. Everyone is furious at Megan Kelly. But conservatives tuned in anyway, IMO, because the basic, short-thinking instinct to watch a delicious scandal overrode the responsibility to help their nation. To help the Nation, people must make Fox turn back to the right in it's content and presentation approach, and that only happens when they send Fox a message by turning Fox off during an organized boycott.

Whose fault is the lack of boycott success? Not ours. Not the people who retweeted. The fault lies with literally every conservative this week who heard about the boycott, agreed with the need for Fox to turn right, and watched Fox anyway. If that is you, blame yourself, and don't come whining to us the next time Fox bashes a birther, attacks Trump (they will again, you know it), ignores Obama's forgeries and lawbreaking, shows it could not care less about the missing Benghazi witnesses or anything else. We organized the boycott, many patriots online with huge follow numbers got the word out and you people rewarded Fox anyway by turning in and telling Fox that destroying conservatives is the best way for Fox to make more money.

Shrug. We did our part. If a RINO news network is what you want, then keep watching Fox in its present form and a RINO news network is what you are going to get. Forever. And all the bitching won't help if you are bitching and turning in to Fox at the same time.

File this under "Y" for the "You can lead a horse to water" department. 

Since trolls will try to diminish this blog and group while pretending to be conservative and saying this blog and group are somehow generally ineffective (while the attackers demonstrate no accomplishment of their own), let's take a short walk down memory lane. Once again, don't blame us for organizing a boycott which went nowhere this time around. Blame the people who bitch and whine about Fox News not being conservative enough and tuned in to Fox during the boycott, anyway.




"Curiouser and curiouser", said Alice, redux.
You may remember our last Fox news Boycott, two years ago, that made mainstream media everywhere. Here we go again, but this time the need for a Fox News Boycott is more pressing than ever.


Firstly, in the interest of disclosure, this group and blog officially supports Donald Trump for President whole-heartedly. However, that does not change the objective reality that a news organization like Fox that claims to favor the Republicans as an audience should obviously not try to undermine in a debate the candidate who, in polls, has been favored overwhelmingly by that very same audience. That is called spitting in the eye of the people who pay your bills and salaries. That is called grossly unprofessional - even horrendously unethical, IMO - media misconduct. And for that, Fox needs a good, hard spanking until their ratings are red and sore for a month.

Remember, ratings equal how much Fox can charge advertisers to run their commercials on Fox. As Fox ratings slip, so, too, do their profits, and that is what boycotts are all about: for an audience or consumer group to refuse to give money to a company until the company does what they want the company to do. That - and this - are the very definition of a legal boycott. And our last boycotts hit Fox hard, to an astonishing overall 22% ratings drop  and if you recall, we proved it to you with links to industry-standard rating reports and percentage calculators ( a minor detail the mainstream media accidentally overlooked as a couple of them tried to make the ridiculous case that there was no cause and effect between the boycott demanding Fox turn right and the drop in ratings numbers, obviously hoping that you, the conservative viewer, would never wake up and realize you have real power as to how the news is reported). 

Remember this from 2 years ago?


Look at the facts: in 2011, Fox bigwig Roger Ailes told Newsweek he was taking Fox to the "lucrative political center". If you are on the right and move to the center, it means, literally, you are going to the left. Obviously.  Now that's gross on two levels.... 

1. It means that Fox is skewing how they report the news to fit a certain audience desire and that is not news, that is called 'entertainment". Most news agencies also do that, but nevertheless it is, in its worst form, called Propaganda and nations have fallen because of the type of shenanigans Fox is pulling.

2. It means that using money as an excuse, Ailes  and Fox the Corporation are, IMO, once again totally stabbing in the back the millions of desperate conservatives who need their voice to be heard. This is true betrayal, IMO, in the worst possible form. It's disgusting. It reeks of, IMO, a personality so seared of conscience that it would walk on the faces of those who made him and his organization wealthy and hear their awful cries of audience desperation, in the manner of a sadist, as a happy song. At best it is cold-blooded indifference. Either way, it's disgusting beyond words.

Some obvious past betrayal by Fox of its own audience;

1. Handling Benghazi, otherwise known as Watergate to the tenth power on steroids, as a casual subject. Fox got somewhat with the program after our first Boycott, suddenly racing to do 'Specials". Those specials included talking to the co-authors of the Book 13 Hours, about Benghazi, written by a rabid liberal with the 3 co-writers who were on the ground at the Benghazi annex - the only three apparently allowed by Obama to speak - with Fox News giving those witnesses particular credibility even though their conclusion was that Obama and Hillary did nothing wrong regarding Benghazi. What about the other 30 witnesses who have mysteriously remained silent after 2 1/2 years, also remaining unidentified to Congress by the Obama administration?  It is obvious that Fox seems quite pleased with the mystery and silence of the 30 Benghazi witnesses  and it seems as though silenced is how Fox News feels they should remain, because Fox has done not one thing on the issue of the silenced witnesses, including asking in a substantive way what happened to 30 American witnesses whose testimony could bring down a sitting, communist-raised, anti-American President.

2. The Birthers appear to be correct: law enforcement has determined without a doubt that Obama's birth certificate is a fake - and a felony. No question. A felony. Absolutely. For sure. Does Fox give the chief law enforcement investigator, with the third-largest constituency of its kind in America - over 5 million people - and 50 years law enforcement experience, who also himself worked as a federal agent for 30 years, Joe Arpio, who has a law enforcement staff of approximately twice the number of employees at Fox News - 3,500 law enforcement specialists - and who used to be called "America's Sheriff" by Fox itself, even two minutes to even tell the facts of Obama's criminal forgery to the public? No. Fox anchors instead, seeming almost to a one, go off on screeds defaming the "birthers" and in so doing once again spit in the eyes of the audience that made Fox successful in the first place. Horrible, disgusting behavior by ingrate Fox. Absolutely, 100% off-the-chart awful.

3. Sean Hannity is probably the only true conservative Fox has ever had in its prime time lineup (and even he is pretty squishy on any issue that could inflict any actual political or legal damage to the Obama Presidency, such as ignoring the missing Benghazi Witnesses, Obama's felony forgery, HRes36, HRes422 and HRes198, all of which he has ignored for years). So what does Fox do? Despite strong ratings (and profit, which they claim is their reason for moving left) they move Hannity to a time closer to the Witching Hour, 10:00 PM EST, and put in his 9 PM EST slot Megyn Kelly, who has in our opinion, proven time and again that she has little in common with her Fox News audience, who often admit that they only tune in to Fox because they have nowhere on TV to turn. 

That desperation from the audience, in-turn, has apparently resulted in an unconscionable take-them-for-granted attitude by Fox toward its own audience, and is well represented by this Twitter exchange with Fox News reporter James Rosen 2 years ago. Several Tea Party Fire Ant patriots were warning Fox of another boycott if they continued to betray its core audience. Rosen responds, in essence, "If we go away because of your boycott, you will have no one to love you." IMO, Rosen's message amounts to the kind of words you expect from a cruel, pathological manipulator, and represents, ultimately, it seems, all of the Fox News Corporation's obvious thinking from the top down.

Now Fox tries to sandbag Donald Trump, the double-digit, hands-down favorite in every poll among the audience that pays Fox News' bills via their viewership, with a hatchet job which, thankfully, Trump was able to seemingly effortlessly  knock down with each cheap, drive-by attack Fox apparently believed it could sell to the viewers as being in the service of the public good. 

Enough. The time has come, once again. BOYCOTT FOX NEWS AND SPREAD THE WORD EVERYWHERE! And remember: do not tune in to Fox to "See how the boycott is going." that defeats the whole purpose. Turn their prime-time lineup off. Clear off. All the way, for 4 days.WE WILL KEEP YOU APPRISED HERE OF HOW THE BOYCOTT IS GOING THE MOMENT THE RATINGS NUMBERS ARE AVAILABLE, probably two-to-three days after the boycott begins. 

Make a difference, once again. Fox needs to re-learn the lesson from 2 years ago it has obviously forgotten. Send a signal to cruel, arrogant and manipulative Fox News decision-makers: "We're mad as hell and we aren't going to take it, anymore." 


Sunday, August 2, 2015


All Quotes and images used via the Fair Use Act

Update: It's great to be acknowledged by the next President Of The United States! Also, continued thanks to the growing number of patriots who liked and retweeted next-POTUS Trump's Twitter MT!

Update: For 15 hours we allowed the issue of Ted Cruz's eligibility issue to take too strong a place in this memo. Yes, we have the conclusive evidence that Cruz is not eligible, but have moved it to the bottom of this post, beneath our support for Donald Trump for President, where it belongs.

Back to the memo.....


Regular readers know we don't make sour predictions.  We have a terrific investigation, activist and prediction record. Way, way up at the top. Indeed, we help make the news, as you know from our Benghazi Select Committee and HRes 422 (to sue Obama) campaigns: they  got huge, effusive praise from the Representatives who authored the bills. When we boycotted Fox News to move back to the right, viewership at Fox dropped 22%. As you know, we proved it with published rating numbers and a degree of detail and specificity you never find anywhere else, including two online percentage calculators so you could see the absolute proof for yourselves.  When I publicly, on Twitter, challenged Newsweek's David Freedlander to prove why he said in a Newsweek article about us that our boycott had little impact, promising him a retraction if he could explain his evidence which countered ours, he made a series of smarmy exchanges and then ultimately blocked my account - without ever answering the question. (that boycott made news in just about every mainstream online outlet there is, including significant video reports)

Media is my business and we have only ever gotten one prediction wrong, ever, out of dozens due to momentary lapse in judgement born of hopeful optimism: in tat instance, we just didn't think any burgeoning news outfit could be, frankly, in our opinion, so completely and shamelessly full of it. No one is 100% all the time.

Ours is a terrific record- we challenge anyone to prove otherwise (are you listening, David Freedlander?) So listen up  We know what we're talking about.

The media is freaking out in blind terror at Donald Trump, who is every liberal's worst nightmare, because he takes on the liberals and GOP establishment like a bunker buster, and like Reagan before him, there seems  to be no way to stop his skyrocketing popularity. 

Trump represents - indeed is - what the liberal elite though they had locked out of the White House for all time: another Ronald Reagan. Only this Reagan is on media steroids and is wearing NYC-made brass knuckles under his boxing gloves. No self-conscious warrior,  he. While Reagan would settle for a technical knock-out, Trump is exhibiting the same behavior that made him essentially the biggest player in the toughest city on earth: leaving his opponents unconscious and in critical condition on the mat. And that is what republican voters want. They are sick and tired of being derided by the media, mocked by Obama, and utterly betrayed by tearful GOP House Speaker Boehner whose eyes glisten with love at Obama. 

The GOP voters are also sick of a timid GOP Congress afraid to throw Boehner out on his ear as he so truly deserves. GOP voters want a fighter. Now, at long last, they have a fighter.  They have Donald Trump, who is a true political heat-seeking missile: precise, relentlessly on-target and devastating upon impact.He's also a RELIABLE fighter because the fight is enthusiastically in his blood, not something he needs to muster.

If Trump displayed similar fighting acumen for the leftist cause, the media would fall on its collective knees and laud him as positively Aristotelian in his empirical, common-sense arguments.
Trump is the twenty-first century moment when Reagan said, angrily, "I paid for that microphone!" Only one choice in this election does not say "manufactured In China" on it's base, and that's Donald Trump.

Sure, there are  differences between Reagan and Trump. But Trump, in our judgement, and at the risk of committing a conservative political sin, comes out way ahead in the comparisons between he and the pre-presidency Reagan at the time Reagan first ran for President:

They say Trump, unlike Reagan or others, has never governed or presided over an economy. But being nn essentially self-made billionaire, his personal worth at $10 billion is larger than the GDP of most nations.  And he made that money using the same prowess so desperately  needed in our next President: an ability to make hard choices which turn into good news. Most politicians lack the skill to operate successfully with reality-based solutions. By being bold and gigantically talented in the area of decision-making, Trump has credentials that no other candidate can touch where it matters to being President: making smart  executive decisions in an imperfect world. 

While Reagan and Trump were both involved in show business, Reagan was an actor. Trump's much more current TV popularity is due to a different quality, one which lies right at the heart of the US Presidency. Trump's wildly popular "Apprentice" is a reality TV show predicated on one talent: that of executive decision-maker. The President of the United States is the chief executive decision maker of this nation. That's not my opinion - that is the job title description! No other candidate can hold a candle to Trump as a proven decision-maker. 

And Trump is the ultimate non-establishment candidate, and that's perfect. If the current GOP establishment had the Founding Fathers under its thumb, there would plainly be no United States of America today.  

The US is plagued by disasters that Reagan himself could never have imagined: ISIS beheadings; a president who is plainly anti-American and anti-Christian; Mexican drug cartels murdering willy-nilly; harvesting of baby body parts while liberals who advocate such a thing try to paint a sweet bunny face on a ghoul. Not to mention an economy so wrecked by Obama that it positively dwarfs the "malaise' that arrogant and pedantic Jimmy Carter whined about. The usual politicians won't cut it.

Trump also has an astonishing skill which makes politicians look tight, wooden, and therefore only partially competent: he speaks without a teleprompter or prepared speech. Leftist and center media, terrified of Trump, have tried to paint his speeches as "rambling". They are not rambling. They are merely unstructured, and that is a huge, huge difference. Trump holds his audience with a tight grip, and that because he is unafraid to speak truths so desperately needed to be spoken. Rambling speeches to not get wildly enthusiastic responses, as Trump's do. Rambling speeches to not result in positively soaring poll numbers, as have been shown by Trump. Rambling speeches do not get you to the top of a business in a city where a middle finger is regarded with respect as an honest display of opinion. And rambling speeches do not make you the number one television draw for over 10 consecutive years. Once again, the media is lying because that's all they can do to try to stop Trump's popularity. The facts, you see, side with him.

In less than a week from this writing, Trump will have his first debate. And while Trump would never need my advice,  I offer it here, and you can call it a prediction, if you want, because we're good at that, and these 'suggestion/predictions", in the manner of kicking false modesty down the stairwell, come from a blog that gets it right. 

Here are scripted responses, which are this blog's prediction to what will be close to what Trump says if the opportunities arise, as he might phrase them. We hope so, anyway. As the red meat gets the thunderous ovations, it will put Democrat strategists into a tailspin in this uncertain new landscape, and in such situations, democrats, already phony to the gills, will be certain to put out mistake after awkward mistake, like the Bill and Hillary ad about Hillarycare which was perhaps the worst political media message in the history of the art. It's always good to have an opponent used to being on top who suddenly who cannot keep his balance, because the falls are a wonder to behold.

TRUMP RESPONSES, in green, predicted and hoped-for.

1. START by saying, 

"First off, I'd like everyone to watch what every expert in politics is anticipating - the other candidates mostly attacking me, because I am leading by double digits in the polls. You can even play at home: count how many times the other candidates attack me instead of touting their accomplishments. Maybe they won't do it, but it will be interesting to see if that's what happens."

This should, in theory, make the opposition too timid to recite many of their well-prepared attack lines lest they prove Trump right - and therefore knowledgeable and even more appealing. If and when they do, say

"Funny how they are not attacking each other. Only me, because they know, as my poll numbers show, that I am the only viable candidate on this stage that the republican voters really want, because I don't just talk, I get things done."

2. MARRIAGES:  Trump should counter anything about his marriages with the comparison to Reagan and say 



"But democrat Bill Clinton has been married as long as you have been, congressman/Mr Moderator, and he lost his law license for perjuring himself while testifying about having sex with a young girl in the most hallowed office in this nation, a lie which cost Bill Clinton his law license for the rest of his life. Long-lasting marriages are nice, but they are no litmus test for what makes a great President, here or anywhere else, congressman/Mr Moderator."

2. ATTACKED FOR BEING A "BIRTHER". Come on full-bore with both barrels blazing and leave no one standing when the smoke clears. 

"Look, the fact that Obama posted a fraudulent birth certificate, which I understand is a felony, by the way, is the biggest non-secret in Washington DC, and the only reason Obama is getting away with it is because every congressman on this stage lacks the guts to say it. (pause for huge, huge applause while the liberal moderators freeze in terror) They all act like timid little mice. Arizona law enforcement has the evidence and has flown to Washington to give the evidence in hard copy form to every congressman on this stage and even then they refuse to do the work the people pay them to do. Why would voters want any one of a bunch of lazy, dull, frightened people to be President? I opened my mouth with no congressional power whatsoever and Obama, feeling the heat, immediately put up a fake birth certificate after spending millions of dollars to avoid the issue. All of the rest of you together on this stage, with all the power of congress you posses, could not even do that. Results like yours are pathetic. Why hire someone like you guys for the job of president if you are totally incompetent as congressmen? And that's what you are. Incompetent. You have let Obama get away with scandal time after time, year after year, because you lack courage and competence. Don't blame me for being a so-called birther. The birthers have been proved to be essentially right. The wrong ones are the media moderating this debate and these congressmen so scared of their own shadows that they are letting  Obama get away with a felony and leaving the mystery behind it unexplained to a frustrated voting public."

If someone says the birth certificate was verified by Hawaii dept of health.

"Have you seen that place? It looks like a cinder block shack in a third-world country. It's in an area of Hawaii that embraced people like Obama's infamous communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis AND YES, A VIDEO FROM THE PAST HAS SURFACED WHICH PROVES FROM OBAMA'S OWN MOUTH THAT DAVIS WAS HIS MENTOR. The only person who handled the original birth certificate, Loretta Fuddy, died in a mysterious plane crash. If I had to choose between the expertise of Arizona law enforcement after a two-year investigation or the friends of Frank Marshall Davis quoting a dead woman who never directly spoke of the authenticity of the document, I am choosing Arizona law enforcement, obviously. Obama's posted birth certificate is a fake, and it's a felony, and Obama must questioned in a select committee about that felony. And these supposedly brave congressmen on this stage who want to be your president don't have the guts to do the most basic job on a politic gift given to them on a silver platter. It's pathetic and it's wrong for the American people who deserve better. It's really disgusting the degree to which these congressmen are so cowardly and irresponsible. I'm serious. It's terrible."

Author: This goes back to something I have said for years: term limits and low salaries are the dumbest things conservatives should demand of congress because they are really only crafting absurdly bad "Help Wanted" ads by telling talent that otherwise commands millions to give it all up so they can get a tiny fraction of their salaries and get savaged by the press. Only losers would apply and for the most part, only losers do. To attract the proper talent we need to pay congressman top money - millions - but contingent on performance, like in the real world, and let them make a career out of that

You know: budget balanced, salary: $1 million per year. $10 billion budget surplus, Salary: $2 million per year. Deficit? Salary: $250,000.00 for that year. You know - like the real world.

Otherwise our laws will continue to be written by harassed loser idiots who don't have a clue how to make it in the real world. My idea/plan - I call it mine because in all the years I have said it, no one has so much as repeated it -  would see congressmen from the right and left fall all over themselves to work together for the good of the nation because they would want the money it would get them. It's as simple as that.  And we would get the laws we want because this nation still skews center-right, and conservative solutions are the ones that lead to the best actual real-world results, for which the congressmen would get paid more. The democrats would come to us for a change, because their self-interest would lie in practical conservative solutions that work, not the failed socialist policies that appeal to certain liberal constituent districts. 

Apply a market-based capitalist solution to how and how much congressmen get paid and we would be done and gone with the Charlie Wrangles and Nancy Pelosis for good because genuine, talented competition, like Trump, would engage the elections as candidates and those current congressional losers and their ilk could never hold a candle in an election to people capable of mature, professional accomplishment.

"My not being a politician is a good thing. At least in this day and age, it is. (to other candidates) Look at all of you. Seriously. I'm sure some of you are good people and all that, but how have you helped the country? How have you helped the Republican party? Obama won a second term. We have Obamacare, which is a terrible blight. It took a dedicated group of online activists (the Tea Party Fire Ants) over a year to get enough of you to co-sponsor a Benghazi select committee or there would not even be that and no hope for justice for the Benghazi slain, murders for which it appears Obama and Hillary we partially very responsible. The economy is a disaster. Those things are why your poll numbers in the republican congress are so low: the democrats bash you out of blind partisanship and the republicans bash you out of frustration because you aren't doing what they want you to do while you take their money. I know. I hear it all the time. Republican voters WANT you to hold impeachment hearings on Obama because he has broken so many laws. Republican voters WANT you to looking into Obama's fake birth certificate and show that you have the courage to stand for something instead of hiding under your desks from the press. I hear it by the thousands everywhere I go.They want you do do anything and everything you can to fix this country now that you have both Houses of congress and do those things and many more and you aren't doing anything except complaining and you guys have the nerve to now run for president. You could have only complained more effectively if you stayed in the congressional minority. Now you have no excuses and you STILL aren't doing anything. And when it comes down to it, what do many of you cite as your big selling point? You try to sell your desirability as a congressman on the fact that you are small business owners! Well, if that is the conclusion, I suggest people  vote for a big business owner who knows how to get things done and forget about the ineffectual, small potatoes who have proven as congressmen that they are not the material needed to be congressmen, let alone President of the United States."


"You see, this is why nobody trusts the press anymore. It used to be people tuned into guys like Cronkite because even though he was liberal, he had the decency to tell the truth. You don't tell the truth. You learned journalism on the knees of lying, socialist teachers in college. You guys lie. The rest of the people up here will go on defense and try to curry your favor and split the difference on your lie and hope you don't beat them up anymore. I can buy and sell jerks like you, wholesale. If I was a mean person I could pull strings and ruin your careers in a heartbeat, or investigate and publish the skeletons you all have in your closets. But I have never done those kinds of things because I believe in being an honest, fair player. But if you think I am going to stand here and listen to unaccomplished jerks like you lie about me and take it the way the others will, then you are living in a dream world. What you just said was a lie and you know it, and if this had been a Grand Jury you'd be in prison for perjury, seriously. Here is the truth to correct the lie you just said and maybe when I am done you should go back to journalism school."
(then correct the lie)


Do not tell how much you have done, and all that. say simply

"That's the dumbest question I have ever heard. How can they trust me to be president? Don't ask me, ask them. I am leading by double digits in all the polls. Seriously. Thank you for the stupid question."


"I have never been called a racist in my life until I started to run for president. Now it's another lie the left uses to stop me. Do I think Obama should be impeached for breaking so many laws? Absolutely, of course,  and it doesn't help me in the election because Obama won't be running. It's about doing what's right. It's about the rule of law. It's about setting a standard of conduct for future Presidents. You impeach a black president the same way you do a white President, and if anyone disagrees with that, then in my opinion THEY are the racists - the anti-white racists, and that includes white liberals who sometimes appear to me as though they despise themselves, like sick mental patients who engage in self-harm. The Klu Klux Klan started among the DEMOCRATS in the south. For decades a KKK clansman OFFICER who was a DEMOCRAT congressmen,  was embraced by people like Obama and Hillary Clinton while the press, like you, never said a word. SENATOR ROBERT BYRD. Did you, mister journalist, ever call out Byrd and rightfully say he was not suited for office, as you should have, because he had been an officer in the klu klux klan, an organization that for decades routinely murdered blacks in the Jim Crow days?  IF RACISTS EXIST, THEY EXIST AMONG THE DEMOCRAT ELITE WHO UNJUSTLY DEFAME THE REPUBLICANS WITH NO EVIDENCE OF RACISM AMONG CURRENT REPUBLICANS WHATSOEVER. And if you find a white Republican  racist you can hold up as exhibit A, be sure to show pictures of Hillary smiling and enjoying the company of KKK officer Robert Byrd, because those pictures exist, so don't pull that racism crap on me, because I will feed it right back to you, which is the proper direction it should be going."

Journalist: Did you just imply that I am a racist?

"No, I implied that you are lying, dishonest journalist, in my opinion, who plays the race card for the advantage of his own political ideology instead of simply reporting the news, which is supposed to be your job, and in my opinion trash like you has no business moderating a serious presidential debate. Go back to your lousy, dishonest socialist kindergarten and allow the American people to make their choices based on what honest, serious, no-nonsense grownups say. Thank you for the question."

In Conclusion

I have followed and admired Trump's honest, brassy, no-nonsense style for years. While I rarely watched The Apprentice (I have seen parts of it perhaps three or four times - I watch TV to ESCAPE watching that kind of thing), I am now nevertheless a fan. This blog concludes that Trump should be the next President not because it is a fan of Trump, but rather this blog is a fan of Trump because it has concluded Trump should be the next President.

We don't know what Reagan would say if Reagan were alive, today. But it seems much too easy to imagine that where he is now, he gets that Irish twinkle in his eye, cracks a rugged smile and gives an approving thumb's up every time Donald Trump hits the campaign stage.


We are already getting anti-Trump flack from Ted Cruz supporters. While we love Cruz as a real conservative fighter,  CRUZ IS NOT ELIGIBLE. For real. So once again it takes this group and blog, the Tea Party Fire Ants and Benghazi-Truth, to lead the national discussion and clarify the facts with irrefutable evidence. You know, we do this too much considering we don't get paid for it. 

Cruz' father did not become a US citizen until 2005. 

In 2008 the US House passed a resolution, S. RES. 511, defining Natural Born Citizen to clarify the issue regarding then-candidate John McCain. This is from the GOV archive itself, so let there be no argument about it:
It specifically cites the applicant must be born to TWO U.S. CITIZENS who were U.S. citizens at the time of the applicant's birth. TRUMP SHOULD SAY THIS, TOO, ACCORDING TO THAT RESOLUTION OBAMA HIMSELF SIGNED, S. RES. 511, OBAMA, HIMSELF, WAS NEVER ELIGIBLE, EITHER! THEREFORE EVERY LAW OBAMA SIGNED IS MOOT ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION. If Trump says that, he will rock the world, and the facts are right here. 

Additionally, while the resolution cites other Presidents not being born on US soil (in fact, the Founding Fathers, actually, who were eligible as citizens at the time the Constitution was written, an exclusion allowed for in-writing in the Constitution, read it yourself), the resolution qualifies McCain because of the fact that the US Panama Canal base on which he was born was regarded as US-owned soil. All of this is in-line with writings of this Nation's Founding Fathers in terms of obvious intent. 

IMPORTANT. Research it: The only time "Natural Born" is known to have existed as a term before or during the writing of the U.S. Constitution is in Emerich de Vattel's 1758  Law Of Nations, a then-contemporary work during the lead-up to the birth of this nation, a writing which was widely quoted by our Founding Fathers, who plainly drew their term "Natural Born Citizen" from Vattel's book. 

Book one chapter 19,
§ 212. Of the citizens and natives.
"The natives, or 
natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."

IMO, by the way, many of Cruz' supposed fans are in fact false flag liberals who know the facts and hope to later crush Cruz on his eligibility and wind up with a democrat president. That would be if Trump did not lead Cruz by double-digits in the polls, which he does.

STOP WITH THE CRUZ SUPPORT. THE MAN IS NOT ELIGIBLE. And - AGAIN, THIS IS TRUE -  Obama has never been eligible, either, and he cannot claim ignorance, because he signed S. RES. 511 himself as a Senator and being the obnoxious wise-guy we all know he is, obviously knew he was pulling a fast one. Impeach Obama, immediately.

Sorry. No matter how you slice it, Cruz is not eligible.


Sunday, June 21, 2015

TO CONGRESS: The Time Has Come: IMPEACH OBAMA NOW or you will never be rid of his destructive activism.

Info, quotes and images used via the Fair Use Act.

JUST A SHORT MENTION: We hope that our courageous elected individuals in congress are not such confused, white-bread, unpopular-in-high-school nerds that they don't know how to impeach a half-black President who has committed obvious multiple impeachable offenses even liberals agree are impeachable offenses. If that's the case, we will explain to you how you impeach a Black President: the same way you impeach a White President. If you disagree, you have no place in our Congress. Resign.

EDIT: 6/25/2015: This has gotten long and detailed, indeed, below, so for those with limited time, here's a short list of definite offenses for which President can and must be impeached and removed, with all required qualifying Links in red (secondary qualifier links in Orange) followed by the reasons why President Obama's Impeachment is now a must for the continuation of the US as we have always known it (that's no exaggeration. Read on.)

Re Benghazi at least, Violation of

Note that when regarding terrorism, specifically, the prison term jumps from 5 to 8 years. This is a severe criminal act that far exceeds perjury as defined by
18 U.S. Code § 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court.
for which Democrat President Bill Clinton was impeached which carries a maximum prison term of only 5 years.

Re Immigration Law (even the liberal NY Times has admitted that Obama has committed an impeachable offense on Immigration) and ObamaCare, Violation of 
U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 3
which states that the President shall faithfully execute all laws of the U.S. 

Re Killing US Citizens with Drones without due process is, according to many lawyers on the left and right, an act of murder, as well as a Violation (in Preamble, Chapter 1) of the

United Nations Charter

Re secretly Seizing Telephone records of the Associated Press and Fox News, clear violation of the 

Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Re Targeting Tea Party groups via the IRS, Obama, apparently complicit in a cover-up according to a House Investigative report, is in violation of the

Hatch Political Activity Act
which imposes limitations on government workers in their ability to influence elections and if violated, removed from their position. 

(Sorry to have to say it, but) Re Obama's now-proven forged birth certificate -  everyone now knows it - including expert Joseph Newcomer whose analysis of the Bush National Guard "Killian" forgeries got Dan Rather fired as anchor of CBS Nightly news ) is a Violation of 

10 U.S. Code § 923 - Art. 123. Forgery

Honorable mention: Re appointing high-level cabinet members without congressional approval may or may not rise to the level of an Impeachable Offense.



EDIT, 5:53 PM EST, 6/23/2015: ADDENDUM RE TWITTER CENSORSHIP of this Impeach Obama memo

We are seeing astounding censorship of links to this BT memo at Twitter, now.

Here's how it obviously works: Twitter's pretty obvious censorship team is, IMO, apparently coordinated by Perverted Justice "Leader" Miss Del Harvey (incredibly, hired by Twitter to run their 'safety department"  !!!). IMO it seems as though once Twitter admins identify a strong conservative voice on Twitter, Twitter admins, doing what we assume only what Twitter admins can do, brazenly deletes retweets off people's walls in real time. We have seen this before and it was more or less confirmed by celebrities who retweeted me and I saw it, but the retweets vanished instantly and the celebs claimed not to have deleted them. The celebs then retweeted them without incident.

Check your own Tweets with dummy accounts run through proxies so Twitter doesn't know it's you and you may very well see censorship of your primary account if you are a conservative. IMO Twitter's administrators are now nothing more or less than social media Nazis.


A numbered and realistic list of the impeachable offenses, in detail, committed by Obama follows the analysis. There are not many truly impeachable offenses, but they are solid and very severe.

Please note as always we prove the facts here with links to respected mainstream sources or undeniable manifest evidence, highlighted in orange.

To begin with, impeaching Obama is something some liberal democrats have suggested, so this is can be framed as a bipartisan issue. That removes 90% of the political uncertainty. As long as the GOP congress keeps quoting those liberal democrats and calls it a bipartisan desire to have Obama impeached and removed to keep solid the rule of law, the media is helpless to credibly defend Obama against impeachment.

For all the pain and disaster Obama has leveled on this nation, this blog has never demanded that the Congress go through the inconvenience of impeaching and removing Obama from office. We do so now in the strongest terms, because regardless of the myriad of legal justifications for doing so anyway, a primary reason has only recently occurred to us: GOP congress, if you do not impeach Obama now, you'll never be rid of him. He will spend the rest of his life trying to politically ruin you and turn the youth of this country against their own nation.

This has gotten serious, now. As Obama's personal history is evermore revealed (I don't mean conspiracy theories, I mean quantifiable, undeniable facts) and it merges with his Presidential actions, the content of Obama's character comes into focus: he is a nasty, intentionally  destructive  communist agitator. 

If un-impeached, Obama will not go quietly into the night, write books and play the role of Elder Statesmen as is expected of Presidents. He is young and obviously enjoys being destructive regardless of human life and it is now plain that he will work to ruin all he can in this nation, including working to undermine the GOP Congress and GOP Presidents, their work and their re-election prospects for the rest of his life. It seems that he can't help himself. It now appears it's in his blood. Literally.

Of gigantic historical significance is the fact that a 1995 video (Link) has been unearthed in which Obama admits from his own mouth  that his mentor "Poet Frank" from his autobiography was indeed FBI-watched communist agitator Frank Marshal Davis - horribly, a close friend of Obama's parents and grandparents by Obama's own admission - a man who had a 600-page FBI file on him because of his anti-American actions; whose poems are sometimes racist-filled rants and other times love letters to the sadistic and murderous soviet army. This is the man who more than any other - more than Ayres or Wright and ten times worse than both rolled together, no joke - instilled Obama with the social and political values he holds close.

It seems that Obama's mentor was so alarmingly unhinged that according to his apparently also-radical friend Kathryn Waddwll Takara, the anti-Christian Davis authored a poem called "Christ Is A Dixie Nigger". Why didn't Barack Obama tell us about that when he ran for office? Because he knew he could not be elected dog catcher if American knew the truth about him. 

Davis is the man who Obama admitted was his mentor for 8 years and the degree to which Davis directly influenced Obama appears obvious in Obama's current actions as President. For example, Davis wrote that the only people Winston Churchill cared about were the whites of the British Empire, and as we all know, Obama, otherwise inexplicably as President, insulted the British crown by sending back a gift from them in the form of a bust of Winston Churchill (in typical Obama form, initially Obama's people lied about returning it until they were caught).  

It's becoming clear we basically have a younger, second-hand but just as intense version of Frank Marshall Davis, Obama's anti-Christian, Stalin-loving communist mentor, as President. That is extremely dangerous to this nation, and seems to explain many of Obama's impeachable offenses. It also may explain what happened to the still-missing 30 Benghazi survivor witnesses whose testimony could bring down Obama's presidency. 

Additional evidence that Obama was intimately connected to Davis can be found at the bottom of this blog memo.**

This is very bad news. 

The picture of the real Barack Obama emerges very clearly, now, and it's worse than anyone has ever guessed: Young Barack of the broken home was raised by communists. Brainwashed by communists. Did their bidding. Was shuttled by his grandparents a few days a week from the age of 10 to 18 to the home of one of America's most notorious America-hating communists. This is not theory. We now know it to be fact. Believes in their cause. Behaves - manifestly, mind you, categorically - in the mindset of the man who schooled him for 8 years, Frank Marshall Davis. Coupled with sitting in Wright's church of hate for 20 years, it is obvious that Barack embraced Davis' teachings of how to hate whites, traditional America, how to overthrow America (an apparent aim of Davis).Davis and presumably Obama's parents and grandparents, and likely Obama himself thought (and think) that soviet-style communism as practiced by the 40-million murderer Joseph Stalin was a good thing. 

The world has been conned. Worse than that, the con man is ruining this country while a timid and confused GOP congress sits with its collective thumb up its ass, making up rationalizations for not impeaching Obama because they plainly don't know how to do their jobs. 

All about Obama that is true but previously hidden and only suspected and rumored about is obvious, now, and it all falls into very deep focus: from Obama refusing to salute the American flag (video) in a truly brazen act of contempt for this country to giving up our ability to protect ourselves in space, which he has handed to Russia's former KGB Officer Putin. From allowing Ambassador Stevens to perish horribly to his complete disregard to the workings and restrictions placed upon him by the United States Constitution. And unless Congress impeaches him and shocks the nation with the depth and depravity of Obama's gross list of impeachable offenses by exposing them in public hearings which the media cannot silence, Obama, the still-young man, will be a non-stop destructive actor on the world stage, doing everything he can to ruin Republican Presidents and Congressmen for the rest of his life. 

It's obvious, now, with the release of the 1995 video: Obama is a destructive communist agitator and a believer. We'll never be rid of him unless you put a stop to his political authority now with impeachment and removal, something, once again, even some liberal democrats have suggested. 

Here is the admittedly short list we feel is solid regarding impeachment.

To our pals on the right, don't attack this blog for leaving out your favorite Obama impeachable offense. This short list is horrendous enough to send any President and his official oil portrait to political purgatory. Let's stay focused on facts and only facts. 

1. Gross Illegal Violation of the War Powers Act.

Obama militarily intervened in Libya in 2011 without the Congressional approval required by the War Powers Act. Legal experts seem to agree that this is the strongest case for easy impeachment and removal, and there is no obligation on the part of congress to act at the time of the transgression on the issue. Congress can, and should, simply say, in so many words, "We tried to be extra nice to our first half-black president, but he's been such a lawbreaking bastard to everyone on the face of the planet hat we can't do it in good conscience anymore and neither do many liberal democrats" and impeach and remove him.  

Boehner, wipe the tears of love from your eyes and get on the stick or get out of the way. And if Boehner won't, the rest of you Congressional GOP must move the Tearful Tyrant out of the way and do it yourselves.

Removing Boehner as Speaker is a good idea regardless. Boehner should not be playing golf with the executive whom Boehner has a duty to hold accountable. The appearance of personal conflict of interest is enough to have seen Boehner gone as Speaker of the House years ago.

Even Congressman Dennis Kucinich, the seven-term liberal Democrat from Ohio said Obama committed an "impeachable offense" in the matter of Lybia. When even ultra-liberal Kucinich says a liberal must go, that liberal must go. Quote Kucinich and other liberals on this issue on TV and do it loudly. Remember, impeaching and removing Obama from office is a bipartisan desire.

2. Killing US Citizens With Drones and Without Due Process.

Obama violated the U.S. Constitution by authorizing drone strikes to kill American citizens abroad without due process.   In the opinion of most lawyers,  republican and democrat alike, under US law, what Obama did was to commit nothing less than repeated acts of cold-blooded murder of  United States citizens.  Yes, they were very, very bad people who were killed. OK. We get that. But the US does not kill its own citizens it believes to be criminals who are not shooting at officers sent to arrest them without due process. By every legal definition this country has to offer, to do otherwise is called murder

Right-leaning lawyer Bruce Fein, who was a top Justice Department official under the Reagan administration, said on this issue of drones killing US citizens, even citizens suspected of being terrorists, "That’s what we read about in the Soviet Union under Stalin and Khrushchev and Brezhnev. That’s what we read about in China under Mao. Is that what we want to be?”

Worse, Obama's administration has said that they could use drones to kill US citizens on US soil. Basically, in truth, they advocated wholesale murder at the discretion of a coke-snorting, America-hating communist punk who conned his way into the White House.

On the other side, for bipartisanship, far-left ACLU also strongly objected, saying "Obama basically believes he can be judge, jury and executioner." Indeed, the liberal ACLU sued the Obama Administration for information about the killings. From Mother Jones to the Huffington Post, hard-core liberals have severely condemned Obama on this issue.

A 2013 Gallup poll showed American citizens, unsurprisingly, opposed Obama using drone strikes to kill Americans. Once presented with the idea of doing so on US soil, only 13% supported the idea, so Congress is on extraordinarily safe political ground impeaching Obama on this offense. 

3. Intentional Refusal To Enforce Federal Immigration Laws. 

Even the very liberal NY Times Op-Ed on this agrees that Obama can be impeached on this issue alone, though, you know, laughingly they don't necessarily recommend the idea based on opinions which unsurprisingly have nothing to do with the law. 

Obama's motivation, being a communist political animal, is obviously to get more democrat voters into the US than GOP. 

If you are unfamiliar with this story, basically Obama has said, in effect, "I will not obey immigration law and I will simply do whatever I want on this issue." Presidents can't do that. Big time no-no. Obama needs a time out without his blankey, via impeachment. 

Basically the President signs the laws Congress writes or the President does not sign the laws Congress writes. That's all he gets to do when it comes to legislation. He doesn't get to make up his own laws that suit him, which Obama has so acted to do repeatedly, and each one of those instances is an impeachable offense, some worthy of removal from office. It's time congress made it happen.

4. Benghazi - Obstruction of Justice

This one is personal with us. Obama neglected his most basic duty to protect an Ambassador from harm when warning signs were positively everywhere. Gross incompetence is the very least he could and should be charged with on this matter.

For liberals, know that murdered Ambassador Stevens was a liberal democrat who loved and supported Obama and Hillary Clinton, who then ignored liberal Stevens' cries for help and let him die horribly. Please know that using Stevens and Benghazi as a model, Obama and Clinton would do the same to you. The GOP, when impeaching and removing Barack Obama from the Presidency, must repeat this point that Obama would trap, abandon and similarly allow to die any other liberal, too, as he did to liberal Stevens, unless people have a reason to believe he had something specifically against Stevens. The GOP must make this point at every public appearance on the subject, in every speech and on every television interview. It's the GOP's sure-fire way to deflect left-wing media attack when it comes to the Benghazi issue relating to impeachment. This is guaranteed.

Additionally, by fighting to keep hidden from congress the names of the Benghazi survivor witnesses Obama is clearly engaged in obstruction of justice per 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.  Not about a silly Watergate political burglary, but about the murder of a US Ambassador and his aides, which can be laid at Obama's Office door. 

Also, by lying to the American people about the cause of the Benghazi attacks, that, too, is obstruction of justice: after all, Obama basically came to the defense of the murderers by suggesting they were otherwise good people who were 'enraged" by a cheap and ineffective video out of millions. 

This makes Watergate and Bill Clinton's dalliance perjuries look like a picnic. The Obama Administration as become a destructive living nightmare.

BY THE WAY, THE SECRETARY OF STATE CAN BE IMPEACHED FOR LYING ABOUT BENGHAZI EVEN AFTER SHE HAS LEFT OFFICE AS THE SECRETARY OF STATE. ENTIRELY LEGAL AND PROHIBITS THAT SECRETARY STATE FROM SERVING AS A FUTURE PRESIDENT. IN THIS CASE, HILLARY CLINTON. Want to end Hillary Clinton's Presidential run? Impeach her as secretary of state as part of the Benghazi Select Committee actions. Bam. No more Hillary for President. As easy as that. Over and deservedly so. The United States simply cannot have that avaricious, lying harpy getting to within a hundred miles of being the chief executive in the same office - how she could be so pathologically detached about the issue is alarming in itself - where her own cheating, lying, perjury-guilty and impeached husband was getting bl*w jobs from some kid he apparently conned for sex and then whose name he dragged through the mud to try to save his own political ass when he got caught. This is America. We need to maintain some absolutely basic standards.

The Benghazi dead will roll in their graves if Hillary Clinton is allowed to run for President.

5. IRS Targeting Conservative Republicans

A House Investigation shows that probable cause exists that Obama was directly involved in the IRS illegal targeting conservative businesses.This alone is worthy of impeachment on a myriad of different levels, all serious. 

A congressional investigation reported that,

“The pressure to ‘fix the problem,’ (of Conservative Tea Party group ascendancy) as articulated by Lois Lerner, originated with President Obama and senior party leadership..... For twenty-several months, from February 2010 until May 2012, the Internal Revenue Service systematically targeted conservative tax-exempt applicants for additional scrutiny and delay.” 

That is not cute and it is not "politics". That is extremely serious criminal conduct carried out on a massive scale against the American people by their own government. 

The report also stated that Obama was involved the the secondary - and potentially more serious -  crime of covering up the initial IRS series of crimes. Pardon my French, but let's keep this real: Obama is a nasty, lawbreaking, son-of-a-bitch wise guy punk and if he retires as a 'popular president" politically unscathed, he will be working behind the scenes, in front of the camera, as well as lecturing to endless impressionable university students, the endless community organizer - Frank  Marshall Davis reborn - in this nation for the rest of his life to cause exactly this same kind of lawless destruction. We'll never be rid of his destructive influence. His entire personal history points to that obvious and horrendous conclusion. And Congress will have committed a breach of its own responsibilities by not impeaching Obama over these entirely impeachable offenses and thus allowing Obama to hurt this nation for the rest of his life.

5. Obamacare

How impeachable art thou? Let me count the ways. Obama extended, changed and modified provisions in Obamacare, each time ignoring the required congressional approval to do so. Every time he did one of those things, he committed an impeachable offense.

Obamacare was sold as a lie, and as readers know, this blog's  opinion is that Obamacare's true purpose had nothing to do with health care. As Rep Gohmert discovered, Obamacare enrollment attempts to squeeze from the applicant that person's political party affiliation. We believe Obamacare's sole purpose was nothing more or less than a monstrous gimmick, run by the Obama-controlled IRS, to deny life-saving measures to applicants with an R beside their name and approve it to those with a D beside their name, and in so doing, tip the voting balance of power forever to the liberal democrats, because the older GOP voters would have died from 'natural causes" while the older democrat voters would be saved. Mining for applicant's political affiliation makes it clear that Obamacare was nothing more than a political numbers game that only the devil could love. 

Too horrible to be realistically possible? That is always the mistake well-meaning people make which opens the door for evil to thrive. 

The Russian people by and large have always been good, honest people with a long and productive history. Just the same, Russia's Communist Leader Joseph Stalin, whom Frank Marshall Davis is said by friends to have adored, murdered 40 million of his own people, ordering two at a time to be shot simultaneously through the head to save ammunition, while the victims were often ordered to kneel on the edge of positively gigantic mass graves off in the country, looking into thousands of dead bodies, knowing they would, themselves be murdered and added to the slaughter, into which they toppled after being shot to save on burial costs less than 70 years ago,  and most people in Russia did not know Stalin was a psychopathic mass murderer until it was too late. Indeed, these facts were stricken from the Russian history books until Gorbachev came along. Stalin is a man Obama's mentor and/or father Frank Marshall Davis admired. That appears to be absolute historic fact, not hypothesis. And in his book, Barack Obama muses how he would often stop when a decision had to be made, imagine Davis visually, and think to himself, "What would Frank do?" 

We have a real problem in the White House folks - a big, big problem - and if the GOP does not impeach and remove him in a wave of scandal which shocks and horrifies this nation, Obama will plague this nation and its good people with his evil dirty work like the devil himself for the rest of his life - and ours.

On the bipartisan aspect of impeachment as it relates to Obamacare, as we all know, many, many liberals have turned on Obamacare, too, and this and this and this are just the tiniest sampling of that fact.

6. Intimidation Of the Press

Obama apparently unlawfully seized telephone records of 20 telephone lines used by more than 100 Associated Press reporters and editors to basically spy on their reporting. Where does this story come from? The Associated Press itself which called it a "massive and unprecedented intrusion".

Liberals join conservatives in hating this one, too. Liberal Democrat Patrick Leahey said, "I am very troubled by these allegations and want to hear the government's explanation. The burden is always on the government when they go after private information... I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden."

The eventual explanation was so legally weak that it has been condemned by left and right lawyers.

Likewise, Representative Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, said it was clear to her that the Justice Department impaired the First Amendment right to free speech.

The always far-left ACLU said "The attorney general must explain the Justice Department's actions to the public so that we can make sure this kind of press intimidation does not happen again." 

Even Worse, Obama went after Fox News phone records also and "labeled one (Fox) correspondent a criminal "co-conspirator" in its successful effort to seize his personal emails."  The Fox reporter was not in any way engaged in any wrongdoing. The term "criminal co-conspirator" appears to have been Obamaspeak for political adversary - of a news reporter not towing the Obama line. Very Joseph Stalin of Obama. Just exactly what you would expect from the protege of Frank  Marshall Davis.

Like all that is bad and Obama, we still don't know the full truth on all of this, and as usual, GOP Speaker Boehner has let these problems vanish away like a wisp of fog in the night, and that attitude, too, needs to be corrected by Congress.

Lawyers agree that these acts were very clear breaches of the Forth Amendment seemingly in an effort to control the First Amendment. When the President does that intentionally, it's an impeachable offense.

7. Obama's Proven Criminal Forgery

Whether you want to deal with it or not, the famous and beloved "America's Sheriff", with 30 years of federal law enforcement,  a constituency of 5 million people for 20 years, responding to a request from his constituents, using the best from his team of 3,500 law enforcement people, investigated Obama's posted birth certificate and Arpiao and his team found it to be a pathetic criminal forgery. Posting that forgery on a government website is a serious felony.  

Sorry to "go birther" on you in this memo, but with the revelation that Davis was indeed "Poet Frank", we're guessing that the forgery - Stop! Yes it is a forgery, stop pretending that it isn't, every analysis by conservatives and liberals alike agree on that - was to cover up the actual birth certificate which we are now convinced will show Davis to be Barack Obama's actual biological father. It's the only thing that makes sense: why else would Obama's grandparents shuttle 10-year-old Barack over to that apparently nearly-destitute, notorious, old anti-American racist, who was well-known as a communist agitator, who drank whiskey out of an emptied jelly jar, took pictures of naked women and read poetry to Barack so vile as to be, IMO, truly grotesquely sick, and leave Barack with that man all day, over and over and over, year after year until Barack was old enough to drive himself? That kind of shuttling is what grandparents do with their kids when the person they shuttle the kid to is a parent, not a 'friend of the family" unless, IMO, Obama's larger family was more screwed-up than anyone can possibly imagine. And apparently Barack simply soaked in the atmosphere and lessons from "Poet Frank" like a sponge - this, by his own admission.

Obama obviously lied on every form about not just what he wanted to do, but even who his birth parents were. If lying on any such form precludes him from continuing to be President - boot, out he must go if we are a nation in which our lawmakers themselves follow the law. 

Time to grow a little common-sense courage and get on the stick on the birth certificate forgery and ignore the media trying to mock the issue into non-existence. Without impeachment, Obama will retire empowered for the rest of his life to ruin your lives. Rely on it. And lying to the  American people about his birth certificate - Donald Trump showed the issue will be embraced by the right spokesperson (he was number one in the polls for Presidential possibilities before he ever ran back in 2012) - is the kind of gross shock that will turn the country against Obama and embrace impeachment and removal. Nobody likes a smartass. Especially one who has ruined both their healthcare and their employment prospects.

Honorable Mention: 

President Obama has appointed numerous people to cabinet level positions without the consent of the U.S. Senate, as is required by the Constitution. There is debate as to whether this rises to High Crimes and Misdemeanors. However, it is a violation of the law to skip congressional approval if those people are paid by taxpayer money, and they are, and a few of these appointments were struck down by the court.

We ask every one of you reading this to immediately publicly tweet in discussion threads all the members of the GOP House and Senate and give them this blog and message:

If you are gentlemanly to Obama and ignore your obligations to impeach him on these matters while Obama is laughing at you behind your backs, he will repay your kindness by spending the rest of his life - and yours - 30 or 40 years, trying to ruin your careers and election prospects as the grand old man of the democrat party and you know he'll be a nasty wise guy about it and ruin many if not all of you however possible in time. 

You have never read this blog communicate like this before. But we have not been entirely convinced of all of this until now.

If you don't impeach Obama now, you are going to have two sets of enemies fighting your re-elections at every turn for the rest of your lives: Obama and the kids he will be organizing and leading against you, and the right activists hating you for the rest of your lives for allowing Obama to do it. Under those circumstances, I would say your prospects for happy and comfortable careers are not good.

There are rumors that Obama has been blackmailing and threatening members of Congress to avoid impeachment. If this is true, then, if legal, they should throw it right back at Obama and say,"We are going to impeach and remove you in a wave of scandal to stop your influence. If you blackmail us, we will send you to prison for the rest of your life, as well."

Do it for the country.

Do it for your kids and grandchildren.

Do it for yourselves.

Whether biological or by political proxy, Obama as President is essentially the son of Frank Marshall Davis and he must not be allowed to walk away unscathed from his impeachable offenses. This is now a critical necessity for the continuation of this country as we have always known it. Otherwise Frank Marshall Davis reborn will be working his evil magic on this nation for the rest of his life. The GOP House and Senate has no right to subject this nation to that kind of future.

The time has come.


If you wish to motivate others or debate this post, please leave comments for moderation, below. Anonymous is OK.


** ADDITIONAL shocking evidence of the Obama/Davis connection: 

Worse yet, the recently found 1995 video, which proves from Obama himself that he was in direct intimate personal contact with Davis almost daily from ages 10 to 18, arranged by his mother and grandparents, provides the last apparent connecting puzzle piece for our FBI-style, morphing graphic analysis which basically proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Barack Obama is the biological son of Frank Marshall Davis: we found that by carefully morph/mixing - in a straightforward, 100% entirely scientifically unbiased way which we show you how do yourselves - a formal photo portrait of Obama's mother with a formal photo portrait of Frank Marshall Davis, you inadvertently - indeed, cannot do anything but -   create an identical facial duplicate of President Barack Obama virtually exactly - a trillion-to-one impossibility unless Davis is Barack Obama's actual biological father. (A mix of Obama's mother and Barack's supposed father Obama Sr produces a stranger no one has ever seen before).

This explains why it was so important for Obama's grandparents to ensure that young Barack Obama saw Davis all the time from ages 10 to 18 years as described in Obama's own biography. IMO and that of many others, Davis is obviously Barack Obama's biological father, and the virtually  conclusive circumstantial evidence exists on many levels, in many directions. That probably also explains, additionally, still, why a very young Obama wrote not one but two autobiographies. It wasn't an ego-driven hyperventilating need to write about himself which prompted him to write two published autobiographies before he had accomplished anything - it was that Obama was plainly nervous about putting to rest questions -lying, if you will - about his past before such questions were asked. 

All this is very bad news.

Additional circumstantial evidence everyone knows is that amateur nude photos of Obama's mother were apparently discovered among the late Davis' possessions, and, coincidence or not, the woman in the sado-masochistic and lesbian-themed adult magazines also apparently in Davis' possession is absolutely a dead-ringer for Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's late mother. Not as damning as the photo morph analysis, but additional strong circumstantial evidence. Davis did not just have the magazines, he had the prints and negatives which he apparently took himself (an admitted amateur photographer) that appeared in the magazines.

Obstruction Of Justice; killing US citizens without due process; committing wartime actions without approval of Congress; intimidating and spying on the press; changing laws illegally at a whim; posting a forgery about himself; illegally weaponizing the IRS for political gain; appointing cabinet members without congressional approval; obviously lying about his past on legal documents. It's almost too much to absorb.

It's pretty plain. Obama has lied to the world about everything in order to gain the power he craves to hurt the nation he hates: America. And if the GOP congress allows him to retire as an unimpeached president, you can forget about this nation's future for good.